-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, fe...@kngnt.org wrote:
I understand this is correct: as is a virtual user, it does not
have home folder. Is there any way I can set the autoexpunge plugin to
store the lock file in the virtual user email home folder?
well, h
On 19.11.2017 10:57, fe...@kngnt.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have enabled today the autoexpunge setting for Trash folders, and I am
> getting the following error when Dovecot starts:
>
> imap(): Error: autoexpunge: Couldn't create dovecot.autoexpunge.lock
> lock: User has no home directory
>
>
On 11/20/17 6:33 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 20.11.2017 16:20, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
On 11/20/17 6:15 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior
to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am st
On 11/20/17 1:58 PM, Someone wrote:
I've been struggling with this on and off for a while now. Upon
attempting to install Dovecot on Ubuntu 17.04 I get the following errors
Selecting previously unselected package dovecot-imapd.
(Reading database ... 243684 files and directories currently insta
I've been struggling with this on and off for a while now. Upon
attempting to install Dovecot on Ubuntu 17.04 I get the following errors
Selecting previously unselected package dovecot-imapd.
(Reading database ... 243684 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../dovecot-
Hello. I try to migrate dovecot 1 to dovecot 2 with doveadm backup.
But when i try to set doveadm backup i get :
mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ah.temp backup -R -u a...@test.pl
imapc:
doveadm(a...@test.pl ): Error: Mail access for users with UID
145 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in
On 20.11.2017 16:20, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
> On 11/20/17 6:15 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>
>> On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
>>> I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior
>>> to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped
>>> by LMTP reporting
On 11/20/17 6:15 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior
to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped
by LMTP reporting
dovecot: lmtp(10019, j...@example.com): Error: Relat
On 20.11.2017 16:12, Jeff Kletsky wrote:
> I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior
> to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped
> by LMTP reporting
>
> dovecot: lmtp(10019, j...@example.com): Error: Relative home
> directory paths not s
I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior
to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped by
LMTP reporting
dovecot: lmtp(10019, j...@example.com): Error: Relative home
directory paths not supported: 0
LDA does /not /have any problems wit
> On 20 Nov 2017, at 12.54, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> If I had lets say 10 nodes handling incoming SMTP and delivery to local
> maildirs in parallel and independantly on a network storage and imapping this
> from another independant 4 nodes, then building a not needed bottleneck by
> sh
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200
Sami Ketola wrote:
> > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski
> > wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right?
> > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough,
> > which dovecot does.
>
> On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
>
> AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right?
> The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough,
> which dovecot does.
You are building such a complex system and then you think that creating
Hey,
Here is subscribiton file
INBOX/INBOX
INBOX/Archives
INBOX/Archives/2014
INBOX/Archives/2015
INBOX/Archives/2016
INBOX/Calendar
INBOX/Drafts
INBOX/Sent
INBOX/Spam
INBOX/Trash
INBOX/Trash/eee
INBOX/alerts
INBOX/dos
INBOX/itmailid
INBOX/kolab
INBOX/mon
INBOX/tahtis
INBOX/test
INBOX/testiala
sh
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:40:55 +0200
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2017, at 21.33, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> >
> >
> > Me again have to stress that our former implementation of the lda process
> > did do exactly nothing to all the dovecot files, and everything worked
> > pretty well. We
Can you provide subscriptions file for the user as well?
Aki
On 20.11.2017 10:37, Kristjan Eentsalu wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to include it first time. bt full down below
>
> (gdb) bt full
> #0 0x000800d77e04 in mailbox_tree_traverse (tree=0x0, path=0x801c1a540
> "INBOX", create=false, created
Sorry, forgot to include it first time. bt full down below
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x000800d77e04 in mailbox_tree_traverse (tree=0x0, path=0x801c1a540
"INBOX", create=false, created_r=0x7fffe4f7) at mailbox-tree.c:103
node = (struct mailbox_node **) 0x10
parent = (struct mailbox_
can you please send bt full output?
Aki
On 20.11.2017 10:30, Kristjan Eentsalu wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm getting Segmentation fault when doing "doveadm mailbox list -s -u
> kristjan.eentsalu".
> doveadm mailbox list -u kristjan.eentsalu works fine.
>
> OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p1
> Dovecot 2.2.33.2
Hey,
I'm getting Segmentation fault when doing "doveadm mailbox list -s -u
kristjan.eentsalu".
doveadm mailbox list -u kristjan.eentsalu works fine.
OS: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p1
Dovecot 2.2.33.2 , pigenhole 0.4.21
Trace and dovecot -n below
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Fo
19 matches
Mail list logo