It was the three passdb blocks you sent me.
On 10/22/2019 4:43 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Can you show what you ended up pasting?
Aki
On 22.10.2019 11.34, Steve Matzura via dovecot wrote:
I pasted that block at the end of dovecot.conf, restarted, and got the
following in syslog:
Oct
in process
exited, code=exited, status=89/n/a
Oct 22 08:24:32 tgvprod systemd[1]: dovecot.service: Failed with result
'exit-code'.
On 10/22/2019 4:00 AM, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
block quote
On 22.10.2019 10.33, Steve Matzura via dovecot wrote:
block quote
Sorry for having lost the or
.140] ([108.41.57.11])
by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA
id MnpFiaSdxUnHgMnpFiYE6m; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:39:25 -0700
To:
r...@theglobalvoice.info
From: Steve Matzura
Subject: Testing again
Message-ID:
<61b4f0c2-89fa-c4de-8288-871a8708f...@noisynotes.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 02:39:26 -04
I had Dovecot running very well on Ubuntu 14.04. Then I decided that
since That version of Ubuntu was now out of support, I would build a new
server on 18.04, which has been done.
I thought I could take the old dovecot.conf and everything in conf.d
that had been customized and drop it in plac
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:53:33 -0600
Roger Klorese via dovecot wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:19 PM Steve Litt via dovecot
> wrote
>
> >
> > They only see some of the folders.
>
>
>
> Are they subscribed?
I don't know.
I looked up how to subscri
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:39:31 -0400
Dave McGuire via dovecot wrote:
> On 9/23/19 8:36 PM, Steve Litt via dovecot wrote:
> > Thunderbird is an absolute pig, taking hours to load my Dovecot
> > IMAP. Claws-mail is good, but I have some problems with it. Alpine
> > appears not
wrote:
> Why not use thunderbird (or any other IMAP talking client)? :-)
>
>
> Ionel
>
> On 24.09.19 00:14, Steve Litt via dovecot wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I could really use a file manager or browser to browse my Dovecot
> > IMAP. Ideally it would have
of such a file manager or browser for IMAP?
SteveT
Steve Litt
Author: The Key to Everyday Excellence
http://www.troubleshooters.com/key
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
Hi all,
I use Claws-Mail to look inside my local (same metal) Dovecot server.
All incoming mail is dumped into Dovecot folders via procmail.
All of a sudden today, mass purges of "marked for delete" happen about
5 times faster. The process used to be a significant productivity
destroyer, but now
unds = delay-newmail
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
}
protocol pop3 {
mail_max_userip_connections = 10
pop3_client_workarounds = outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh
}
Please help!
Thanks so much
Steve
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 5:34 AM, Marc Stürmer wrote:
>
> Am 2018-04-09 00:55, schrieb Steve Atkins:
>
>> Will a simple backup of all the files of an multi-dbox give me a
>> consistent state when I recover, or do I need to do something (e.g.
>> lock writes to the
ushing it to offsite buckets so I'd prefer to avoid backing up the
entire thing locally, then copying that offsite).
Cheers,
Steve
Mail, which is
very fast, create two accounts: One for the old IMAP, one for the new
one, and just copy trees.
SteveT
Steve Litt
November 2017 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:52:51 +0100 (CET)
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:04:22 -0600 (CST) Greg Rivers
> > wrote:
> >> $ strings $(whence alpin
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:04:22 -0600 (CST)
Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Steve Litt wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > Alpine still gives me a bad cert warning, saying I should either
> > fix it or disable checking. I haven't yet found a way to get Alpine
>
hould either fix it
or disable checking. I haven't yet found a way to get Alpine to
discriminate between a valid self-signed cert and a bad one.
Anyway, all's good.
SteveT
Steve Litt
November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
way to organize
things is in a hierarchy, like a room of file cabinets, a Linux
filesystem, or a computer menu.
SteveT
Steve Litt
November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:14:02 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > I have over 620K emails in over 1000 folders. This turns Thunderbird
> > into an all day affair, just to refresh its caches.
>
> There are lots of knobs you can tweak to
un
> roundcube, given I got hacked via an unpatched roundcube back when I
> was using a hosting company. Webmail just increases your attack
> surface.
Thanks.
My reason for exploring Alpine is I'm moving away from Claws, for
non-technical reasons I won't burden this list wit
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 08:52:11 +0100 (CET)
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > What email clients are all of you using to look at your IMAP
> > email?
>
> https://de.wikipedia
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:11:45 +0100
Jochen Bern wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 08:48 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > When I use an email client, its purpose is as a window into my
> > Dovecot IMAP, and as a mechanism to reply to and send emails. I
> > don't do filtering or cale
IMAP email?
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt
November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
ou could switch to Devuan. Or do what I do: Run Void
Linux, which ships with Runit actually performing PID1 init duties as
well as process supervision.
SteveT
Steve Litt
March 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:14:08 +0200
Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 21.02.2016 19:10, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:03:15 +0100
> > Thomas Leuxner wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >> https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/53cc71cae88ee81f
onalities have become dependent
on systemd. Is this discussion simply about the unit file and PID file
location for Dovecot under systemd's process manager, or is Dovecot
starting to acquire systemd dependencies that will make it difficult to
run without systemd in the future?
Thanks,
SteveT
S
/ >/What purpose does vpopmail serve that dovecot alone does not? Isn't it
just an ancient leftover from historic qmail times?
qmail and vpopmail are still quite prominent on the Internet. I see no reason
to change my setup at the moment. Possibly I could re-architect to read user
info dire
for this great tool!
SteveT
Steve Litt
November 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques
of the Successful Technologist
http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques
Hi all,
Thanks for making Dovecot.
I just transitioned from Debian Wheezy to Void Linux. It was fairly
easy to get Dovecot working on my Void box, and having Dovecot makes
all of my email activities easier by doing one thing and doing it right.
Thank you for such great software.
SteveT
ther parts of this thread you ask how to separate backups from
different accounts from different computers. As far as accounts, I
think that Maildir directory structures would take care of that. As far
as different machines, just put the hostname at the front of each
destination directory.
SteveT
Steve
I neglected to include this log entry, which comes immediately after
Dovecot reports successful user login authentication:
Jun 18 10:39:16 dovecot: imap(admin): Error: User
initialization failed: Namespace 'Public/': mkdir(/var/vmail/public)
failed: Permission denied (euid=1000(admin) egid=1002(v
Most of my users are virtual. Do I need defined namespaces or is the
default undefined one OK?
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:24:32 +0200, you wrote:
>I think "private/dovecot-lmtp" isn't found. Please compare your Dovecot
>socket configuration and Postfix-main.cf configuration to
>http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
I had it set up that way, but found extra lines in 10-master.conf.
Here's a maillog entry that's one of many I receive when I try sending
a test message to my system. The recipient is a virtual user in
/etc/virtual. The way I'm expecting it to work is that my message from
me to this Postfix virtual user will be sent back to me. Every time
the message delivery is a
Please ignore last message.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:10:26 -0400, you wrote:
>Please send the output of postconf -n to the mailing list.
Paul: I purposefully obfuscated my FQDN and domain, but they both have
real and good data in them.
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/var/lib/mailman/d
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:45:25 +, you wrote:
>Those pieces are all part of the postfix MTA (you haven't indicated
>your OS, but postfix is the current default on most current linux
>distributions).
Fedora 20. Soon upgrading to 22.
>As I indicated earlier, by default most (current) MTA installs
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:35:34 +, you wrote:
>>From everything you've indicated, this is an MTA issue.
I see that. OK, on to the other list. Thanks.
't a firewall rule preventing
>this.
Connect failed.
>On 06/16/15 10:44, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of
>> delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a
>> valid or relayed user at my remo
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:02:29 +0200, you wrote:
>Am Dienstag, den 16.06.2015, 11:44 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>> The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of
>> delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a
>> valid or relayed user a
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:31:07 +, you wrote:
>By default, most MTAs only listen to localhost, so don't accept
>externally derived mail. Try telnetting to port 25 on the machine
>from some place off your machine's network. If you get a "hang",
>it's likely a firewall issue. If you get a "connecti
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:27:58 -0500, you wrote:
>No attempt to deliver almost always means either:
>- a DNS problem; the sender can't find the destination, or finds the
>"wrong" destination.
That would be interesting, since I tried both the actual IP address
and the DNS name for the test node. Nei
The next phase of my testing procedure involves the simple act of
delivering mail to my test box. When I send a message to either a
valid or relayed user at my remote machine's address, it never gets
there. I know this virtually for sure because I'm tailing
/var/log/maillog and nothing new has been
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 21:11:39 +0200, you wrote:
>Am 15.06.2015 um 20:26 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
>> Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 13:33 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>>> I think I have it now! Found info about *correctly* defining
>>> namespaces. I now get the following whe
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:26:28 +0200, I wrote:
>> Trying 127.0.0.1...
>> Connected to 127.0.0.1.
>> Escape character is '^]'.
>> * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
>> IDLE STARTTLS AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready.
>> a login
>> a OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-
I think I have it now! Found info about *correctly* defining
namespaces. I now get the following when telnetting in, and it all
looks valid.
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
IDLE STARTTLS AUT
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:47:03 -0400, you wrote:
>Im assuming you found "doveadm" ?
I did.
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:42:47 +0200, you wrote:
>
>
>
>>> passdb {
>>>driver = passwd-file
>>>args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users
>>> }
>
>have you created/generated a password to be used with the crypt scheme?
>
>you can use doveadm pw for this.
No. I should try that
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:22:13 +0200, you wrote:
>> Now, when I telnet 127.0.0.1 143 and attempt to log in with the
>> string:
>>
>> a login
>>
>> whether it's one in my users file or not, I get:
>>
>> a NO [AUTHENTICATIONFAILED] Authentication failed.
>>
>
>Logs might give you a clue what exactly
What is the reasoning behind that `<' anyway? It just appears so odd
that a path should have that at its front.
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:20:25 +0200, you wrote:
>Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 07:38 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>> If I could remove this message from this list, I woul
I wrote that. A missing `<' in front of the path to the main
certificate file.
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:44:39 +0200, you wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:38:26AM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> If I could remove this message from this list, I would! I just figured
>> out w
Instructions at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/BasicConfiguration say the
next thing to test after getting IMAP and Telnet working is to create
a dummy user file with the following command:
echo "$USER:{PLAIN}password:$UID:$GID::$HOME" > users
And place it in /etc/dovecot and protect it appropriately.
If I could remove this message from this list, I would! I just figured
out what my problem was, and it's something I thought *FOR SURE* I had
fixed. I've looked at this thing so many times, I fell into the trap
of not seeing the forest for the trees. I had inadvertently omitted
the '<' before the f
Someone, I don't remember whether it was Alex or Urban, asked me to
check on my private keyfile to see if it began with "Begin RSA private
key". I reported that it does not. Now here's where things get
strange: When I ran the command:
$ openssl req -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -sha1 -keyout myserver.ke
Gere's the command I used to generate the CSR. It is really one line,
even though your message display program may cause it to wrap midway:
openssl req -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -sha1 -keyout myserver.key -out
server.csr
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:30:40 -0500, you wrote:
>I think I saw mention of "notepad" previously. If this is the case there may
>be some "dos" formatting that is messing things up.
I didn't do it with Notepad. In fact, I did it on the Linux system in
question using nano.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:56:37 +0200, you wrote:
>IMHO the easiest way to do this:
>cat mydomain_cert.pem intermediate_cert.pem > new_cert_bunddle.pem
OK, just tried it. The resultant catted file is identical to the one I
created with a text editor.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:56:37 +0200, you wrote:
>IMHO the easiest way to do this:
>cat mydomain_cert.pem intermediate_cert.pem > new_cert_bunddle.pem
OK, but only one of my files is in .PEM format. I'll do this and get
back to you in about 45 minutes.
The public cert part is good, but the private one begins with "Begin
private key", not "RSA key."
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:54:23 +0200, you wrote:
>Am 13.06.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:57:06 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>>&
Alex, et al.,
I spoke too soon. Upon close examination of /var/log/maillog, the
errors previously reported via the maillog extracts only happen when I
attempt to test the imap connection. Everything appears correctly set
up, defined, etc. It's now down to the certificates themselves I
think. I hav
Urban:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:58:57 +0200, you wrote:
>
>> ssl_cert = /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/tbv2015.crt
>This is not correct. It should be:
>
>ssl_cert =
That one was my fault. That's what it is inside 10-ssl.conf, but
because I typed the mail message manually, I forgot the `<'.
It appears, h
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:57:06 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 03:41:26PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> >> > > Trying ::1... # this is certainly suspect
>> >> > > Escape character is '^['.
>> >> > > Connection closed by
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 20:41:01 +0200, you wrote:
>Am Samstag, den 13.06.2015, 13:40 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:16:30 +0200, you wrote:
>>
>> > Am Samstag, den 13.06.2015, 08:00 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>> > >
>> > >
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:28:53 -0500, you wrote:
>
>On Jun 13, 2015, at 7:16 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote:
>
>> Am Samstag, den 13.06.2015, 08:00 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>>>
>>> All of the above specified settings are correct. Yet, when I telnet
>>>
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 13:59:25 -0400, you wrote:
>On 06/13/2015 01:41 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:36:21 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>> Look at /etc/hosts ::1 is the ipv6 version of localhost.
>> Right. I actually knew that. So why does that take prece
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 10:36:21 -0600, you wrote:
>Look at /etc/hosts ::1 is the ipv6 version of localhost.
Right. I actually knew that. So why does that take precedence for the
definition of localhost even though it's not the first line in the
file?
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:16:30 +0200, you wrote:
>Am Samstag, den 13.06.2015, 08:00 -0400 schrieb Steve Matzura:
>>
>> All of the above specified settings are correct. Yet, when I telnet
>> localhost 143, I get:
>>
>> Trying ::1... # this is certain
te.d/syslog and other things.
>On 13 Jun 2015 15:02, "Steve Matzura" wrote:
>
>> My /var/log/maillog was getting pretty big because of lots of testing
>> and re-configuring I've been doing lately with both Dovecot and
>> Postfix. I figured just remove /var/l
My /var/log/maillog was getting pretty big because of lots of testing
and re-configuring I've been doing lately with both Dovecot and
Postfix. I figured just remove /var/log/maillog and it would be
re-created. It wasn't--not by Dovecot, not by Postfix. I had to
manually create a new one, put one ch
The first place I went to for test advice and planning recommendations
was http://wiki2.dovecot.org/TestInstallation - The very first test
failed. Doc says:
Next check that Dovecot is listening for connections:
# telnet localhost 143
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character i
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:12:38 +0300, you wrote:
>By the way, I looked at my own file, and it doesn't give full path of lmtp.
Yes, that confused me as well. I just copied it directly from the wiki
which I cited. Interesting. I have removed that bit and corrected
another error--an extra right-brace-
I still haven't gotten any make commands to work, but I did
successfully rename the four directories to something else I could
easily find, and the new version does attempt to start.
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:29:00 +0200, you wrote:
>Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 09:15 -0400 schrieb Steve
After applying some changes to 10-master.conf as detailed at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP I receive the
following when trying to start:
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file
/etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-master.conf
line 49: Expecting '{'
I'm trying to enable LMTP. The instru
o make
target `distclean'. Stop.
>On 12 June 2015 at 15:13, Muzaffer Tolga Ozses wrote:
>
>> Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things
>> dovecot.
>>
>> On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura wrote:
>>
>>> On advice/rec
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:13:18 +0300, you wrote:
>Have you done *make distclean* in prior? That should remove all things
>dovecot.
No, because I didn't know about that one. I'll do that forthwith, and
thanks.
>On 12 June 2015 at 15:10, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
>> On ad
On advice/recommendation received on this list, I removed version
1.0.15 with:
rm -rf /usr/local/dovecot
However, now that I have version 2 properly installed, configured, and
ready to start testing with Postfix, it appears the old version is
still in /usr/local/sbin, /usr/local/include, /usr/loc
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 22:27:43 -0500, you wrote:
>
>On Jun 11, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:14:31 -0400, Ajai Khattri
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Im using Dovecot for LMTP for all my mail users, since this way they are
>>>
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:14:31 -0400, Ajai Khattri
wrote:
>Im using Dovecot for LMTP for all my mail users, since this way they are
>completely virtual (i.e. dont need to have a local account at all), all
>mail gets delivered to Maildirs owned by dovecot. Also LMTP makes it easier
>to insert script
My system has a great big four users. The Dovecot wiki says LMTP is
more efficient, and someone on IRC told me I'd need it if I were ever
to use sieve, which at this time I have no intention of doing. Should
I stick with LDA, or just implement LMTP so I'm ready if ever I need
it in the future? The
passwd solved.
Since I've decided to go to version 2, which is a lot more difficult
to set up because I have to look in a lot more places than I did with
version 1.0.15, what do I do with the old dovecot/passwd or its
contents? I see no references to it in any of the stuff in conf.d or
doc/dovecot/wiki.
As alway
Mark:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:38:11 +0200, you wrote:
>On 2015-06-10 12:22:45 -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> When starting Dovecot 1.0.15 after building it from source using the
>> standard procedure, I receive the following message when starting,
>> even though SLL_DISABLE=
When starting Dovecot 1.0.15 after building it from source using the
standard procedure, I receive the following message when starting,
even though SLL_DISABLE=No:
Error: SSL support not compiled in but ssl_disable=no
Fatal: Invalid configuration in /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
How is SSL support
I hope I'm asking this on the right list, in the right place. I go
through this every three years and for whatever reason keep forgetting
to record how this works!
In the Dovecot config, there are two places to define SSL
certificates--ssl_cert_file and ssl_key_file. My question is this:
Which two
e to change subscriptions from
any device... I just want independent subscriptions for my
tablet/phone/desktop/VM clients - as I use email in different ways from
these different environments.
On 04/06/2015 15:24, Daniel Tröder wrote:
Hi Steve,
I don't think the IMAP protocol has the conc
I have a working Dovecot IMAP server (v. 2.2.9) where I have a single
user but a lot of folders (over 800 in total, hierarchically arranged,
about 50 of which are in active use.)
I have multiple clients (including k9Mail on Android and Thunderbird on
Linux and Windows). These clients all prese
On Mon, 25 May 2015 15:50:08 +
Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 05/25/2015 03:44 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > Hey guys, please tell me that Dovecot does not depend on systemd!
> >
>
> Nope, Dovecot doesn't depend on systemd. Why should it depend on
> systemd?
I could as
S=-p'
> #LimitCORE=8192
> LimitCORE=infinity
Hey guys, please tell me that Dovecot does not depend on systemd!
SteveT
Steve Litt
May 2015 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
http://www.troubleshooters.com/startbiz
On Thu, 21 May 2015 19:21:41 -0500, you wrote:
>
>On May 21, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
>> I needed to receive a message to ad...@mydomain.com. I waited and
>> waited for it, but it never showed up in the admin mailbox on the
>> mydomain.com machine
I needed to receive a message to ad...@mydomain.com. I waited and
waited for it, but it never showed up in the admin mailbox on the
mydomain.com machine. So I looked for the admin account in
/etc/dovecot.passwd, and there it was, plain-text password and all! I
set up a retrieval system for the admi
I have charge of a very mixed system--current OS (Fedora 20--OK 21's
out but I just haven't upgraded yet), current (or nearly so) Mailman
(2.1.18-1), Postfix 2.10 with a configuration file sfrom something a
lot older which I've run through the upgrade-configuration procedure,
and old Dovecot (1.0.1
I'm wrestling with transitioning from a 1.0.15 system to a 2.2.25
system. The old dovecot.conf cannot be dropped into position on the
new system because so many config options and symbols have changed. It
seems every time I change something to match the new formats, I break
something else! Anyone o
es, even when crossposts are
involved. I use the very versatile procmail for filtering; I'm not sure
the OP's MS Outlook can do that. But, of course, Outlook has much more
serious issues than any of this: I'd recommend the OP use a different
mail client, for the security of his computer.
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
's have packages for Dovecot, or do I need to compile
it myself?
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
en odd stuff happens.
HTH,
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
so...
A few days ago I deleted my whole INBOX and rsync'ed it back in a
matter of minutes.
Here's some info on my backup system:
http://troubleshooters.com/lpm/200609/200609.htm
If anyone's interested in backing up to Blu-Ray, here's some info I
wrote:
http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/blu-ray-backup.htm
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
n email client) work perfectly.
WORKAROUND
To "solve" this problem, do the following raindance as root:
ifdown lo
ifup lo
After the raindance, local access to Dovecot works perfectly, and all
nmap commands perform as expected.
LOL, hey man, don't shoot me, I'm just the mes
I'm still not seeing emails from the list. With help from others, I
thought I had the IPs cleared since the change back in February, but
apparently not.
Can someone PM me and let me know what outgoing IP addresses the list is
using please?
steve campbell
On 3/6/2014 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.03.2014 21:37, schrieb Eugene R:
Got access denied for direct mail:
: host mailserver2.cnpapers.net[216.12.119.162] said:
550 5.7.1 Access denied (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
Well, this is now really off-topic for the list (local config er
uot;, but it sounds
like email was either bounced back to the list or my server is in some
type of outgoing list to prevent sending to me.
I'm at a loss. Is there any way an admin can check for me, please, to
see if there's a problem they might spot?
Thanks,
steve
Is the list down or have I been blocked.
101 - 200 of 359 matches
Mail list logo
