On 2022-09-25 14:35, Christian Kivalo wrote:
On September 25, 2022 1:27:23 PM GMT+02:00, Marc
wrote:
I think this page[1] is not correct
If you configure this option:
imapsieve_mailbox1_before =
file:/usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
the file report-spam.svbin cannot be created bec
On September 25, 2022 1:27:23 PM GMT+02:00, Marc wrote:
>
>I think this page[1] is not correct
>
>If you configure this option:
>
>imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
>
>the file report-spam.svbin cannot be created because users cannot write there.
You hav
I think this page[1] is not correct
If you configure this option:
imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
the file report-spam.svbin cannot be created because users cannot write there.
[1]
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_si
Den 17.01.2021 02:15, skrev Toni Mueller:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:01:21PM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote:
You don't need antispam plugin:
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/
I also don't see any docs about the plugin on the wiki.
Does it mean
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:01:21PM +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> You don't need antispam plugin:
>
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/
I also don't see any docs about the plugin on the wiki.
Does it mean that this plugin is deprecated?
Thanks,
Toni
Hello
I have a problem with migrating dovecot from 2.2.36 to 2.3.8 -
everything works fine, but a problem with migrating anti-spam plugins
New dovecot 2.3.x has implemented own antispam-plugin like:
new from dovecot 2.3.8 -
# From elsewhere to Spam folder
imapsieve_mailbox1_name
>
> I need "Antispam plugin". What antispam-plugin I must use ?
>
> In older version dovecot-2.2.36.4 i use "dovecot-antispam-plugin" but in
> centos I had a problem with configure - probably toold wersion
>
> "./configure: line 3193: DC_DOVECOT: co
Hi
System centos8 + dovecot-2.3.8 from repo
# 2.3.8 (9df20d2db): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.8 (b7b03ba2)
# OS: Linux 4.18.0-193.19.1.el8_2.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release
8.2.2004 (Core)
I need "Antispam plugin". What antispam-plugin I must use ?
In old
Thank you for this. I have a DSPAM setup that did work with the
suggested scrips, but I used the old dovecot antispam plugin and enjoyed
the signature method. I am going to try this out next week to see if it
works for me. If it does, I will love this.
Thanks again.
Trever
On 02/24/2018 02:02 PM
Dovecot
2.2.33.2 with PigeonHole 4.21, it runs DSpam 3.10.2 to scan and tag all
incoming mails as Spam or not then a Sieve rule to put the Spam emails
into the Spam folder, I was also using the DSpam Antispam plugin to
enable moving messages from one folder to another to teach failures to
DSpam
Op 31-10-2017 om 15:33 schreef j.emerlik:
Hi,
my dovecot is configured with IMAP Sieve antispam plugin (sa-learn),
everything seems to be working correctly but in debug mode in my log file I
noticed "dovecot: imap: Error".
Last 14 lines od my log file:
Oct 31 15:05:25 mnode1 dov
Hi,
my dovecot is configured with IMAP Sieve antispam plugin (sa-learn),
everything seems to be working correctly but in debug mode in my log file I
noticed "dovecot: imap: Error".
Last 14 lines od my log file:
Oct 31 15:05:25 mnode1 dovecot: imap: Error: Oct 31 15:05:25.040 [10743]
On Wed Mar 01 2017 03:11:48 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi
wrote:
>> But, if the imapsieve is only matching to literal foldernames, should
>> I just duplicate the trigger lines for each type of junk folder or is
>> there a method to have the sieve script enumerate all the options
>> l
is
> there a method to have the sieve script enumerate all the options
> listed by 'special use' or is there a better method for this? I want
> to put the spam-mail-filing script as a global sieve script as all
> users will need it, rather than duplicating out for each user
ed it, rather than duplicating out for each user.
Many thanks ,
Andy R
On 10/02/2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Hi!
Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome.
https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
---
Aki Tuomi
Dovecot oy
e the successfully processed messages.
Sieve doesn't look like it can handle asynchronous processing, but I'd
certainly be interested if I'm missing something there. One less thing
to configure and maintain!
Jeff
On 2/12/17 5:52 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On February 10, 2017
;
For DSPAM, with --client, one also needs a --user set.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-antispam-plugin/file/5ebc6aae4d7c/src/dspam.c
did this.
Is there a way to feed this into the scripts mentioned? I imagine this
is imap.user or imap.email, but how would one pass it to the script?
Thank you.
Den 12. feb. 2017 23:56, skrev Marcus Rueckert:
> On 2017-02-12 23:00:49 +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
>> Just follow the wiki and replace sa-learn scripts with calling dspam.
>> Dspam direct pipe needs mail-line-endings (\r\n) translated into unix
>> line-endings (\r).
I had a typo here, (\r\n)
Op 2/12/2017 om 11:00 PM schreef Håkon Alstadheim:
>
> Den 12. feb. 2017 21:44, skrev ebr...@whitehorsetc.com:
>>
>> Any opinion on dspam's interoperability with this?
>>
>>
> Just follow the wiki and replace sa-learn scripts with calling dspam.
> Dspam direct pipe needs mail-line-endings (\r\n) tr
On 2017-02-12 23:00:49 +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Just follow the wiki and replace sa-learn scripts with calling dspam.
> Dspam direct pipe needs mail-line-endings (\r\n) translated into unix
> line-endings (\r).
tbh ... what do you do about mails which just use \r as separator?
s|\r\n|\n|
Den 12. feb. 2017 21:44, skrev ebr...@whitehorsetc.com:
>
>
> Any opinion on dspam's interoperability with this?
>
>
Just follow the wiki and replace sa-learn scripts with calling dspam.
Dspam direct pipe needs mail-line-endings (\r\n) translated into unix
line-endings (\r).
like so:
-
Den 12. feb. 2017 15:12, skrev Ralph Seichter:
> On 12.02.2017 13:25, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>> The "imap.mailbox" environment is the empty string in this case. Why?
>> Well, the Sieve interpreter does not know about it, since the
>> "imapsieve" extension is not activated in the require line.
>
Any opinion on dspam's interoperability with this?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:07 AM -0700, "Aki Tuomi" wrote:
Hi!
Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
IMAPSieve. Comments
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 2/12/2017 om 5:36 PM schreef George Kontostanos:
>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>
>>>> On February 10, 2017 at 10:06 AM Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
On 12.02.17 19:05, George Kontostanos wrote:
> Actually I think that sa-learn is invoked as user vmail. But of course
> I might be wrong.
It might depend on system configuration. On my servers, Sieve scripts are
definitely executed as the OS user that matches the current IMAP user.
> Do you have
Op 2/12/2017 om 5:36 PM schreef George Kontostanos:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>>> On February 10, 2017 at 10:06 AM Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 12.02.2017 17:36, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
>> it automatically creates a .spamassassin/ folder in the user
>
> That happens because sa-learn is invoked as the user who is logged into
> IMAP. If you want all users to contribute to a glo
On 12.02.2017 17:36, George Kontostanos wrote:
> it automatically creates a .spamassassin/ folder in the user
That happens because sa-learn is invoked as the user who is logged into
IMAP. If you want all users to contribute to a global SpamAssassin
database (like I do), you'll need to create your
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > On February 10, 2017 at 10:06 AM Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> > Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
> > not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to repl
On 12.02.2017 13:25, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> The "imap.mailbox" environment is the empty string in this case. Why?
> Well, the Sieve interpreter does not know about it, since the
> "imapsieve" extension is not activated in the require line.
Now there's a facepalm moment. ;-) Thank you, with a modi
> On February 10, 2017 at 10:06 AM Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
> not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
> IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome.
>
> htt
Op 2/10/2017 om 10:15 PM schreef George Kontostanos:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ralph Seichter
> wrote:
>
>
> Same problem here. As a workaround I tried the following:
>
> # From Spam folder to Inbox
> imapsieve_mailbox2_name = Inbox
> imapsieve_mailbox2_from = Spam
> imapsieve_mailb
Op 2/10/2017 om 8:59 PM schreef Ralph Seichter:
> On 10.02.17 20:34, Michael Slusarz wrote:
>
>> When you move a message to a new mailbox, that is a "new message"
>> event (a new UID in the target mailbox is created; the message count
>> increases). So imap.mailbox is set to the name of the *target
I'm bumping this because it still occurs with dovecot 2.2.22.
my dovecot-antispam plugin configuration :
antispam_allow_append_to_spam = no
antispam_backend = pipe
antispam_pipe_program = /usr/bin/rspamc
antispam_pipe_program_args = -h;127.0.0.
Op 2/10/2017 om 8:46 PM schreef David Mehler:
> Hello,
>
> Chiming in on this with a question, and will be getting to it over the
> weekend or later this evening time permitting.
>
> Does retraining a message as either spam or ham alter message headers
> for example x-spam or the spamassassin-modif
> On February 12, 2017 at 1:32 PM Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Op 2/10/2017 om 2:20 PM schreef Alessio Cecchi:
> > Il 10/02/2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
> >> Hi!
> >> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
> >> n
Op 2/10/2017 om 2:20 PM schreef Alessio Cecchi:
> Il 10/02/2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
>> Hi!
>> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
>> not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
>> IMAPSieve. Comments and s
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Ralph Seichter
wrote:
> On 10.02.17 20:34, Michael Slusarz wrote:
>
> > When you move a message to a new mailbox, that is a "new message"
> > event (a new UID in the target mailbox is created; the message count
> > increases). So imap.mailbox is set to the name of
On 10.02.17 20:34, Michael Slusarz wrote:
> When you move a message to a new mailbox, that is a "new message"
> event (a new UID in the target mailbox is created; the message count
> increases). So imap.mailbox is set to the name of the *target* mailbox.
My tests seem to indicate otherwise. Delet
Hello,
Chiming in on this with a question, and will be getting to it over the
weekend or later this evening time permitting.
Does retraining a message as either spam or ham alter message headers
for example x-spam or the spamassassin-modified subject header?
If not is it possible to do so after
> On February 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> On 10.02.17 18:34, Michael Slusarz wrote:
> > > Can we add an exception for the Trash folder?
> > This is handled in the sieve script. E.g.:
> >
> > require "environment";
> > if environment "imap.mailbox" "Trash" {
> > stop;
> > }
>
On 10.02.17 18:34, Michael Slusarz wrote:
> > Can we add an exception for the Trash folder?
>
> This is handled in the sieve script. E.g.:
>
> require "environment";
> if environment "imap.mailbox" "Trash" {
> stop;
> }
This does not work for me, and I don't really expect it to work either.
htt
On 10.02.17 18:22, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
> My concern is, will you experience any lag while moving message?
I don't use direct calls to sa-learn, but store the piped e-mails on
disk, and a periodic cron-job picks them up and invokes sa-learn. This
way, there is no noticeable lag.
-Ralph
> On February 10, 2017 at 9:25 AM George Kontostanos
> wrote:
[snip]
> I think that this needs some change:
>
> # From Spam folder to elsewhere
> imapsieve_mailbox2_name = *
> imapsieve_mailbox2_from = Spam
> imapsieve_mailbox2_causes = COPY
> imapsieve_mailbox2_before = file:/usr/lib
> On Feb 11, 2017, at 12:50 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> Check out https://wiki.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/IMAPSieve,
My concern is, will you experience any lag while moving message?
According to the doc, this plugin works like “pipe” backend of old “antispam”
plugin,
On 10.02.2017 16:09, Darac Marjal wrote:
> Check out https://wiki.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Plugins/IMAPSieve,
> which explains that sieve is normally only used at delivery time, but
> the sieve_imapsieve plugin runs a *different* sieve script based on
> IMAP actions (for example, COPY).
Thank
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:25 PM, George Kontostanos
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Darac Marjal
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:52:52PM +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>>
>>> On 10.02.2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>>
>>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Darac Marjal
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:52:52PM +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
>> On 10.02.2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>
>> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
>>> not to use it, we wro
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 03:52:52PM +0100, Ralph Seichter wrote:
On 10.02.2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with IMAPSieve.
In my setup, I use the following sieve script
On 10.02.2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
> not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with IMAPSieve.
In my setup, I use the following sieve script globally for all users:
if header :is "X-Spam
Il 10/02/2017 09:06, Aki Tuomi ha scritto:
Hi!
Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome.
https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
Hi
Aki Tuomi wrote on 10.02.2017 15:06:
Hi!
Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome.
https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
---
Aki Tuomi
Nice. Finally got around to switching. Had to add filter to my dspam
pipe (another one I'm overdue for replacing) . Antispam plugin seems to
have automatically converted line endings from "mail-type" '\r\n' into
linux plain '\n' .
Like so:
sed -e 's/\r$/
On 10.02.2017 10:35, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
> On 10-02-17 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> Hi!
>> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
>> not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
>> IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions
On 10-02-17 09:06, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Hi!
> Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
> not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
> IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome.
>
> https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo
Hi!
Since antispam plugin is deprecated and we would really prefer people
not to use it, we wrote instructions on how to replace it with
IMAPSieve. Comments and suggestions are most welcome.
https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/AntispamWithSieve
---
Aki Tuomi
Dovecot oy
> the behavior in 2.2.24, though I'm not sure if it was in .25 or .26.
> I haven't tracked down the details further.
>
> Anyway, the antispam plugin uses this API to find the X-DSPAM-Signature
> header, and the change causes the plugin to abort. This happens in the
> pl
s wasn't
> the behavior in 2.2.24, though I'm not sure if it was in .25 or .26.
> I haven't tracked down the details further.
>
> Anyway, the antispam plugin uses this API to find the X-DSPAM-Signature
> header, and the change causes the plugin to abort. This happens in the
&
antispam: mail copy: src spam: 0, dst spam: 1,
src unsure: 0
There are no log entries about how dspam is called, or what goes on. Indeed,
dspam doesn't get called at all. I know, because I've examined the antispam-
plugin source code. There would be a log message if dspam was called.
Am Mittwoch, 30. November 2016, 16:23:13 CET schrieb Volker Wysk:
> Do you know any documentation about the Dovecot
> plugin API? I couldn't find any.
I've found it. No need to tell me.
Volker
the past and contributed a few small
> fixes, but nothing more. Also, it doesn't look like it is actively
> maintained at the moment.
So, if I would debug the antispam plugin, adding more log messages, finding the
reason it doesn't work now, would my changes be included in the antispa
Op 28-11-2016 om 21:28 schreef Volker Wysk:
Hi!
"Dovecot always logs a detailed error message if something goes wrong.
If it doesn't, it's considered a bug and will be fixed." (http://
wiki2.dovecot.org/Logging)
Yes, that is indeed what Dovecot and Pigeonhole do. However, AntiSpam is
not pa
One more point:
The spam message, which has been moved to the Spam folder for training dspam,
doesn't get moved. When I refresh (in KMail), the message reappears in INBOX.
Bye
V.W.
1,
src unsure: 0
There are no log entries about how dspam is called, or what goes on. Indeed,
dspam doesn't get called at all. I know, because I've examined the antispam-
plugin source code. There would be a log message if dspam was called.
It's hard to study the source code, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear list,
I made a patch which extends dovecot-antispam-plugin with support to take the
addition and removal of a specific set of flags as trigger for learning.
This allows for very tight integration with Thunderbird and KMail, which both
set
Hi,
I've configured the antispam plugin like in the wiki to use the sa-
learn-pipe.sh shell script.
But it's not creating the log file in /tmp.
Even if I add a "touch /tmp/x" in sa-learn-pipe.sh it's not created.
So how I can check if it works correctly?
dovecot version
Restarting dovecot (via systemctl): dovecot.service.
>> root@vsrv78105:/etc/dovecot# tail -f /var/log/syslog | grep imap
>> Nov 3 20:02:45 vsrv78105 dovecot: imap-login: Warning: Killed with
>> signal 15 (by pid=1 uid=0 code=kill)
>> Nov 3 20:02:48 vsrv78105 dovecot: ma
3 20:03:03 vsrv78105 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
> method=PLAIN, rip=xxx, lip=xxx, mpid=14954, TLS, session=
> Nov 3 20:03:03 vsrv78105 imap: antispam: plugin initialising (2.0-notgit)
> Nov 3 20:03:03 vsrv78105 imap: antispam: verbose debug enabled
> Nov 3 20:03:03 vsrv78105
3 vsrv78105 imap: antispam: mail copy: src spam: 0, dst
spam: 0, src unsure: 0
Nov 3 20:03:14 vsrv78105 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=xxx, lip=xxx, mpid=14959, TLS, session=
Nov 3 20:03:14 vsrv78105 imap: antispam: plugin initialising (2.0-notgit)
Nov 3 20:03:14 vsrv78105 ima
Hi,
Has this slipped off the radar or is it somehow not suitable for inclusion?
Thanks,
Robert
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Robert Munteanu
wrote:
> (snip)
>
>> I have no issue in resending a new version of the patch with better
>> error reporting, will do so in the following days.
>>
>> R
Robert,
First, thanks!
Second, I'm not a committer on the dovecot project. But I've written a lot of
software where if an end user has a problem and either they want to know why or
if they report it and ask for help, I've found it is MUCH better to have enough
info in the message given to the
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:17 AM, b...@indietorrent.org wrote:
>
>> On 2016-08-18 22:58, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
>>> On 16-08-18 22:43:32, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>> On 8/18/2016 10:26 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > (Full "doveconf -n" output is at the end of this
On 2016-08-18 22:58, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On 16-08-18 22:43:32, Ben Johnson wrote:
On 8/18/2016 10:26 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (Full "doveconf -n" output is at the end of this message.)
>
> I'm attempting to recreate a "recipe" I had used successfully for quite
> some time (in Ubunt
On 16-08-18 22:43:32, Ben Johnson wrote:
> On 8/18/2016 10:26 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > (Full "doveconf -n" output is at the end of this message.)
> >
> > I'm attempting to recreate a "recipe" I had used successfully for quite
> > some time (in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS), which allowed me
On 8/18/2016 10:26 PM, Ben Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (Full "doveconf -n" output is at the end of this message.)
>
> I'm attempting to recreate a "recipe" I had used successfully for quite
> some time (in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS), which allowed me to train
> SpamAssassin's Bayes database when someone d
Hello,
(Full "doveconf -n" output is at the end of this message.)
I'm attempting to recreate a "recipe" I had used successfully for quite
some time (in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS), which allowed me to train
SpamAssassin's Bayes database when someone dragged an email message from
one sub-folder of the accou
(snip)
> I have no issue in resending a new version of the patch with better
> error reporting, will do so in the following days.
>
> Robert
I've attached a second version of the patch, feel free to consider any
of them for inclusion.
Thanks,
Robert
--
http://robert.muntea.nu/
changeset: 5
Hi Harlan,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> On 8/16/16 1:24 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hopefully this is the right channel for such a patch. I have a minor
>> enhancement to submit for the antispam plugin
>>
>> http:/
On 17.08.2016 02:18, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> On 8/16/16 1:24 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Hopefully this is the right channel for such a patch. I have a minor
>> enhancement to submit for the antispam plugin
>>
>> http://hg.dovecot.org/doveco
On 8/16/16 1:24 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully this is the right channel for such a patch. I have a minor
> enhancement to submit for the antispam plugin
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-antispam-plugin
>
> It adds minimal error checking for the sendma
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right channel for such a patch. I have a minor
enhancement to submit for the antispam plugin
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-antispam-plugin
It adds minimal error checking for the sendmail_binary, otherwise the
reported error in case of a missing binary or one with
Hello,
I struggled a bit with getting the antispam plugin to work, because the
plugin configuration in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Antispam is
incomplete. After some twiddling, I ended up with this:
# /etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-plugin.conf
plugin {
antispam_backend = mailtrain
Hello,
I'm bumping this because it still occurs with dovecot 2.2.22.
my dovecot-antispam plugin configuration :
antispam_allow_append_to_spam = no
antispam_backend = pipe
antispam_pipe_program = /usr/bin/rspamc
antispam_pipe_program_args = -h;127.0.0.1:113
chmod 660 /var/log/sa-learn-pipe.log
cat > /etc/logrotate.d/sa-learn-pipe.log << EOFLOG
/var/log/sa-learn-pipe.log {
daily
missingok
rotate 10
compress
delaycompress
notifempty
create 660 ${VMAIL_ID} dovecot
}
EOFLOG
fi # spamassassin
###
> Am 13.04.2016 um 12:14 schrieb Johannes Rohr :
>
> Yikes! Our server is running a fairly dated Ubuntu Precise, what's your
> version? Did an upgrade fail to fix it? I am not seeing this error on Debian
> Sid but I am not using virtual users over here, so that might be the cause.
> Did you re
Am 13.04.2016 um 11:54 schrieb Florian Mutter:
Am 13.04.2016 um 10:35 schrieb Johannes Rohr :
tweaked the wrapper script to make it work. It seems like the sa-learn call
silently fails:
"/usr/local/bin/sa-learn-pipe.sh" 10L, 350C geschrieben
root@vm10:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# cat /tmp/sa-learn-pip
Am 13.04.2016 um 11:54 schrieb Florian Mutter:
Am 13.04.2016 um 10:35 schrieb Johannes Rohr :
tweaked the wrapper script to make it work. It seems like the sa-learn call
silently fails:
"/usr/local/bin/sa-learn-pipe.sh" 10L, 350C geschrieben
root@vm10:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# cat /tmp/sa-learn-pip
t go away by upgrading
Cheers,
Johannes
Cheers,
Johannes
Am 13.04.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Johannes Rohr:
Am 13.04.2016 um 09:17 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 13-04-16 08:27, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hi List,
does the antispam plugin any way of actually seeing how it is
calling the pipe program an
Am 13.04.2016 um 10:35 schrieb Johannes Rohr :
>
> tweaked the wrapper script to make it work. It seems like the sa-learn call
> silently fails:
>
> "/usr/local/bin/sa-learn-pipe.sh" 10L, 350C geschrieben
> root@vm10:/etc/dovecot/conf.d# cat /tmp/sa-learn-pipe.log
> starting log
> 25200-start (-
nes Rohr wrote:
Hi List,
does the antispam plugin any way of actually seeing how it is
calling the pipe program and how it is failing? I can't reproduce the
failure when I call sa-learn manually. Can someone tell me, with
which UID the call happens, is it the UID the current dovecot process
09:45 schrieb Johannes Rohr:
Am 13.04.2016 um 09:17 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 13-04-16 08:27, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hi List,
does the antispam plugin any way of actually seeing how it is
calling the pipe program and how it is failing? I can't reproduce the
failure when I call sa-learn manually.
Am 13.04.2016 um 09:17 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 13-04-16 08:27, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hi List,
does the antispam plugin any way of actually seeing how it is
calling the pipe program and how it is failing? I can't reproduce the
failure when I call sa-learn manually. Can someone tell me,
On 13-04-16 08:27, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> does the antispam plugin any way of actually seeing how it is
> calling the pipe program and how it is failing? I can't reproduce the
> failure when I call sa-learn manually. Can someone tell me, with
> which UID the
Hi List,
does the antispam plugin any way of actually seeing how it is calling
the pipe program and how it is failing? I can't reproduce the failure
when I call sa-learn manually. Can someone tell me, with which UID the
call happens, is it the UID the current dovecot process is running
Hi Tom,
Am 12.04.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
On 12-04-16 20:14, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Hi, my setup is a dovecot 2.0.19 IMAP server on Ubuntu Precise with
the antispam plugin in version 2.0+20120225-2 and spamassassin at
version 3.2.2
I have been trying and failed to get the pipe
On 12-04-16 20:14, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Hi, my setup is a dovecot 2.0.19 IMAP server on Ubuntu Precise with
> the antispam plugin in version 2.0+20120225-2 and spamassassin at
> version 3.2.2
>
> I have been trying and failed to get the pipe backend of the antispam
&
assed to it via
stdout?
This is what I find in the syslog: Apr 12 21:54:32 vm10 imap: antispam:
plugin initialising (2.0-notgit)
Apr 12 21:54:32 vm10 imap: antispam: verbose debug enabled
Apr 12 21:54:32 vm10 imap: antispam: "SPAM" is exact match spam folder
Apr 12 21:54:32 vm10 imap:
> antispam_mail_spam = --spam
> antispam_mail_notspam = --ham
> }
>
> to dovecot.conf
>
> Cheers
>
> Jürgen
>
> Am 12.04.2016 um 20:14 schrieb Johannes Rohr:
>> Hi, my setup is a dovecot 2.0.19 IMAP server on Ubuntu Precise with
>> the antispam
Hi, my setup is a dovecot 2.0.19 IMAP server on Ubuntu Precise with
the antispam plugin in version 2.0+20120225-2 and spamassassin at
version 3.2.2
I have been trying and failed to get the pipe backend of the antispam
plugin to work. Spamassin by itself works, a manual call of sa-learn
:14 schrieb Johannes Rohr:
> Hi, my setup is a dovecot 2.0.19 IMAP server on Ubuntu Precise with
> the antispam plugin in version 2.0+20120225-2 and spamassassin at
> version 3.2.2
>
> I have been trying and failed to get the pipe backend of the antispam
> plugin to work. S
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
