Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-12 Thread Nagy, Attila
On 02/11/16 03:50, David Niklas wrote: On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-10 Thread David Niklas
On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: > Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP > implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. > I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, > compatible protocol frontend with an open backend A

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-09 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Timo Sirainen : On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
> On 08 Feb 2016, at 13:28, Nagy, Attila wrote: > > On 02/08/16 12:07, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila wrote: >>> On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other random servers, and have

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2016-02-08 12:31:57 +0100, Nagy, Attila wrote: > On 02/08/16 11:44, Marcus Rueckert wrote: > >that sounds like s3 API based backend. > > > >also note that dovecot comes with some "non local mail storage plugins" > >in the commercial part: > > > >``` > >In this release, we support Windows Azure,

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Nagy, Attila
On 02/08/16 11:44, Marcus Rueckert wrote: that sounds like s3 API based backend. also note that dovecot comes with some "non local mail storage plugins" in the commercial part: ``` In this release, we support Windows Azure, Amazon S3, Scality and Dropbox systems. ``` so that should come close

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Nagy, Attila
On 02/08/16 12:07, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila wrote: On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other random servers, and have Dovecot act as kind of a middleware and translate the requests. May

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 08 Feb 2016, at 12:56, Nagy, Attila wrote: > > On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> Oh, you were thinking about ability to provide IMAP/etc support for other >> random servers, and have Dovecot act as kind of a middleware and translate >> the requests. Maybe the answer is still jmap th

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Nagy, Attila
On 02/08/16 11:16, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or librar

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Marcus Rueckert
that sounds like s3 API based backend. also note that dovecot comes with some "non local mail storage plugins" in the commercial part: ``` In this release, we support Windows Azure, Amazon S3, Scality and Dropbox systems. ``` so that should come close to what you want. for a local version you co

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
> On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP >> implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. >> I don't know any server or library which provides

Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: > > Hi, > > Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP > implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. > I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, > compatible protocol frontend with an op

RFC: HTTP based storage API

2016-02-08 Thread Nagy, Attila
Hi, Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be used to easily make a custom