Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-15 Thread Dag Nygren
On Wednesday 16 August 2017 07:34:25 Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Matt Bryant wrote: > > > hmm if message cannot be written to disk surely it remains on mda queue > > as not delviered and does not just disappear ? or am i reading this > > wrong ?! > > as Matt writes your MDA (aka

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-15 Thread Dag Nygren
On Wednesday 16 August 2017 07:56:13 Matt Bryant wrote: > hmm if message cannot be written to disk surely it remains on mda queue > as not delviered and does not just disappear ? or am i reading this > wrong ?! That would be nice. ... I have the delivery chain postfix -> lda-dovecot and when post

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-15 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Matt Bryant wrote: hmm if message cannot be written to disk surely it remains on mda queue as not delviered and does not just disappear ? or am i reading this wrong ?! as Matt writes your MDA (aka dovecot-lda) returns with an

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-15 Thread Matt Bryant
hmm if message cannot be written to disk surely it remains on mda queue as not delviered and does not just disappear ? or am i reading this wrong ?! > Dag Nygren > 16 August 2017 at 7:14 am > Thanks for all the advice on how to configure systemd > not to loose my emails a

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-15 Thread Dag Nygren
Thanks for all the advice on how to configure systemd not to loose my emails after every update. Much appreciated. But there could be other reasons for the mailboxes not being writable and what I am really asking for is for dovecot-lda not to loose the incoming emails into thin air in these cases

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-14 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 14 août 2017 09:24 +0300, Dag Nygren  : > Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for > some time and am struggling with systemd > at every update. > Fedora insists on setting > ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.service and postfix.service > at every update of the packages. > > This makes

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-14 Thread Sander Lepik
14.08.2017 10:57 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > On Monday 14 August 2017 10:22:54 Sander Lepik wrote: >> 14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > >>> PS! I really hate systemd - Destroys the UNIX way of >>> doing things with a heavy axe >> >> Don't hate it, better learn to use it: >> https://wiki.archl

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-14 Thread Dag Nygren
On Monday 14 August 2017 10:22:54 Sander Lepik wrote: > 14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > > PS! I really hate systemd - Destroys the UNIX way of > > doing things with a heavy axe > > Don't hate it, better learn to use it: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/systemd#Drop-in_files Can

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-14 Thread Dag Nygren
On Monday 14 August 2017 10:22:54 Sander Lepik wrote: > 14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > > > > Hi! > > > > Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for > > some time and am struggling with systemd > > at every update. > > Fedora insists on setting > > ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.

Re: Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-14 Thread Sander Lepik
14.08.2017 09:24 Dag Nygren kirjutas: > > Hi! > > Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for > some time and am struggling with systemd > at every update. > Fedora insists on setting > ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.service and postfix.service > at every update of the packages. > > This

Failback mailboxes?

2017-08-13 Thread Dag Nygren
Hi! Have been using Fedora as my dovecot server for some time and am struggling with systemd at every update. Fedora insists on setting ProtectSystem=full in both dovecot.service and postfix.service at every update of the packages. This makes my mailstore which is in /usr/local/var/mail Read-onl