Hi,
I have isolated the issue: after removing fts_squat dovecot seems to be
back to normal.
See also: https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/fts/squat/
Thank you for your support! You may close the issue. Cheers, Lukas
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 12:03 PM Lukas Matasovsky
wrote:
> Hi,
&g
192.168.2.50, lip=192.168.2.1, mpid=8683,
session=
Jan 2 11:55:10 judy dovecot: imap(monica)<8680>: Fatal:
master: service(imap): child 8680 killed with signal 11 (core dumps
disabled - https://dovecot.org/bugreport.ht
ml#coredumps)
Would you like to have a coredump as well?
Thank you
ction when an email is deleted via IMAP. However, when an
email is deleted via POP3, nothing is logged (because no replication
happens).
Does anyone have an idea why deleting an email via POP3 isn't replicated
and how to configure this?
Thanks for your help.
Lukas
My config (it is identical on on bo
action. In my first mail I made an example with three really obvious words but
my need is not about sex or crypto currency...
So, if you can help, please, help me. But personal opinions that don't answer a
question are... useless!
Lukas
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "@lbutlr"
A
pler to maintain if you have a long list of word. And here comes my
previous question: it would be great if there is a way to log the matching word
in order to know what word in that list was the "culprit".
Lukas
- Messaggio originale -
Da: "Volker Wysk"
A: "dove
way it is possible using Exim's System Filter)? I googled and searched a lot
Dovecot documentation but wasn't able to find a definite YES or NO to this
question.
Thanks a lot!
Lukas
* Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@dovecot.fi> [2018-03-13 08:56:02 +0200]:
On 12.03.2018 18:44, Christoph Lukas wrote:
* B. Reino <rei...@bbmk.org> [2018-03-10 23:10:30 +0100]:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018, Christoph Lukas wrote:
Am 10.03.2018 um 12:20 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
Change mail_location to
* B. Reino <rei...@bbmk.org> [2018-03-10 23:10:30 +0100]:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018, Christoph Lukas wrote:
Am 10.03.2018 um 12:20 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
Change mail_location too
That did it!
Thank you very much!
You may also want to correct the sieve directory (it uses %d and %n).
Am 10.03.2018 um 12:20 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
> Change mail_location too
>
>
> ---
> Aki Tuomi
> Dovecot oy
That did it!
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Christoph
Hello list,
Dovecot Version: 2.2.34 (874deae) on FreeBSD
MTA: Postfix 3.3.0
I've got an issue with the quota-status service:
Something breaks when receiving mail with a recipient address that includes
non-lowercase characters,
for example f...@example.com instead of f...@example.com:
postfix
s
This worked finde, as the dovecot-acl got copied from the parent folder
when the employees created new subfolders.
Now to my problem I'm facing right now:
This client got 2 new employees. So how can I edit all these dovecot-acl
files in all subfolders where these 2 new employess schould get acce
Hi,
> Am 06.04.2016 um 21:18 schrieb Timo Sirainen <t...@iki.fi>:
>
> On 05 Apr 2016, at 13:49, Lukas Kolbe <lko...@willert.de> wrote:
>>
>> For each invoke of doveadm backup -R, the local (new) mailbox gets wiped and
>> all mails are retransferred - so
m sync would
incorporate the changes from the local dovecot-mailbox into the remote
imapc:-Mailbox, which is the opposite of what I want.
Dovecot version is current head as of yesterday.
Is what I’m trying to do even possible with doveadm sync?
Kind regards,
Lukas
Hi there,
I'm running dovecot 2.2.13 on my debian jessie server.
When installing my own dovecot plugin, I noticed that there are no
notifications coming from the notify plugin.
I checked back with the mail_log plugin, but also this plugin doesn't
log any notifications when a new mailbox is
for an awesome piece of software and any input
on this topic,
Lukas
Hi,
Just a very gentle reminder :)
I don't see anything I am doing wrong in my config ...
Thanks
Luke
On 2014-07-11 17:45, Lukas Haase wrote:
Hi Timo,
Thank you very much. I really appreciate your response!
I have indeed a non-default socket config because I also let exim4
authenticate
Sirainen wrote:
You have misconfigured Dovecot's auth sockets. Providing doveconf -n
output would help figuring out the problem. Or just delete all the
auth-related socket settings from config files and it should work.
On 9.7.2014, at 0.03, Lukas Haase lukasha...@gmx.at wrote:
May I gently push
May I gently push this?
The string BUG: Authentication client sent unknown handshake command
comes from dovecot (presumably it's in the source code) so I think it
shouldn't be too mysterious what's happening here.
Thank you,
Luke
On 2014-07-03 19:10, Lukas Haase wrote:
Hi,
Some time ago my
Hi,
Some time ago my dovecot started to become BUGgy: Evertime I restart the
system, dovecot is started but I cannot login. I see the following
information in the logs:
Jul 4 04:04:36 mail dovecot: auth:
passwd-file(user,127.11.91.218,nfkQjFT9vwCADFra): no passwd file:
/etc/dovecot/imap.passwd
On 11/13/2012 1:18 AM, Michael Firnau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 01:44:37AM -0800, Lukas Haase wrote:
Hi,
On 11/12/2012 1:19 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Lukas Haase wrote:
Nov 12 07:28:21 mail dovecot: deliver(user2): sieve:
msgid=8644593.887351352701685934
Hi,
After using dovecot for several years now, today happend something which
makes me really feel unconfortable: An email received was just not
delivered properly, or, is lost! The mail (from an external server) was
sent to two local mailboxes, user1 and user2. user1 received the message
but for
Hi,
On 11/12/2012 1:19 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Lukas Haase wrote:
Nov 12 07:28:21 mail dovecot: deliver(user2): sieve:
msgid=8644593.887351352701685934.JavaMail.orbitz: stored mail into
mailbox 'INBOX'
are there any other log lines of user2?
Anfortunately
, it will get the uid that should have been given to the
pervious mail (the one that caused the error).
The previous mail still won't be listed in the uidlist, but everything works as
expected.
Best regards
Lukas Müller
Systems Engineer
___
NEWMEDIA
Südostschweiz
Thanks for the quick answer.
I realised, that the error didn't occur since quite a while, opposed to what
our client suggested.
Back then I activated the two workarounds (imap_client_workarounds =
outlook-idle delay-newmail) and increased mail_max_userip_connections for IMAP.
Is it possible
freundlichen Grüssen
Lukas Müller
Systems Engineer
___
NEWMEDIA
Südostschweiz Newmedia AG
Kasernenstrasse 1
Postfach 508, CH-7007 Chur
http://www.newmedia.chhttp://www.newmedia.ch/
___
TYPO3 Drupal - Wir wissen wie
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:33:09 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On
Tue, 2011-11-01 at 09:38 +0100, Lukas Weiß wrote:
and sql storage
is difficult to backup. Ive done that, by setting up dovecot with
maildir format and copy mails from old dbmail to new dovecot imap server
with my mail client
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:32:47 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On
30.10.2011, at 13.53, Lukas Weiß wrote:
ive just switched to
dovecot imap because dbmail i used before is not developed any further
Oh? It doesn't yet seem dead to me.
and sql storage is difficult
to backup. Ive done
mails show up
correctly, as the creation timestamp is new.
Thanks
Lukas
as a result
of large cleanups and fixes to mailbox/subscriptions listing.
Backporting the fixes to v2.0 (or even worse: v1.x) would probably be a
lot of trouble..
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:31 +0100, Lukas Haase wrote:
Hi,
I did further investigation on this issue (using raw IMAP commands) and
I
Hi,
I did further investigation on this issue (using raw IMAP commands) and
I think that this is a bug...
Am 15.02.2011 18:53, schrieb Lukas Haase:
Am 14.02.2011 14:54, schrieb Lukas Haase:
Hi,
I am unable to subscribe to shared folders (...)
everything seems to be correct (dovecot 1.2
Am 14.02.2011 14:54, schrieb Lukas Haase:
Hi,
I am unable to subscribe to shared folders with Thunderbird although
everything seems to be correct (dovecot 1.2).
What does not work? I click Subscribe... in Thunderbird. The shared
mailboxes are listed, all with [ ] (no checkbox). Therefore I
Hi,
I am unable to subscribe to shared folders with Thunderbird although
everything seems to be correct (dovecot 1.2).
What does not work? I click Subscribe... in Thunderbird. The shared
mailboxes are listed, all with [ ] (no checkbox). Therefore I mark them
[x], click subscribe and OK.
Am 10.02.2011 13:49, schrieb Lukas Haase:
[...]
Third (and main) question: In /var/mail/shared I want to have a mailbox
for each group. Each user is member of his respective groups (in terms
of UNIX permissions *and* ACLs).
The mailboxes are owned by their respective groups and if a user creates
Dear Timo,
Thank you for the reply!
Am 09.02.2011 23:55, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
[...]
Second, is there only *one* dovecot-shared per namespace or per mailbox
*under* a specific namespace? Or an arbitrary number (where the last
is taken)? Where does dovecot-shared need to be placed?
For each
Hi,
I read the Wiki about dovecot-shared a few times but it is not 100%
clear to me (at least for 1.2).
First, if I want shared keywords I *must* have a dovecot-shared. In this
case, the permissions are not taken any longer from the parent folder
(what is exactly this parent folder?) but
Am 08.02.2011 23:52, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 9.2.2011, at 0.12, Lukas Haase wrote:
I'm pretty sure it never worked. I think in v1.0 it simply
ignored the first uid=user. So you could probably just remove
that.
Unfortunately not. I am really sure it worked in v1.0. For
example:
I mean
Dear Timo,
Am 08.02.2011 23:48, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 9.2.2011, at 0.20, Lukas Haase wrote:
namespace public { separator = . prefix = Shared. location =
maildir:/var/mail/shared:CONTROL=~/Maildir/shared
location = maildir:/var/mail/shared:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared
Why? According
Hi,
On my mail server I want to implement shared folders for each workgroup
where there are many workgroups.
One way would be to create a separate namespace for each workgroup.
However, this does not scale well so I decided to use a single Shared
mailbox and use ACLs:
namespace public {
Hi,
I have a problem when migrating from dovecot 1.0 to dovecot 1.2 (Debian
lenny to Debian squeeze).
In my dovecot-ldap.conf I have:
user_attrs =
homeDirectory=home,uidNumber=uid,gidNumber=gid,uid=system_groups_user
I use the last parameter for the groups which I need for shared folders.
Dear list,
A dumb question: What exactly is the effect of the separator?
Is it also used to separate in the underlying file system? I.e. when I
have the separator '/', the IMAP folder Sent/Jan is physically stored as
/home/lukas/Maildir/.Send/Jan/cur
? If this is true this would greatly
Dear Timo,
Thank you for your advice!
Am 08.02.2011 18:35, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 8.2.2011, at 17.23, Lukas Haase wrote:
[...]
I know, but the message is somehow weird since it says it is
*currently* unsupported. However, it seems to me that it is not
supported any more. Is this true
Am 08.02.2011 18:14, schrieb Willie Gillespie:
On 02/08/2011 08:54 AM, Lukas Haase wrote:
Dear list,
A dumb question: What exactly is the effect of the separator?
Is it also used to separate in the underlying file system? I.e. when I
have the separator '/', the IMAP folder Sent/Jan
Dear Timo,
Thank you for your advice!
Am 08.02.2011 18:39, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 8.2.2011, at 12.33, Lukas Haase wrote:
namespace public {
separator = .
prefix = Shared.
location = maildir:/var/mail/shared:CONTROL=~/Maildir/shared
location = maildir:/var/mail
Hi,
I successfully configured dovecot using virtual users (and LDAP/AD).
deliver is the LDA and verifies if the user exists (as recommended in
the WIKI).
However, the howtos in the Wiki say *nothing* about the case that the
recipients should be verified *before* receiving the messages
Hi,
Thanks your your reply.
Am 13.10.2010 12:03, schrieb Jerry:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:32:50 +0200
Lukas Haaselukasha...@gmx.at articulated:
Hi,
I successfully configured dovecot using virtual users (and LDAP/AD).
deliver is the LDA and verifies if the user exists (as recommended
Am 13.10.2010 13:08, schrieb Daniel Luttermann:
Lukas Haase wrote on 10/13/2010:
[...]
By default, Postfix rejects mails for unknown local users.If Postfix
accepts mails for unknown users than it's a configuration problem or
you don't maintain a list of valid users.
Yes, but I am talking about
Hi,
I have activated only imaps and managesieve.
As sieve is running on a different port/protocol: Can I make sure that
sieve can ONLY be used with SSL/TLS?
As the credentials are transmitted I only offer services with SSL
(IMAPS, SMTP over SSL, ...). For sieve I am not sure about this.
Hi,
Am 23.09.2010 14:58, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:16 +0200, Lukas Haase wrote:
I have activated only imaps and managesieve.
As sieve is running on a different port/protocol: Can I make sure that
sieve can ONLY be used with SSL/TLS?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL
Thank
for the lengthy post and thank you in advance!
Regards,
Lukas Garberg
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 15:51 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:42 +0200, Lukas Garberg wrote:
As these additions cannot be used in the SQL query for the auth service
used by postfix (as users would be able to authenticate with any
password) I have defined a second auth
Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2010, 14:49 +0100 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
I tried to use the sieve vacation plugin, but we're facing a little
problem: our user's addresses are uid@domain, and if they want
and not the original sender of the message. Is there
any way to circumvent this? Sending a vacation back to oneself doesn't
really make sense here :)
Oh, and happy new year and thank you all for this great piece of
software!
--
Lukas
Hello,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 14:36 -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
drwxrwx--- 5 root office 4096 Dec 15 15:53 .Office
Why are your files and directories owned by root, instead of peter?
Oh right, kind of stupid question. I already forgot we were talking
about shared
Hello Timo,
once again thanks for your reply!
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 10:55 +0900, Lukas Haase wrote:
[...]
* UNIX rights. The mailboxes need to just have the correct *UNIX*
permission in order to access the files in the needed way (read or
write). So IMO this could also
Hi again,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Lukas Haase wrote:
[...]
Really? Having uid field used multiple times doesn't work in v1.1+.
Maybe v1.0 code worked differently. But at least you should be aware
of that if you upgrade Dovecot the above settings will break
Hi,
Simple Scenario: Shared namespace and a specific UNIX group should have
access to it. System is Debian lenny (stable).
# cat /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
[...]
namespace public {
separator = .
prefix = Shared.
location = maildir:/var/mail/shared
}
mail_executable =
Hi Timo,
Thank zou for your reply!
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 00:24 +0900, Lukas Haase wrote:
mail_drop_priv_before_exec = no #just to make sure
no means it starts the process as root as root. I guess you meant to
use yes.
I know but I tried both in order to see
Hi again,
I have some additional notes.
Lukas Haase wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
[...]
ACL_GROUPS=`groups $USER | tr ' ' ','`
export ACL_GROUPS
I don't think ACL_GROUPS is supported by Dovecot v1.0.
I removed that part again and instead of using group=office I just
enumerate all
58 matches
Mail list logo
