On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 12:20 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Examples:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-January/062944.html
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-August/051544.html
I 've kept messages from this list
Am 06.05.2013 04:02, schrieb Noel Butler:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
On 6/05/2013 10:46 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
The problem with dovecot is, Timo does not release rc's or beta's where
this testing could show the bugs found
http://www.dovecot.org/oldnews.html
On 2013-05-05 10:20 PM, Reuben Farrelly reuben-dove...@reub.net wrote:
On 6/05/2013 12:02 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I have not got it, but I see from this msg header you CC'd to me direct
as well? why are you not honouring the list headers, which is set as
reply-to list? Please fix your client.
Hello,
I'm in the process of migrating mailbox from one dovecot server running
dovecot 2.1.9 with mailboxes stored in maildir format to a newer one
running 2.1.16 with mailboxes stored in mdbox format.
To migrate mailboxes I'm using dsync as explained at
Maybe you should ask for a refund, or assist with the next version.
You do program, right?
Dave
On 2013-05-06 03:09, Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 12:20 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Examples:
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/140156.html
Le 6 mai 2013 à 01:59, Noel Butler a écrit :
On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 05:29 -0700, Professa Dementia wrote:
[...]
and enabling this option makes the server non-compliant. The section
under The UPDATE State is clear about the behavior of the server:
The POP3 server removes all messages
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 14:12 +0200, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of migrating mailbox from one dovecot server running
dovecot 2.1.9 with mailboxes stored in maildir format to a newer one
running 2.1.16 with mailboxes stored in mdbox format.
To migrate
On 05.05.2013 02:56, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
May 4 20:16:30 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Cached message size
smaller than expected (2000 8063)
May 4 20:16:30 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.cache: Broken
On 25.4.2013, at 11.51, Oli Schacher dove...@lists.wgwh.ch wrote:
# 2.2.1 (83d83f55e5c2+) / dsync replicated setup
I just noticed that 'doveadm search' apparently tries to replicate
mailboxes and spits out errors if a mailbox in the search query is not
found:
#doveadm search -u
On 29.4.2013, at 15.30, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
I just upgraded one of our servers to dovecot v2.1.16 (ee), and am looking
into the stats feature. Am I interpreting the wiki correct in reading that
the doveadm stats dump command only returns statistics about IMAP
On 29.4.2013, at 12.48, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
I am trying replication over dsync/ssh, as explained there:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication
I added the options below to dovecot.conf. It works, but it
seems there is a new SSH connexion for each user, which is a bit
On 30.4.2013, at 2.25, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
In dovecot-2.2.1 neither the SELECT nor the EXAMINE commands include an
untagged URLMECH reply. (Note, this is not the one mandated by the RESETKEY
command.)
AFAICT RFC 4467 does not require an URLMECH reply to SELECT or
On Mon, 6 May 2013 17:30:51 +0300
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Not related to replication, but yeah, probably better to just ignore
nonexistent mailboxes. Changed in hg.
ah, sorry, I thought Syncing mailbox meant dsync.
Anyway, thanks for the fix!
--
message transmitted on 100%
On 30.4.2013, at 12.22, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
backup dsync destination a year (or two) ago, and got quite confused..
On 2013-05-06 10:54 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 30.4.2013, at 12.22, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last copy, or something. I did some testing of using SIS on a
backup dsync
On 6.5.2013, at 18.03, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2013-05-06 10:54 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 30.4.2013, at 12.22, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
Wasn't there also some issue with cleanup of attachments ? Not being able
to delete the last
On 3.5.2013, at 4.19, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
without having set *mpurl_r to NULL
Right, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/24aa10efe132
That fixes it, thanks, but I wonder if it's incomplete? I notice that these
also sometimes don't set *mpurl_r:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:20:52PM +0200, Morten Stevens wrote:
May 4 21:15:17 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/mail/.imap/Commandes/dovecot.index.cache:
Broken physical size for mail UID 680
Does that ring a bell? I am tempted to downgrade
On 2013-05-06 11:23 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 6.5.2013, at 18.03, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Hey Timo - so, how will rsync be affected as a backup app? Will it
maintain the deduped state in the backup target?
Ideally you'd rsync from a filesystem snapshot
On 2013-05-06 12:06 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Understood, and figured as much - I'll be using lvm snapshots and
rsnapshot (which keeps backups using hardlinks against previous backup
snapshots, making it easy to keep backups going back years without
taking up much
Greetings,
Is this possible to upgrade directly from 2.0 to 2.2? If so, is there a
guide for doing this?
Thank you.
--
--Asai
On 5/6/2013 12:28, Asai wrote:
Greetings,
Is this possible to upgrade directly from 2.0 to 2.2? If so, is there a
guide for doing this?
Thank you.
Make sure to read these:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.1
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.2
--
staticsafe
O ascii ribbon
On 3.5.2013, at 4.00, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Dovecot-2.2.1 plus Timo's recent CATENATE and URLAUTH fixes mishandles
literals after bad URLs.
That input_skip_line is highly annoying in the APPEND code. Elsewhere it kind
of makes sense, but in APPEND it's difficult to keep
On 3.5.2013, at 3.34, Mike Abbott michael.abb...@apple.com wrote:
Testing URLAUTH in dovecot-2.2.1 plus Timo's recent CATENATE and URLAUTH
fixes eventually trips some assertions. No simple sequence of commands
always hits these; they appear to be timing-dependent.
The first one is:
On 05/ 6/13 11:55 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:20:52PM +0200, Morten Stevens wrote:
May 4 21:15:17 volanges dovecot: imap(jdoe): Error: Corrupted index
cache file /mail/indexes/jdoe/mail/.imap/Commandes/dovecot.index.cache:
Broken physical size for mail UID 680
Does
Hello list
today I built dovecot 2.2.1 from sources. But I have permission problems
with LDA
The normal imap part works fine, users can login and see their boxes.
deliver is called as LDA from postfix master.cf as follows
dovecot unix- n n - - pipe
On 2013-05-03 19:13, Professa Dementia wrote:
When I specify that an email be
deleted from the server, I expect that it is *deleted*.
While I see the point you're trying to make, I don't think it is valid.
On our servers the deleted message could exist in filesystem snapshots,
disk-disk
Running into a weird issue in a mailbox that has 26+ keywords.
In one session, I do this:
S: 2 SELECT INBOX (QRESYNC (1255685337 78608 [...uids...]))
S: [...]
S: * OK [HIGHESTMODSEQ 78608] Highest
S: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1255685337] UIDs valid
S: 2 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
C: 3 UID STORE
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:00 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
I 've kept messages from this list since its last clean-out, in 08,
those message do not appear, it seems on jan 13, dovecots mail server
had no PTR entry, seems 11 messages in total missing - not my problem
stop this bullshit!
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 08:22 -0400, Dave Gattis wrote:
Maybe you should ask for a refund, or assist with the next version.
You do program, right?
I am involved in several projects already, Timo wouldn't accept anything
from me anyway :)
attachment: face-smile.png
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 15:39 +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
Hmmm...
Let's consider the RFC's part related to, for example, the TOP command:
If the POP3 server issues a positive response, then the
response given is multi-line. After the initial +OK, the
POP3 server sends
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 20:24 +0200, Tobi wrote:
Hello list
today I built dovecot 2.2.1 from sources. But I have permission problems
with LDA
The normal imap part works fine, users can login and see their boxes.
deliver is called as LDA from postfix master.cf as follows
dovecot unix-
- Original Message -
On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld t...@timgws.com.au wrote:
After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
will be too intensive, and will cause extra latencies when
retrieving
At 8PM +0200 on 6/05/13 Tobi wrote:
2013 May 6 18:37:59 nordkap lda: Fatal: Internal error occurred. Refer
to server log for more information.
May 6 18:37:59 nordkap dovecot: lda: Error: userdb lookup:
connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb) failed: Connection refused
May 6 18:37:59
At 4PM -0600 on 6/05/13 you (Michael M Slusarz) wrote:
Running into a weird issue in a mailbox that has 26+ keywords.
You are using Maildir, yes? Maildir stores keywords in the flags field
of the message filename, using lowercase letters, so there is a limit of
26 per folder. See
35 matches
Mail list logo
