On 10/14/2022 3:13 PM, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
here, to date,
https://radicale.org/v3.html
is very well behaved.
Looking over radicale, i only see the option for plain text or MD5
passwords. I don't see an option to have authentication against an
existing DB, like the same used for
ilaszewski wrote:
Hi
Probably netapp fas8200 not support NFS 4.2 and NFS 4.1 not support auth
via exports (only kerberros)
On 28.01.2021 19:45, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 1/28/2021 11:14 AM, Maciej Milaszewski wrote:
Hi
For test I crete a new director with 2.3.13 and node 2.3.13 I mount
stora
On 1/28/2021 11:14 AM, Maciej Milaszewski wrote:
Hi
For test I crete a new director with 2.3.13 and node 2.3.13 I mount
storage via nfs with this same options:
rw,sec=sys,noexec,noatime,tcp,hard,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,intr,nordirplus,nfsvers=3,tcp,actimeo=120
I create a simple MTA and
You might consider adding "stop;" after the fileinto, otherwise
a second match might process the message again, moving it
elsewhere, etc.
Tom.
On 10/30/2020 5:47 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Answering to myself,
The issue was as a result of a config parameter for SOGo:
Changed
My understanding is that the only FTS search provider that supports
substrings is the legacy fts-squat. All the others perform only full
tokenized search.
I think it's possible to configure multiple fts providers, so they
can "cascade". But my installation is small enough that I only use
preallocation ignores several other expected errors.
On 10/9/2017 6:09 PM, Ricardo Branco wrote:
Mail server runs centos 6.9 and so does the nfs servers, it is using nfsv3 on
mount, underlining fs is xfs.
On 9 October 2017 23:00:42 BST, Tom Talpey <t...@talpey.com> wrote:
What OS are you r
What OS are you running doveadm on, and what type of NFS server is
hosting the storage?
One possibility on (much) older NFS servers is that some of them refuse
to extend a file when setting the file length to a larger value than
the current size. However, that's a really obsolete behavior, not
On 12/30/2016 11:03 AM, Michael Fox wrote:
doveadm expunge -u mailbox '*' savedbefore 30d
That doesn't work for me either. The command is accepted, but the messages
are not expunged.
Huh, it certainly did for me, although I used "all" instead of
"savedbefore 30d" since I just wanted to
On 12/29/2016 10:23 PM, Michael Fox wrote:
But is there a way tell it all mailboxes for a user? For example,
something
like:
doveadm expunge -u user@domain mailbox ALL savedbefore 30d
try:
doveadm expunge -u user@domain ALL savedbefore 30d
just like the example thats here:
On 11/28/2016 3:28 PM, Volker Wysk wrote:
Hi!
"Dovecot always logs a detailed error message if something goes wrong.
If it doesn't, it's considered a bug and will be fixed." (http://
wiki2.dovecot.org/Logging)
I'm trying to set up a spam filter with dovecot-antispam and dspam as backend.
When
On 11/8/2016 10:59 AM, The Doctor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:38:42AM -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 11/8/2016 2:24 AM, A.L.E.C wrote:
On 08.11.2016 08:04, The Doctor wrote:
In another account, I see lots of white items in RoundCude as if these items
are
hidden from Thunderbird hance
On 11/8/2016 2:24 AM, A.L.E.C wrote:
On 08.11.2016 08:04, The Doctor wrote:
In another account, I see lots of white items in RoundCude as if these items
are
hidden from Thunderbird hance blocking the IMAP Client from deleting e-mails.
I guess these "white items" are messages marked as
On 6/27/2016 2:45 AM, Mark Foley wrote:
While continuing to test gssapi, I thought I check out your suggestion on NTLM
v1. I did set
Thunderbird to NTLM v1 ...
You are aware, I hope, that NTLM v1 is well over 20 years old and
is trivially compromised today. Basically, it's about as secure as
Kawada-san, have you seen this page?
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting
You will need to write some shell code to determine the expiration, but
it has examples of similar actions, including sending an ALERT.
On 6/8/2016 4:58 AM, mkaw...@redhat.com wrote:
Alec-san,
Eexcuse me for my
On 5/17/2016 8:57 AM, Andrew Watkins wrote:
...
Background I am using Solaris 11 ZFS & SMB for my users home files with
Solaris SMB protocol mandatory locking (nbmand=on)
If I turn nbmand=off then I do not get any errors, so it is to do with
SMB locking.
Posix doesn't have mandatory locking,
On 8/18/2015 11:37 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 18/08/2015 17:25, Tom Talpey ha scritto:
On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi,
in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on
your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of
write
On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi,
in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on
your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of
write operations.
If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR,
this
On 4/8/2015 8:18 AM, John Perry wrote:
I found the developer's page:
http://johannes.sipsolutions.net/Projects/dovecot-antispam
That project forked, and there are two versions now. They have
subtly different configuration parameters, which trips folks up.
See also:
On 8/27/2014 7:31 AM, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
Zitat von Martin Vegter martin.veg...@aol.com:
On 08/27/2014 11:22 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Martin Vegter wrote:
This looks like 4 separate sessions are created when I log in from one
client.
Is this normal behavior?
On 7/27/2014 1:16 PM, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 07/27/2014 05:08 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm running postfix + dovecot + dovecot-pigeonhole
on my CentOS-7 home server.
I would like spam to finish up in ~/Maildir/.Spam/ .
Spam is being marked, but is not separated -
it ends up with all the other
On 7/10/2013 8:09 AM, Tommy Wareing wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:33:55AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-07-10 5:28 AM, Tommy Wareing tom...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I'm trying to install Dovecot onto my QNAP NAS.
Did you create the dovenull user, which is needed by 2.1+? I ran
On 7/10/2013 9:22 AM, Tommy Wareing wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:42:20AM -0400, Tom Talpey wrote:
On 7/10/2013 8:09 AM, Tommy Wareing wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:33:55AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-07-10 5:28 AM, Tommy Wareing tom...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I'm trying
I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty
obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide those.
In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I also see some of these in 2.1.1):
1) src/lib-index/mail-cache-fields.c
(comparison between two last_used fields)
On 3/15/2012 12:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.3.2012, at 18.04, Tom Talpey wrote:
I'm seeing a few warnings emitted when building for x86. They're pretty
obvious, but if you want the configure options etc, I can provide those.
In Dovecot 2.1.2 (I also see some of these in 2.1.1):
Thanks
I see a new POP3C lib-storage client backend in dovecot 2.1, but I
don't see anything in the 2.1 doc directory or in the wiki. Can this
be used to synchronize dovecot with external pop servers? Doing away
with my current fetchmail and lmtp solution for this would be quite
interesting.
Thanks for
On 12/22/2011 7:06 AM, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
Am 22.12.2011 um 12:59 schrieb Stephan Bosch:
That is why I didn't explicitly announce this change. The .sieve extension only has significance in the filesystem (to make
sure that the Sieve interpreter refuses to open anything but Sieve scripts).
The Upgrading page has lots of information on this, and the doveconf
command listed at the very top of that page worked great for me to
create a new dovecot.conf. It produces lots of commentary to help sort
things out.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0
On 3/23/2011 3:21 PM, Carlos
On 3/8/2011 11:55 AM, Knute Johnson wrote:
On 03/06/2011 03:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 7.3.2011, at 1.39, Dave McGuire wrote:
That said, I've been testing Timo's imap_capabilities suggestion
for about the past 45mins, and it seems to solve the problem for
me, at least so far.
So it
On 3/8/2011 12:52 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-03-08 12:47 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
(dovecot 2.0.11 / TB 3.0.4)
I think you're on to something here.
You do need to update TB too you know...
The number of bugs squashed since 3.0.4 are too vast too even begin to
contemplate...
It's
On 2/28/2011 1:56 PM, Christoph Pleger wrote:
Hello,
How can I look at the timestamps? By opening my database with sqlite3 and then
enter select * from expires;? I did that and it showed:
christoph|Trash|1298917682
How can I check if this timestamp is correct? It is not really human readable.
When building Pigeonhole 2.2 for ARM, the following warnings are
produced:
uri-mailto.c: In function '_parse_hex_value':
uri-mailto.c:139: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
uri-mailto.c:145: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of
On 1/10/2011 4:17 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.1.2011, at 23.09, Zhou, Yan wrote:
The problem is that we have no way to enforce STARTTLS on 110, user can
connect to DoveCot on port 110, sending user credential without STARTTLS
(thus insecure).
default_plaintext_auth = yes
It's the
On 12/23/2010 3:13 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I wonder if there's any way to do this. Say there are two different
storage devices mounted as follows:
/slow-hard-drive/email-directory
/fast-ssd-drive/email-directory
Now suppose there were a way to join these drives so that you could
access them as
On 12/20/2010 6:42 PM, Tom Lieuallen wrote:
I have a centrally located shared imap folder location. We have several
maildir folders with different file system permissions.
...
Is there any way to configure dovecot such that if a person moves or
copies a message to another imap folder, it
I got around to trying the 0.2.2 managesieve listener and it's not
working for me. As soon as the client authenticates, the connection
is closed and the following is logged on the server:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace
On 12/13/2010 12:06 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 13.12.2010, at 17.01, Tom Talpey wrote:
Dec 13 11:48:30 managesieve(x...@yy.com): Error: user x...@yy.com:
Initialization failed: Namespace 'Mobile/': Unknown mail storage driver virtual
I do have such a virtual namespace defined
My dovecot logs revealed a crash in the dovecot/imap process a few
days ago. It appears to have dereferenced 0x0004 in the storage
shared lib. Unfortunately, I didn't get a core and I'm not sure how
to reproduce it. Dovecot 2.0.8 on linux32.
Two questions:
1) How can I be sure I get a core
On 12/9/2010 10:31 AM, Ron Leach wrote:
Tom Talpey wrote:
On 12/5/2010 2:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's also safe to run v1.2 and v2.0 in parallel, even accessing the
same index files.
So, I just installed 2.0.8 on a separate server and deployed a test user
or two.
Did you leave both
On 12/9/2010 2:10 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Tom Talpeytmtal...@gmail.com:
I ended up not trying to deploy both 1.2 and 2.0 dovecot servers on the
same machine. Even after mangling the various configure options to let
the bin, sbin, lib and libexec directories coexist, the /var and /etc
On 12/5/2010 2:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.12.2010, at 16.40, Tom Talpey wrote:
I am running Dovecot 1.2.16 and considering moving up to 2.0.8.
I have foundhttp://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0 but there's
not a lot about deploying a 2.0 server alongside an existing 1.2.
Any hints
On 12/6/2010 6:18 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
The new Dovecot v2.0.8 release has a few changes that prompted changes
in Pigeonhole as well. This means that a new release of Pigeonhole is
also necessary, because otherwise things will not compile anymore.
Thanks! It builds and runs well for me, but
I am running Dovecot 1.2.16 and considering moving up to 2.0.8.
I have found http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0 but there's
not a lot about deploying a 2.0 server alongside an existing 1.2.
Any hints on a seamless approach to this, especially one that might
allow me to upgrade individual
On 12/3/2010 10:55 AM, Mart Pirita wrote:
Timo Sirainen kirjutas:
I wonder if this is the reason for all your trouble.. Are there some
old OpenSSL versions still installed? Maybe it's mixing headers of old
OpenSSL with libs of new, or vice versa.
...
The last good OpenSSL is
On 12/3/2010 11:23 AM, Mart Pirita wrote:
Tom Talpey kirjutas:
I built 1.2.16 against openssl-0.9.8p just last week; it linked
and is running fine for me. Have you tried any version after 0.9.8l?
Tested with openssl-0.9.8m, 0.9.8q, 1.0.0a, 1.0.0c, config options are
simple:
./config
On 12/2/2010 11:44 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.12.2010, at 16.22, Tim Traver wrote:
Dec 02 06:59:12 lda(mar...@x.com): Error: ostream: write(0x284eb000,
8009) failed
Oh. I thought it might have been something more exotic, like writev() or
pwrite(). But this is about as basic as it
On 12/3/2010 12:46 AM, Tim Traver wrote:
Timo,
ok, I have more info from your suggestion to use the openssl test client
connect.
I do have about a dozen more configs on different IP's, and they seem to
work. I just didn't include them.
I get the following error when trying to connect to that
On 11/30/2010 10:30 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
I am running dovecot 1.2.16 and not able to figure out an error
that happens whenever I select the root of a virtual mailbox tree.
FWIW, I have discovered a workaround. By manually unsubscribing the
Mobile virtual mailbox (had to edit the ...Maildir
I am running dovecot 1.2.16 and not able to figure out an error
that happens whenever I select the root of a virtual mailbox tree.
At the moment I have a simple maildir store, accessed via IMAP, and
have successfully added a virtual fs namespace with two subdirectories.
I have created
48 matches
Mail list logo
