Re: Which DKIM application for postfix 3.9.0

Talking about completeness, you can also use rspamd (https://www.rspamd.com ). While it it design to to more than DKIM, it can be use for it. I have an internal mailer relay based on postfix and rspamd that works great. > Le 24 avr. 2024 à 09:40, infoomatic via dovecot

Re: The future of SIS

> Le 18 oct. 2023 à 09:35, Marc a écrit : > >> Dovecot has this option to store attachments separately not? So I am >> not sure this is then still a problem. >> >> >> >> Interesting. How do you tell dovecot to do that ? >> > > I thought I read about something like this, > >

Re: The future of SIS

Le 17 oct. 2023 à 16:34, Marc a écrit : The problem is a bit what everyone understands as s3. I associate this indeed also with an http endpoint on object storage. But the ceph plugin skips this http and talks directly to object store. I don't think you

Re: The future of SIS

Le 17 oct. 2023 à 13:12, Marc a écrit : Is s3 not to slow for this? I think the clue is in the name "s3- compatible". Clearly calling out to "real" (AWS) S3 would be a non-starter.

Re: The future of SIS

> Le 16 oct. 2023 à 15:51, Marc a écrit : > >>> Hello to everyone! >>> Ooops, we are using SIS, guess the solution for a similar optimization >> will be >>> a native deduplicated filesystem. >> >> did you really mean deduplicated or distributed? >> > > I think this duduplicating. Storage

Re: how to setup IMAPs with letsencrypt

> Le 22 avr. 2022 à 01:50, Jeremy Ardley a écrit : > > > > On 22/4/22 7:44 am, al...@coakmail.com wrote: >>> On 22/4/22 7:25 am, al...@coakmail.com wrote: >>> >> Thanks. I will give a try. >> after enabling SSL, can I disable port 143

Re: New to dovecot admin, question about using LDAP for user-specific values

> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 12:53, Gerben Wierda via dovecot a > écrit : > > >> On 13 Sep 2019, at 11:51, Jean-Daniel Dupas > <mailto:jddu...@xooloo.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 09:29, Gerben Wierda via dovecot &

Re: Multiple certificate option SNI

> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 12:10, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot > a écrit : > > Hi > I have some problem with SNI and dovecot 2.2.36.4 > > Server debian 9.x ad dovecot-2.2.36.4 > > default server ssl cert is a wildcard like *.domain.com (digicert) > > ssl_ca = /var/control/cert.pem >

Re: New to dovecot admin, question about using LDAP for user-specific values

> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 09:29, Gerben Wierda via dovecot a > écrit : > > Nobody? > >> On 10 Sep 2019, at 11:58, Gerben Wierda via dovecot > > wrote: >> >> I am new to dovecot administration. I’ve read the Wiki but that hasn’t given >> me the understanding I need.

submission configuration issues

Hello, I'm having trouble configuring the submission proxy. I have configured the submission service as follow: submission_host = smtp.example.com submission_relay_host = localhost submission_relay_port = 8587 submission_relay_rawlog_dir = /var/log/dovecot/ submission_relay_trusted = yes My

Re: Dovecot 2.3.0 TLS

> Le 18 juil. 2019 à 11:21, Alexandre Urban via dovecot a > écrit : > > Hello, > > I don’t know who will read this message, but I found this thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dovecot@dovecot.org=subject:%22Dovecot+2.3.0+TLS%22=newest > And I’m expected the same issue, I will

Re: [bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event

Sorry, I forgot to mention this is with the freshly released 2.3.7 > Le 12 juil. 2019 à 16:43, Aki Tuomi via dovecot a écrit > : > > Would you like to try with 2.3.7? It was released today. > > Aki >> On 12/07/2019 17:05 Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot < dovecot@dove

Re: [bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event

2 metrics (one for success, one for all) and diff the 2 to get the count of failed attempts. > Le 12 juil. 2019 à 15:31, Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot > a écrit : > > Hi, > > I'm playing with the new events, and encounter some issues: > > First the 'auth_request_

[bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event

Hi, I'm playing with the new events, and encounter some issues: First the 'auth_request_finished' event is documented as having a 'successful' field, but in the code, the field is defined as 'success' (e->add_str("success", "yes")). But more important, in the function

Re: Getting login stats

> Le 11 juil. 2019 à 15:33, Michael Slusarz via dovecot a > écrit : > >> I'm trying to get some IMAP auth stats on a Dovecot 2.3.6 instance, but >> whatever I declare in metric, it always show 0. > > None of these auth_* requests exist in 2.3.6. Thank. So maybe the wiki should be updated

Getting login stats

Hello, I'm trying to get some IMAP auth stats on a Dovecot 2.3.6 instance, but whatever I declare in metric, it always show 0. What I want basically is how many IMAP auth attempts there was on the server, and optional a way to filter on the auth attempt status (successful or failed). My

Re: Some questions

> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 14:06, Bardot Jérôme via dovecot a > écrit : > > Le 09/07/2019 à 17:28, Daniel Miller via dovecot a écrit : >> >> On 7/9/2019 6:17 AM, Jérôme Bardot via dovecot wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is my first email here. >>> I want to understand well how dovecot is

Re: Dovecot behind Load Balancer

> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 11:46, Paolo Daniele a écrit : > > > > Il 10/07/19 11:44, Jean-Daniel Dupas ha scritto: >> >>> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 10:24, Paolo Daniele via dovecot a >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> Il 10/07/19 10:20, Aki Tuo

Re: Dovecot behind Load Balancer

> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 10:24, Paolo Daniele via dovecot a > écrit : > > > Il 10/07/19 10:20, Aki Tuomi ha scritto: >>> On 12/06/2019 20:02 Paolo Daniele via dovecot wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> i've a question for you. >>> I've two dovecot imap/pop server behind a zen load balancer. >>>

Re: Cannot connect to DOVECOT from Roundcube using SSL on Port 993

> Le 19 juin 2019 à 11:34, zahn via dovecot a écrit : > > Hello > > I try to connect to dovecot from roundcube using this setup: > > $config['default_host'] = 'ssl://chogolisa.akadia.com'; > $config['default_port'] = 993; > > and I get the following error message from dovecot: > > Jun 19

Re: Mail account brute force / harassment

> Le 11 avr. 2019 à 12:23, Marc Roos via dovecot a écrit : > > > > Say for instance you have some one trying to constantly access an > account > > > Has any of you made something creative like this: > > * configure that account to allow to login with any password > * link that account

Re: High availability of Dovecot

> Le 11 avr. 2019 à 10:44, luckydog xf via dovecot a > écrit : > > Hi, list, > > I'm going to deploy postfix + dovecot + CephFS( as Mail Storage). > Basically I want to use two servers for them, which is kind of HA. > > My idea is that using keepalived or Pacemaker to host a

Re: Using SHA256/512 for SQL based password

> Le 13 févr. 2019 à 14:54, Robert Moskowitz via dovecot > a écrit : > > > > On 2/13/19 8:30 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 13.2.2019 15.18, Robert Moskowitz via dovecot wrote: >>> >>> On 2/13/19 1:23 AM, Matthias Fechner via dovecot wrote: Am 13. Februar 2019 00:34:15 schrieb

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic) packages now available

> Le 25 nov. 2018 à 19:25, Michael Ludwig a écrit > : > > > Hello Dovecot-List, > > so Ubuntu users now can get the latest dovecot version. As I am just building > a production mailserver for customers, this could come in handy, maybe. > For a live production system, is it reasonable to

Re: Dovecot send duplicated certificates when using ssl_alt_cert

> Le 24 mai 2018 à 09:55, Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@dovecot.fi> a écrit : > > > > On 17.05.2018 16:33, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 2018-05-16 (08:54 MDT), Jean-Daniel Dupas <jddu...@xooloo.com> wrote: >>> My problem is that when connecting, dovecot includes 2

dovecot 2.3 on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.3 from repo.dovecot.org on ubuntu 16.04 LTS, and I'm wondering if there is a scheduled date for the release of the bionic package in that repository. The Ubuntu mainstream version is based on the 2.2 branch, which prevent us to use it.

Dovecot send duplicated certificates when using ssl_alt_cert

Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.3.1 (c5a5c0c82) and trying to experiment with using both RSA and ECDSA certificates. My configuration is as follow: ssl_alt_cert =