Hi,
On Tuesday, 8 March 2022 16:12:48 CET Rosario Esposito wrote:
> I setup a dovecot submission server, using xoauth2 authentication.
> My roundcube webmail points to dovecot submission.
> In roundcube smtp logs, I see:
>
[...]
> [08-Mar-2022 15:47:16 +0100]: Send: AUTH XOAUTH2
> dXNlcj1yZXNwb
Hi there,
I was just reading https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/ and noticed that all the
links to the RFCs are broken. I fixed them via regexp search & replace
curl https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/ | sed -e
's|https\?://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc\([0-9]\{4\}\)/\?|https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc\1.html|g'
Hi,
On 2010-11-02 10:30, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> 1. How many of you have a remote site hot backup Dovecot IMAP server?
Only local (same room, different box). Copying to a remote location in
irregular intervals.
> 2. How are you replicating mailbox data to the hot backup system?
> A. rsync
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2010-08-04 23:54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Here: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/eb1f471a924d
Thanks, that's great! Now dovecot enables people who sort server-side
and want IDLE notifications for all those mailboxes, but do not want t
Hi Stan,
On 2010-06-26 03:02 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Steffen Kaiser put forth on 6/25/2010 7:01 AM:
> > 2) thunderbird opened too many simultaneous connections to the server. I
> > do not remember where they would blocked or terminated, but in some
> > cases thunderbird did not seem to detect t
Hi Stan,
On 2010-06-25 07:19 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Patrick Nagel put forth on 6/25/2010 1:02 AM:
> > On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[...]
> >> The first method is a single step process and is reliable.
> >
> > I tried something similar (with Thun
Hi,
On 2010-06-25 03:51 UTC Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Angelo Chen put forth on 6/24/2010 10:25 PM:
> > I think that's one option, but it's around 10G data for the last few
> > years, and more than 100 folders under outlook express, do you think
> > that will be fast enough by using Outlook Express co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2010-05-12 11:31, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> From http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA:
>>
>> "Note that Postfix's mailbox_size_limit setting applies to all files
>> that are written to. So if you have a limit of 50 MB, deliver can't
>> write to log files
I think /etc/passwd is as close as it gets to your requirements... why not just
add the users as system users, and set their shell to /bin/false?
Patrick
"Phil Howard" wrote:
>I'm setting up a Postfix and Dovecot combination. What I want to do is have
>a user database that (1) is not running
Hi Timo,
great hearing from you again, hope the exams went well :)
On 2010-04-13 19:01 UTC Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 9.4.2010, at 9.31, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > 2) Enhancing dovecot's Virtual plugin, so virtual mailboxes do not
> > only get updated on select and expunge, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nikolay,
(I changed my dovecot mailing list subscription from my work mail
account to my private mail account - I'm the guy who started this thread)
On 2010-04-10 15:22, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> On 10.04.2010 11:13, Patrick Nagel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nikolay,
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:12:54 +0400, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> On 09.04.2010 11:19, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> That's great news, thanks for the pointer!:)
>>
>> Inhttp://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-August/041950.ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nikolay,
On 2010-04-09 14:51, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> On 09.04.2010 10:31, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> 1) A new extension of the IMAP protocol: IMAP MULTI-IDLE, which
>> somehow allows a client to get notified of changes to more than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
K-9 Mail (on Android) has been mentioned on this list multiple times
recently, I think it's definitely an IMAP client "on the rise". :) It
supports IMAP IDLE, and so brings "push mail" to Android mobile phone
users. To bring this into the context
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dominique,
On 2010-03-15 12:43, Dominique St-Amand wrote:
> Hello fellow dovecot users!
>
> I have a question for you guys. I have a server running dovecot/exim and I
> allow both pop/pops and imap/imaps. When I look at the running processes, I
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ed,
On 2010-03-05 19:18, Ed W wrote:
> Go on... Why's that..?
>
> Weight of history defines that we do things in certain ways and we
> sometimes get stuck in a bit of a rut, but if M$ has shown us one thing
> it's that we should (cautiously) look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karsten / Guenther,
On 2010-03-06 01:18, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 14:01 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> On 2010-03-05 07:49, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
>>> I don't recall any, other than plain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010-03-05 07:49, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 00:45 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 4.3.2010, at 22.59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>
>>> Do you think I'd break a lot of people's filters if I removed the
>>> prefix? :) Anyone stro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Lev,
On 2010-02-22 16:04, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> This is not a my-email-client-is-better-than-your-email-client thread,
>> I just want to know which client(s) make proper use of imap features
>> for fast searches/copies/deletions etc.
> IMHO, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2010-02-18 23:50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 17:45 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
>> Which modern email client under Linux is working best with dovecot? I
>> just did a grep on User-Agent:/X-Mailer: on my dovecot archive (which
>> g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2010-02-22 03:33, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 21.2.2010, at 21.16, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
>
>> I have an Android Mail App which worked fine with IDLE pushes
>> before (K-9 Mail) under 1.2.10. With 2.0 beta 3 it seems to be
>> looking for an IDLE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ronald,
On 2010-01-05 09:19, Ronald Johnson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running Dovecot 1.2.9 and have noticed the IMAP list command does
> not appear to send a sorted list of folders with list command. For
> example on our Cyrus server I get a sort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dmitri,
On 2009-12-15 04:54, Dmitri V. Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:30:54PM +0100, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
>>> Is there a way do something like that with deliver?
>>
>> why not do it on MTA level? those already have the hooks for it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009-12-11 13:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:51 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> Of course initial training is necessary. For ongoing training /
>> feedback I have set up a Spam/Learn-Spam and Spam/Learn-Ham mailb
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:28:27 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI schrieb:
>> On Qui, 10 Dez 2009, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>>> I'm thinking about filtering all such encoded subjects (as there's no
>>> reason to encode them US-ASCII), but suppose it were UTF-8 or
something:
>>> how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2009-12-10 07:50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Finally fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/9cccb8617820
Great news, thanks! :)
- --
STAR Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.http://www.star-group.net/
Phone:+86 (21) 3462 7688
Hi Gary,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:53:53 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> I used primarily mutt and sendmail for many years. (And elm
> before mutt.) All my mail was saved into ~/Mail. Messages
> from, say, sm...@foo.ber were stored in ~/Mail/smith; all mail
> from smith was cate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
On 2009-11-24 19:27, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 11/23/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
>> Yes, that was my first proposal, but that was also rejected harshly by
>> the other project managers. They
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 11:58, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>>> Shouldn't that be more like:
>>>
>>> reject "this guy is gone"; keep;
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2009-11-24 11:50, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> Someone will probably ask why an auto reply to the same person more than
>> once a day might be necessary. This is why
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-11-24 00:38, Frank Cusack wrote:
> On November 23, 2009 1:19:00 PM +0100 Rene Bakkum
> wrote:
>>Is there an option to for example
>> auto-reply on every mail that is sendto @domain.com?
>
> The part of this question that was overlooke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2009-11-10 15:30, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:21 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> So it seems that neither EXPUNGE nor re-SELECT seems to have any
>> "refreshing"
>> effect.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Timo,
On 2009-11-10 01:56, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 08:03 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> This works for the first time after I edit the dovecot-virtual file and
>> then access the virtual mailbox (all mails I exp
Hi,
I have been experimenting with the Virtual mailboxes plugin [1] recently.
This is my setup: the following dovecot-virtual file exists in a virtual
mailbox called "todo":
-- dovecot-virtual --
*
-Trash
-Trash/*
-Spam
-Spam/*
OR KEYWORD $TODO KEYWORD todo
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 21:41:36 -0700, PGNet Dev wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> It's just not possible, because it doesn't support substring searches.
>> But
>> then again, perhaps no one cares. It's not like gmail's search is IMAP
>> compliant either.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009-09-21 14:21, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
>> -searches across 2GB+ of mail are painfully slow, since it's all
>> server-side
>
> You could improve this with http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
On 2009-09-03 16:38, Richard Hobbs wrote:
> Currently, on our new test server, I am offering IMAP on 143 and POP3 on
> 110.
>
> We would like to enable security on both of these protocols to attempt
> to eliminate the risk from an interna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-08-14 17:36, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> able to see all attachments of all other mail receivers. So this only
>> works in a cooperative environment.
>
> One can extend that scheme a bit.
>
>> In short, a script (implemented as filter, get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-08-13 20:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
[...]
> Again - for shops that must deal with large binary attachments, this
> would be a god-send.
>
> Our max allowed message size is 50MB, and we typically get anywhere from
> 2-10 messages a day cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I completely agree with Michael's opinion.
Patrick.
On 2009-08-11 02:22, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out how exactly v2.0 should be parsing
>> configuration files. The most annoying part is if it should alwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I think the best solution would be, to set up a real mail system on site -
"outsourcing" and having a bad connection just doesn't work.
SMTP is much more suitable for server-to-server delivery than POP and IMAP, in
my experience. It has all the er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Phill,
I know this won't help much, but I can tell you that we have vacation with
cmusieve (CentOS package dovecot-sieve-1.1.6-9.el5) working with dovecot
(1.1.7-0_84.el5) without any problems.
An example how we use it:
- ---
require ["vacation"]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009-05-26 15:31, Timo Sirainen wrote:
|> - mailx: hangs always
|
| Ubuntu mailx doesn't seem to support IMAP. This is some BSD mailx?
He probably refers to http://packages.ubuntu.com/jaunty/heirloom-mailx
Patrick.
- --
STAR Software (Shanghai)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-05-19 23:32, Timo Sirainen wrote:
|> How does imap server should handle search requests with non latin
|> symbols?
|
| It should work correctly.
|
|> Rightnow thunderbird 2.0.0.21 and dovecot1.2rc3 are unable to
|> find any message if I t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stephan,
On 2009-03-21 23:33, Stephan Bosch wrote:
| * Started work on the sieve-filter tool. With this command line tool
| it will be possible to (re-)apply Sieve filters on a mail folder. It
| is currently undocumented and far from fun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-03-04 10:53, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
| Is there a better way to set the \Seen flag other than the global sieve
| script since it can be overridden by the user?
One idea: You could use the Sieve include extension to include the global
scrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roderick,
On 2009-02-07 05:48, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
| At this point I don't think I can do anymore damage to my mail server
| but I'd like to know if anyone else is using the pre-built RPM files
| from ATrpms before I install them?
|
| http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anton,
On 2009-02-02 19:59, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
| Custom imap flags (like $label1, $label2 in mozilla TB) don't saved in maildir
| after upgrade to 1.1.10.
|
| In logs no errors obout this.
|
| With mailbox custom flags works OK.
I found the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-01-08 18:29, Charles Marcus wrote:
| On 1/8/2009, Ed W (li...@wildgooses.com) wrote:
|> I personally suspect Thunderbird, but it's possible that it is related
|> to Dovecot
|
| I have also seen TBird have a corrupt local cache of the file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matthias
Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> The problem with modifying the mail after reclassification persists, hope
>> this
>> can be solved. Then I could also finally move from
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> With postfix, just add bogofilter as transport to master.cf and make it the
>> 'mailbox_transport'.
>
> Does Postfix understand the pipe syntax? If so everythin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Vollmer wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>> An other problem is that each mail needs to be initially classified and
>> due to the fact that sieve is not able to execute external programmes,
>> deliver h
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:21:53 -0700, "Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Does Dovecot have any provision for generating such
> virtual folders? Possibly as the result of a sieve script?
Timo is planning to implement (or is implementing already?) "virtual
mailboxes", see
ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan van den Berg wrote:
> I've done some debugging and attached are (parts) of 2 strace files.
>
> correct.txt. This is when I click on a folder in Outlook and everything is
> OK (no headers are retrieved etc.)
>
> wrong.txt. This is when I click on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
Jan van den Berg wrote:
> We run 1.1.3 and I use Outlook to connect to my IMAP box and a couple of
> times per day (randomly) when I click certain folders IMAP will start
> retrieving ALL headers for that folder again ('retrieving new headers'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> It's safe, but if any IMAP clients had seen the mailbox the first time
>>> they may become confused if the message UIDs change (which is also the
>>> reason Dovecot starts complaining).
>>>
>> Aren't flags only stored in dov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:36 -0500, John Lightsey wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've been rewriting the courier-dovecot-migrate script to handle
>> dovecot->courier conversions in addition to courier->dovecot. One
>> issue I've f
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:07:35 +0300, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to disable this ? I'd like to be able to filter
> all spam by default with sieve, and still allow users to have their own
> rules.
We autocreate a 'mailfilter.sieve' in each new user's homed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wade Smart wrote:
> Im trying to clarify if I understand correctly about authorizing users.
>
> "The simplest login method is sending the user login info in plain
> text and allowing access only to users that already have UNIX access
> (ie. in /etc/pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:51:20 -0700, "Michael Carter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a developer on the Orbited project (http://www.orbited.org), which
> provides a TCPSocket interface in javascript (emulated over HTTP using
> ajax
> and comet.) This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:18:37 -0400, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>
>> When searching for multiple terms at once ("any of") with
>> Thunderbird/Doveco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this may be an obvious logical problem I'm not aware of, which cannot be solved
any more efficiently... but maybe it's just a bug or there is potential for
optimisation in Dovecot (or Thunderbird?).
When searching for multiple terms at once ("an
Hi,
it's always interesting to observe and discuss the different update
strategies (although not entirely on-topic)...
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:25:59 -0500, Eric Rostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 8/6/2008, Eric Rostetter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen wrote:
| On Aug 1, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
|
|> | mailboxes=`printf "1 list "" *\n" | dovecot --exec-mail imap | perl
|> magic`
|>
|> Ok, looks easy. But I can't find information anyw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sahil,
Sahil Tandon wrote:
| Thanks for the tip Patrick. Unfortunately this will not work for me
| because I need to change passwords for virtual users -- the users are not
| system users found in /etc/passwd, but rather virtual users that are
|
Hi Sahil,
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 02:36:56 -0400, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My dovecot is currently configured to authenticate vs. a userdb/passdb
> passwd-file that contains, for each user:
>
> username:passhash:5000:5000::/path/to/home::userdb_mail=/path/to/maildir
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
| printf "1 select $mailbox\n2 search text x93hgdgd\n3 logout\n" |
| dovecot --exec-mail imap
|
| For getting the list of mailboxes:
|
| mailboxes=`printf "1 list "" *\n" | dovecot --exec-mail imap | perl magic`
Ok, looks e
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:38:19 -0700, "Daniel L. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My understanding is that sending a message from a client (use
> Thunderbird for simplicity of this conversation) is performed via SMTP.
> Saving a copy into a sent folder is performed via IMAP (hence the
>
Hi
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:00:05 +0100, Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would be interested in that script, too - are you working on it?
>
> It appears that you can run IMAP commands by piping them into the imap
> process - look at some of Timo's previous posts for examples.
I'm aware of 'd
Hi Jay,
On Monday 14 July 2008, Jay Levitt wrote:
> - If I wrote a script to log in and search for something, and ran it every
> night through cron, would that achieve daily indexing?
I would be interested in that script, too - are you working on it?
Thanks,
Patrick.
--
STAR Software (Shanghai
Hi Timo,
thanks for getting back to me :)
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 16:43 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a complaint from a user today, that a few mails "disappeared" from
> > her Inbox, both whe
Hi,
I got a complaint from a user today, that a few mails "disappeared" from her
Inbox, both when accessing via IMAP with Thunderbird and in the IMAP Webmail
client (RoundCube Webmail, caching deactivated).
Searching (in Subject or From header) within the Inbox turned up the missing
messages t
On Monday 14 July 2008, Horn Wijaya wrote:
> Jul 13 08:19:15 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 13 08:19:18 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 13 08:19:20 hera dovecot: fstat 75 : Value too large for defined data
> type
> Jul 1
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Anders wrote:
> Charles Marcus wrote:
> > Time is critical on servers... you need to fix this. Are you running
> > ntp client (NOT ntpdate)? Is this running in a virtual machine.
>
> If running in a virtual machine, say KVM, what do you propose to do
> about the time issue?
Hi Gavin,
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Mailing List wrote:
> Previously (in v1.0) we did not need the plugin section:
> sieve = mailfilter.sieve
>
> Is this now required even when just wanting to use a global sieve
> script? We have ~100 users so manually adding a mailfilter.sieve file to
> each users
Hi Gavin,
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, you wrote:
> We have been using dovecot v1:1.0.15-1_72 and dovecot-sieve v1.0.3-7
> very successfully for many months but I've been unable to get
> dovecot-sieve to work with the latest 1.1 release. The new release seems
> to completely ignore our global sieve sc
On Tuesday 08 July 2008, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Dovecot LDA has Sieve filtering support. It can save spam in a
> > different folder based on a header added by SpamAssassin.
>
> Is there any docs or informa
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 15:56 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > Then I looked at how Thunderbird implements those tags when using IMAP.
> > It stores them as IMAP keywords. Dovecot stores the first 26 flags in the
> > file
Hi,
currently most people store their messages in some sort of folder hierarchy,
so that they can find them later easily. Here, for example, mails that are
connected to a project are being stored in /CompanyName/ProjectNumber
folders.
Now I was wondering if there is any reason against using ta
Hi Kirti,
On Tuesday 01 July 2008, kbajwa wrote:
> I tried installing Dovecot Sieve Plugin. When I enter the command:
>
> % ./configure --with-dovecot=../dovecot-1.0.7
>
> I get the error:
>
> Error: C processor "lib/cpp" fails sanity check.
>
> I think the problem may be that I am installing wron
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Yes, they have to be selected. There isn't any way currently in IMAP to
> search from multiple mailboxes using a single command, so even if
> Dovecot implemented a Squat index that indexed mails from all mailboxes,
> you'd still have to implement a no
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the FTS (and FTS Squat) plugin today, and it works as advertised.
>
> But: On my 13000 folders with 16 mails maildir I use for testing, the
> speed increase is not as big as one would wish (it still takes se
Hi,
I tried the FTS (and FTS Squat) plugin today, and it works as advertised.
But: On my 13000 folders with 16 mails maildir I use for testing, the
speed increase is not as big as one would wish (it still takes several
minutes to complete a search).
Is my assumption correct, that there is
On Friday 20 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > Now I get this with 1.1.rc10:
> > >
> > > Jun 20 11:53:53 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > > message-parser.c: line 770 (message_parser_parse_next_block):
> > > assertion failed: (ctx->input->eof || ctx->input->closed ||
> > >
Hi,
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> On Thursday 19 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 14:46 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > > Jun 19 14:35:45 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > > message-parser.c: line 620
Hi Timo,
On Thursday 19 June 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 14:46 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> > Jun 19 14:35:45 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
> > message-parser.c: line 620 (preparsed_parse_body_init): assertion failed:
> > (offset &g
Hi,
while a user is searching through his (1.2 GB, >15) mails, I get a lot of
these messages in the log, and the search (with Thunderbird) doesn't finish:
Jun 19 14:35:45 stshamail1 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(username): file
message-parser.c: line 620 (preparsed_parse_body_init): assertion failed
Hi,
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:20:43 +0200, Johannes Berg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 01:17 +0800, Patrick Nagel wrote:
>> I'll give it a try tomorrow... netcat would be the bridge between my
shell
>> and dovecot then, I guess?
>
> That'll
Hi,
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:37:50 +0300, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about making your script use IMAP protocol?
>
> 1 list "" *
> 2 select
> 3 uid search header Disposition-Notification-To ""
> 4 uid store +flags $MDNSent
Thanks, Timo! Never thought of that :)
I'll give it
Hi,
after having moved a big mail archive to IMAP, I've now got the following
problem: The MUA asks to send an MDN on all those old messages that contain
the 'Disposition-Notification-To' header when opened. I'd like to set the
$MDNSent flag on those (>1 in a deeply nested directory structure)
Hi,
I'm a bit confused by the fact that the 'To' header is being modified by sieve
when a message is being redirected.
RFC3028 states in chapter 4.3:
> The "redirect" action is used to send the message to another user at
> a supplied address, as a mail forwarding feature does. The
> "redi
On Monday 26 May 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> To me this sounds like it would be better handled by configuring
> Thunderbird to not use subscriptions at all. Then all mailboxes are
> always listed.
... which can be done by unchecking 'Show only subscribed folders' in Account
Settings / Server Set
Hi,
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/24/2008 Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> > I want this filter for all the users of the system, but I also want
> > to tell dovecot to look in the /home/user/mail/.sieve file for custom
> > per-user filters.
> > Can I do this?
>
> 'Include' supp
Hi Jason,
On Friday 16 May 2008, Jason Fesler wrote:
> > I'm looking for a way to strip attachments from incoming mails on the
> > server.
>
> http://detach.optimism.cc/
>
> works in line with procmail or similiar. It is not a standalone server;
> but instead acts as a filter. I use it in fron
Hi,
I know this is not 100% on-topic, but I'll try anyway...
I'm looking for a way to strip attachments from incoming mails on the server.
The attachments should be stored on a file server (where users have access
via SAMBA) and only a link to the file (UNC path) should remain in the mail
body
Hi,
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Lots of nifty stuff (much improved performance for one thing) in the
> impending 1.1 (currently at rc5)...
>
> If this is a new installation, it might be worth going ahead and
> upgrading to it...
I upgraded again, to 1.1rc5, mostly because of t
Hi,
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Patrick Nagel wrote:
> I'm quite confident this problem will be solved once I put /tmp on the
> harddisk (with plenty of space).
That was indeed it. Now 'deliver' works reliably, from what I can tell after
this short period of time.
Patric
Hi,
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/13/2008, Patrick Nagel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Thanks for that hint. I just upgraded to 1.0.13. I'll watch it carefully
> > and report back here in a few days.
>
> Lots of nifty stuff (much improved perform
Hi Charles,
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/13/2008, Patrick Nagel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'm trying to get dovecot's LDA 'deliver' to deliver mails that come
> > in through a postfix daemon on the same box. I'm talking about
&
Hi,
I'm trying to get dovecot's LDA 'deliver' to deliver mails that come in through
a postfix daemon on the same box. I'm talking
about dovecot version 1.0.rc15 (on CentOS 5 as Linux-VServer guest on a CentOS
5 host).
Configuration
-
# /etc/dovecot.conf
ssl_cert_file: /etc/pki/sel
100 matches
Mail list logo
