"Bill Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
When we wanted to protect a connection outside like a PL-259 on an SO-239
connector, we would spray it with a product called Krylon, no not the paints
in
Mahlon Haunschild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
The Kenwood MC-50 is convertible lo-hi impedance; just have to
remove/reinstall the plug in the connector on the back of the microphone
appropriatel
Hello Bill,
I used an MC 50 mic with a TR 4C some time ago and the
results were fine. Be aware that the TR 4 requires a high Z mic and the MC
50 has 2 settings which are changed on the connector ring at the base of
the microphone. The labels are tough to see but they read simply, high or
Shure mic that was so popular: the 444.Al Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Al Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>made an utterence to the drakelist gang--Hi Bill,The plug is OK, same as the switchcraft as far as dimensions, etc. areconce
Hi David and Drakelist,
I am new to the drakelist, having gotten serious about using a T-4XC/R-4C that I got several years ago. I just got the transmitter off the bench; it needed a lot of wafer switch cleaning and a good alignment.
In response to David's inquiry, when using the receiver or tra
"Al Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hi Bill,
The plug is OK, same as the switchcraft as far as dimensions, etc. are
concerned. The problem is the mic. If I'm correct, the KW MC50 is a l
billgoodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
I am trying to get my old TR4 back on the air. I seem to be putting out
a good rf as shown on my old Philmore SWR meter but am told that my audio
is extreme
"Richard Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Thanks for the correction.
I my haste really intended to state that the commission members were
appointed by the President, and confirmed by the Senate
"R. Ton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hi all. This is my first post to the list. I've been getting
back into ham radio after too many years away and just bought a
used TR-4C with AC-4 and MS-4.
"Matthew E. McNeely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
it seems to me that the amateur has been a second class service for a long
time with the FCC. I was first licensed in 1968 and was active until 19
Mahlon Haunschild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hello, list.
I've recently acquired a 2-B receiver sans calibrator, and am
considering making one similar to the 2-AC. I have the schematic and
eve
"Thom R. Lacosta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
For those that use digital modes or wonder about them, you might be interested
in this announcement,
Thom
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:36:15 -0500
From:
K4OAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
I have just completed a Service Part Locator for the Drake C Line.
Anyone who has ever tried to repair an R-4C or T-4XC has spent a lot of
time looking for a part
billgoodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
I am trying to get my old TR4 back on the air. I seem to be putting out
a good rf as shown on my old Philmore SWR meter but am told that my audio
is extreme
"Thom R. Lacosta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
For those that use digital modes or wonder about them, you might be interested
in this announcement,
Thom
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:36:15 -0500
From:
"Don Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
List,
The Drake B-Line that I advertised on 23 SEP 2004 has been sold.
Thanks to all for their interest.
Don
K0WWT
-
"Thom R. Lacosta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Mark Gilger wrote:
I think there used to be a 20 meter net some years ago. It would be
interesting to know why it disbanded? Was
17 matches
Mail list logo
