ldir args=
But the address in question is still receiving mail - should I be doing
something additional to cease mail delivery?
Thanks in advance!
Tim
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 22:12 +0200, Leon Meßner wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:59:38AM -0700, tcsmith1978 wrote:
> >
> > Hel
THz and TBytes on our desktops)
emails (and array sizes) might exceed everything that we think of today.
Tim
anything like that. I've looked at ACLs too, but they
seem to be more about user access that what Dovecot can do to files.
I could just do this at the filesystem level, but I'd feel a bit happier
about working with Dovecot rather than trying to work around it.
Does anyone have any sugges
uld shed some light on it.
Thanks
Tim
The logs from when I managed to recreate this manually this morning as a test.
Jun 23 09:23:24 tahn dovecot: IMAP(tim): Fixed a duplicate:
/home/tim/Maildir/cur/1308696708.M863172P16126.tahn,S=3761,W=3888:2,S
-> 1308792204.M626641P1992.tahn
Some older
that long (until
the
chroot fails).
Is there any way I can disable this? Again, I've followed the instructions and
set 'chroot=' (empty) for all services, but that hasn't helped.
- Tim
ve. I tested, and all is well...
Sorry about that one, I hate not catching those before I ask you and the
group, but i appreciate your work.
Tim.
On 2/2/2011 1:33 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 11:54 -0800, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> But, it looks like when a new spam e
bject" "[SPAM-TAG]")
{
fileinto "Spam";
stop;
}
Essentially, what is happening is that users are getting their quota
filled up for messages that were in their Spam folder...
Thanks,
Tim.
and here is my dovecot -n output :
# 2.0.7: /usr/local/etc/dovecot
2010/12/7 Timo Sirainen
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:11 +0100, Tim Mauerbach wrote:
>
> > after recent upgrade from 2.0.5 to 2.0.8 it seems that local seen flags
> for
> > mails reside in shared mailboxes doesn´t work anymore.
> ..
> > namespace {
> >
, the other account see the same flags,
immediately.
I read the related wiki pages again and tried to find any configuration
error, unfortunately without much success. I´ve attached output from
"doveconf -n" and a debug logfile.
Thanks a lot!
Tim
# 2.0.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
#
Timo (and others),
It turns out that we had a different set of chain and root ca certs from
godaddy than was required for the proper chain. It seemed to work for
apache, but failed for dovecot...
I really dislike godaddy...
thanks for the help,
Tim.
>> I guess I will go and make su
On 12/2/2010 9:52 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.12.2010, at 5.46, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> So, I guess I'm not sure if it is dovecot or not yet, although it is
>> kind of strange that nothing is written in the logs about the handshake
>> failing.
> Dovecot should
So, I guess I'm not sure if it is dovecot or not yet, although it is
kind of strange that nothing is written in the logs about the handshake
failing.
Tim.
On 12/2/2010 8:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 3.12.2010, at 2.15, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> local 209.132.xx.4 {
>> s
Hi Timo,
I have set up 2.07 to answer on several different IP's with different
SSL certs, like the following :
local 209.132.xx.4 {
ssl_cert =
hat the issue is?
Again, I'm running the latest 8.1 stable FreeBSD on this machine,
although I see the same errors on a 8.0 as well...
Disk isn't full, and it happened at 1:40 am, when there is virtually NO
load on the machine, or on the NFS server.
Thanks,
Tim
On 12/1/2010 10:41 PM,
Thanks Timo,
I've applied the patch, and I'll let it run till tomorrow to see what we
find.
Just so you know, I'm running the latest stable branch of FreeBSD 8.1,
but I'm also seeing the errors on a stable 8.0 machine.
I'll let you know what I see in the logs.
Tim
p in
qmail's queue when the lda gives a fatal error like that?
Thanks,
Tim.
here is my dovecot -n output :
# 2.0.7: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p3 i386
auth_username_format = %Lu
auth_username_translation = %@
auth_verbose = yes
disable_plaintext_auth = no
d
Thanks Timo! That patch did the trick!
Its great that you are so quick with changes that affect your users.
Tim
On 11/22/2010 10:36 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It wasn't really a bug, more like a feature I thought would have been a
> good idea, but wasn't really. Instead of using
does it accidentally think that the quota is actually 0 when
there is a quota_rule?
Thanks,
Tim.
On 11/21/2010 11:39 PM, Tim Traver wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ok, I implemented the feature to allow 100 more MB in the trash, and it
> appears to work for accounts that have a standard quot
Hi all,
ok, I implemented the feature to allow 100 more MB in the trash, and it
appears to work for accounts that have a standard quota, but it appears
it doesn't work with an account that comes back with a 0 quota (meaning
unlimited).
So, I seemed to have fixed one issue, but then on accounts th
decrease their disk
usage and become under quota again...
Thanks,
Tim.
I may have found the issue myself.
It looks like the line before that error line is the quota error that
looks something like this :
Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)
so, that brings the question as to what happens to this email? Does the
dovecot lda bounce it?
Thanks,
Tim.
On 11/19
Hi all,
ok, so I've implemented an after sieve script with the following line
in the plugins area :
sieve_after = /home/mailboxes/sieve/to_spam_folder.sieve
It seems to work ok on some accounts, but then I'm getting the following
error in the deliver error log for many accounts :
Error: sieve:
On 9/2/2010 11:20 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 22:36 -0700, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>
>> As I read down the thread, I realized that many of the posters were
>> pointing out that it shouldn't be used because postfix or qmail can
>> deliver without
d good performance for the end user.
I find it ridiculous that you lashed out at him as a ranter and a troll.
If anything, you labeled yourself as one with those posts.
Tim
older, but it does not get marked as read.
BUT! if I change the order of the actions to mark it as read first, then
move it to the "Billing" folder, it does both of those actions...
Is that the way it is supposed to work? or is that a bug?
Thanks,
Tim.
ng this, but until then you can use the
> managesieve_sieve_capability setting to set this response manually
> (refer to INSTALL file).
Stephan,
Thanks for the workaround. That did the trick, although I would like it
to dynamically determine that list, because I don't know if my list is a
complete one...
Tim.
ric fileinto reject vacation imapflags
notify include envelope body relational regex subaddress copy"
I modified the dovecot sieve config file to try and add (although they
should all be added by default), and it still comes up blank...
Am I missing something?
what might cause it to not broadcast the sieve implementations that it has?
Thanks,
Tim.
On 6/21/2010 12:44 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 22:42 -0700, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>
>> I can't figure out the settings for the log file to have the correct
>> permissions. When the log file is created, it is created owned by root
>> and 0600
Timo,
any thoughts on this one? is there a setting that I am missing for
ownership or permissions of the log files?
Thanks,
Tim.
On 6/18/2010 10:42 PM, Tim Traver wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> ok, using the latest 2.0beta6...
>
> I can't figure out the settings for the log file
Hi Timo,
ok, using the latest 2.0beta6...
I can't figure out the settings for the log file to have the correct
permissions. When the log file is created, it is created owned by root
and 0600 permissions, which doesn't allow the lda to write to it if I
use different users and groups for that main
On 6/18/2010 1:14 AM, A.L.E.C wrote:
> On 18.06.2010 10:00, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> require ["fileinto","copy"];
>> # rule:[SPAM-TAG]
>> if allof ( header :regex "Subject" "^\\[SPAM-TAG\\]")
>> {
>> fileinto
Hi Timo,
ok, when dovecot starts up, it creates the socket files in
/usr/local/var/run/dovecot for the auth and a variety of other socket
stuff you have going on. It creates these socket files with root ownership.
But I have in the config files that dovecot is running as a particular
user (in thi
tting
the error. I guess I just don't quite know what this error means...
I know that the value that it is trying to match is kind of strange, but
it is a regular expression, so it should work...
Thanks,
Tim.
sieve_dir = ~/Maildir/sieve and it stopped having
that error and worked properly...
Maybe the new version is just more picky that everything lines up
properly...
Thanks,
Tim.
On 6/14/2010 5:32 PM, Tim Traver wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ok, I am updating to the 2.0 way of doing things and have m
Hi all,
ok, I am updating to the 2.0 way of doing things and have managed to get
everything set up right, except I am getting the following errors when
attempting to use managesieve with our webmail client (roundcube) that I
didnt get when using dovecot 1.2.11...
Jun 14 17:20:33 managesieve(addr.
>> I hate to be rude but I am going to bump my post. Does anybody have
>> any advice on migrating from vm-pop3d?
>
> Which version of vm-pop3d you use ?
>
vm-pop3d POP3 Server Version 1.1.7f-DA-2
>
> You didn't really seem to have any specific questions.
Sorry. I'll try to be more specific.
My first question is what do to about the mail format. Right now it's
mbox and from reading the migration I understand that having dovecot
point to these files is going to reset the pointers and cause
Hey guys.
I hate to be rude but I am going to bump my post. Does anybody have
any advice on migrating from vm-pop3d?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tim Uckun
Date: Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:48 PM
Subject: converting from vm-pop3d
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Hello All.
I am looking
Hello All.
I am looking into an old server which is running vm-pop3d. This
server is having problems because the pop3 server is taking up 100% of
the CPU. I looked at the largest mailboxes and there are a handful
over 20 megs in size, the largest one is 55megs, they are all mbox
format (I think)
On 3/17/2010 1:21 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 13:19 -0700, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>
>> Since Exim wouldn't be touching the index files, is it safe to leave
>> exim as-is and let it handle the deliveries to the maildirs natively?
>> Exim's already got access to everything it n
Wait, I forgot another quesiton about it...
in the include, does it insert the config code into the section that the
include was called from? for example, if I'm in the middle of the imap
section and decide to include the file, does it treat it like it is
inserted in that location?
Thanks,
Thanks Timo! I couldn't find it in any of the docs but I'm sure its
buried there somewhere...
Tim.
On 5/25/2010 3:16 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 25.5.2010, at 22.48, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>
>> Does dovecot currently have the ability to include another config file
onfig file, so that I
don't have to edit the main config in order to add new IP addresses or
certs...
Does dovecot currently have the ability to include another config file
when it is parsing the main config??? If not, is that something that we
can put on the wish list?
Thanks,
Tim.
s?
I am curious why need to keep 2 files:
dovecot-uidvalidity
dovecot-uidvalidity.4aa4fa4c
since the content of dovecot-uidvalidity is '4aa4fa4c'
why do we need extra files?
Thanks Timo for providing the wonderful dovecot software!
Hope you don't mind my stupid questions.
Sincerely,
Tim Chen
quota. (in reply to RCPT TO
command))"
My speculation is LDA forget the read 'extra fields' from userdb, would you
please help to verify it?
Thanks very much for your help.
Sincerely,
Tim Chen
utine and
return it as userdb_quota variable...
ok, I guess I will try that...
Thanks,
Tim.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 11:56 -0700, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> To refresh the situation, I have a custom checkpasswd routine that
>> retrieves the user information pr
Quota
quota_rule: ?:storage=1GB
I can't figure this one out...
Tim.
Tim Traver wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>> On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:56 AM, Tim Traver wrote:
>>
>>
>>> quota = maildir
>>>
>>> would it look like this :
>>>
>
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:56 AM, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> quota = maildir
>>
>> would it look like this :
>>
>> quota_rule = maildir:
>
> No. http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/1.1 has plenty of examples.
>
Timo,
ok, I had looked at that
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> I figured out something...The issue appeared to have been that no
>> maildirsize file existed. Once I put the maildirsize file in there, then
>> it sent back the quota parameters.
>>
>&
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 18:01 -0700, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> and I get the following back :
>> * QUOTAROOT "INBOX"
>> QUOT1 OK Getquotaroot completed.
>>
>> But I don't see a quota value in there anywhere.
>>
&g
QUOTAROOT "INBOX"
QUOT1 OK Getquotaroot completed.
But I don't see a quota value in there anywhere.
The maildirquota file is in place in the maildir, and has all of the
correct permissions, unless you restrict it to have particular
permissions before you read it...
Thanks,
Tim.
is no QUOTA support for the IMAP server to query for
the quota file...
can someone help me as to a direction to go here??? The reason I need it
is because I believe the web client relies on the QUOTA being in the
CAPA in order to show it...
Thanks,
Tim.
It shed better light on how the
rules work. I guess the best way to get the name portion of the sender
is indeed to use the "header" modifier and pick the correct header field.
Thanks,
Tim.
Thanks Stephen...
lord knows we all need some time on an island without connectivity...
t
Stephan Bosch wrote:
Tim Traver schreef:
Hi all,
ok, downloaded dovecot-1.2.rc5 and compiled it with no problem.
Then, I went to compile the latest dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.5 with it, and
got the
efore that change so I can actually get things to compile?
Thanks,
Tim.
ot# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart
Restarting mail server: dovecotError: Can't use mail executable
/usr/lib/dovecot/imap: No such file or directory
I hope this isn't a serious problem.
Thanks
Tim Legg
I'd rather not have,
and since I already know the home dir when I set up the .qmail-user
file, I'd rather just set it...
help...
Tim.
Tim Traver wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ok, after looking at all of the posts that I've found, and trying
> numerous settings, I am a little st
look something
like this :
|/var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver -f ${SENDER:-<>}
I would rather not do the master authentication socket as described for obvious
reasons.
is there a format in the .qmail file that I can use with deliver to achieve
what I want???
Thanks,
Tim.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:17 -0800, Tim Traver wrote:
>
>> Is it possible that checks for the return code from calling the
>> checkpassword script have changed between the versions??? I currently
>> exit the checkpassword script with _exit(0); t
d...
wierd thing is that it works in 1.1.8, but not in 1.2
Thanks,
Tim.
ctory.
Is it possible to make deliver respect the INDEX setting?
Thanks,
Tim.
--
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:03:41PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 15:51 +0100, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > The ~/Mail folder contains just two folders. The config given to imapd
> > is as follows:
> >
> > MAIL=mbox:/home/cut/jru2/Mail:INBOX=/home/cut/
uot;mail/test"
2 OK List completed.
* BYE Logging out
3 OK Logout completed.
That's with hidden turned on, and the list option turned off.
Am I missing something with my config?
Tim.
--
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:57:04PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:42 PM, Tim Bishop wrote:
>
> >The problem is when a user specifies their own prefix in their mail
> >client (if it's blank there are no problems). If they have ~/Mail none
> >of the
doesn't seem to be doing what I want.
So my question is: is it possible for Dovecot to simply ignore the
folder prefix given by the client?
Thanks,
Tim.
--
Tim Bishop
http://www.bishnet.net/tim/
PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
a little crappy but
works.
Looking for your valuable suggestions!
Thanks very much.
Tim Chen
ge
mail.so if anyone out there knows of oneI would really appreciate
some direction.
Thanks for the help!
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:27:02PM -0400, Tim Riley wrote:
> > Where do I check to make su
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:47:10 -0400
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot + iPhone
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:59:29AM -0400, Tim Riley wrote:
> > I want to start out by saying that Dovecot works 100% when
viewing/moving
> > mail (on our company mail server that I maintain) via Outlook Ex
dovecot version: 1.0.13 (RPM from http://atrpms.net/)
protocol: IMAP
dovecot -n:
# 1.0.13: /etc/dovecot.conf
log_path: /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
listen: *removed*
ssl_cert_file: /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem
ssl_key_file: /etc/pki/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem
login_dir: /usr/local/var/run/do
it as a bug. I don't
follow the list so if you need any more info, please copy my email on the
reply. Thanks...
--
Tim Boyer
Chief Technology Officer
Denman Tire Corporation
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/19/2008, Tim Alberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The possibilities for sharing emails in groups seem endless to me,
but it depends on if it's a 'use' or 'abuse' of the IMAP protocol,
and if Dovecot in-particular is designed to be able t
I'm finishing converting from POP to IMAP and I'm seeing some
potentially powerful uses, but I wonder if my ideas aren't more abuses.
I want to create 'multi-user' accounts that allow groups of users to
archive and share emails with each other.
For example, in the case of a sales department,
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-12-2008 11:07 AM Tim Alberts spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-10-2008 6:09 PM Tim Alberts spake the following:
I'm moving to IMAP and trying to understand all the details of
where to save email. The system is CentOS running sendmail -
procmail
Diego Liziero wrote:
Hi,
I'm collecting users feedback of latest dovecot 1.1.rc3 development release.
Some users are complaining that their sent mails sometimes don't get
written to imap Sent-mail folder.
I'm having that exact trouble with Usermin as I just posted a follow up
to an old iss
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-10-2008 6:09 PM Tim Alberts spake the following:
I'm moving to IMAP and trying to understand all the details of where
to save email. The system is CentOS running sendmail - procmail
which delivers as:
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
I'm trying also to use User
I'm moving to IMAP and trying to understand all the details of where to
save email. The system is CentOS running sendmail - procmail which
delivers as:
DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/
I'm trying also to use Usermin as the webmail client. I can get mail to
deliver to $HOME/Maildir/ and I can get clie
Fixed, upgraded to 1.0.10 from rpm at www.atrpms.net and running now.
Thank you for your support.
Running CentOS Linux 5 with sendmail-procmail putting email in
/var/spool/mail. I'm running pop3 only with the servers configured to
authenticate with ldap (which is configured and running OK). I do have
this same configuration on an older FC6 box and it works fine. I'm
thinking I just need
to point the finger at dovecot not being able to
read userPassword but since no debugging information can be extracted,
I have to assume.
A working example as I have asked for above would probably help me
alot.
thanks!
--Tim
If opportunity doesn't knock, build a door.
"I can" is a
orted, will it be in the near future?
Note: We are using Centos 5 and Redhat 5 systems.
Tim Tyler
Network Engineer - Beloit College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 14, 2008 8:00 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 16:57 +0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > 1. When specifying quota_rule = *, it warns
> > FQuota root QUOTA: Invalid rule: *
> > when starting dovecot.
>
> What about quota_r
On Jan 14, 2008 4:16 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:29 +0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> Use the migration script, which tries to preserve the UIDLs.
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Courier
Thanks I will give it a try.
>
> > 2. Cur
settings for different groups of users. Is this a bug of v1.1? Or should
I
use v1.0 instead? Will v1.1 fix this bug in the future?
Best regards,
Tim Chen
Tim Alberts wrote:
I'll add Usermin (http://webmin.com/usermin.html) to the list, which
is part of the webmin (http://webmin.com/) program. It's more than
just a web based email client, but you can limit features that you
don't want users to access.
Out of curiosity, I Ya
I'll add Usermin (http://webmin.com/usermin.html) to the list, which is
part of the webmin (http://webmin.com/) program. It's more than just a
web based email client, but you can limit features that you don't want
users to access.
1.10 seems to work.
Tim
At 03:30 AM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 07:41 +0100, Claude Frantz wrote:
> Hello !
>
> The problem with "Too many open files" has disappeared here when using
> the version dovecot.i386 1:1.0.9-0_65.fc7 on a system running Fedora 7
commercial linux company in the
stability of what they release.
Tim
At 10:00 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
On 1/8/2008, Tim Tyler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We just recently deployed Dovecot 1.0.rc15
Ouch... old... upgrade...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Tim Tyler
Network Engineer - Beloit College
[EMAIL
ovecot/imap
mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
Any solutions for this problem?
Tim Tyler
Network Engineer - Beloit College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the last time a pop3 connection was established for each user when
using Dovecot?
Tim Tyler
Network Engineer - Beloit College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'd be really grateful if someone running a dovecot IMAP (or IMAPS) server
could tell me exactly how their email folders are arranged.
What is the mail_location setting in /etc/dovecot.conf ?
On my home one, I left it blank.
On a system at another site, I have it set to
Timothy Murphy wrote:
1. I see my email fine on my laptop in an IMAPS account,
but it doesn't get updated - I mean I don't get any new email -
until I run kmail on my server.
Is that because kmail is downloading it from your ISP/email host using POP3?
What I assume you are trying to do is ho
Dave McGuire wrote:
On Aug 26, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Several good centralized software management schemes have been around
for a very, very long time. I don't use *any* "package management"
systems...they are more trouble than they're worth. The very
existence of this threa
it's not as clean as I'd like but seems to do the trick.
The only other thing that got me really confused was passwd schemes. I
am migrating vpopmail password database and I had to specify MD5 in
dovecot-sql.conf.
Thanks,
Tim
Tim Tsai wrote:
I am almost done migrating to a new
need a default for each
type of authentication.
My virtual users are in /var/vmail/domain/user and my system users are
in /home/user/Maildir
any ideas? I can get one or the other to work but not both at this point.
Thanks,
Tim
Curtis Maloney wrote:
Tim Bates wrote:
If I copy message files (from a command prompt) will dovecot get
upset or confused? Do I need to delete index files or anything like
that?
I ask because I need to restore some messages from a backup, but not
restore the entire maildir. I tried some the
If I copy message files (from a command prompt) will dovecot get upset
or confused? Do I need to delete index files or anything like that?
I ask because I need to restore some messages from a backup, but not
restore the entire maildir. I tried some the other day as a test, but
the user is saying
he least common eliminator initially.
If getting a new server isn't an option, Xen and VPS environments have
made provisioning a new server very cheap nowadays...
Tim
Congratulations Mr. Sirainen. Tell the Fedora folks to make an RPM
update for FC6.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.4.2007, at 20.31, Tim Alberts wrote:
Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): dovecot-auth:
../../../libraries/liblber/io.c:491: ber_get_next: Assertion
`ber->ber_buf == ((void *)0)' failed.
Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default):
pam(se
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.4.2007, at 19.48, Tim Alberts wrote:
Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): dovecot-auth:
../../../libraries/liblber/io.c:491: ber_get_next: Assertion
`ber->ber_buf == ((void *)0)' failed.
Apr 4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default):
pam(se
101 - 200 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
