On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:56:42 -0500, Garey Barrell wrote:
>We discussed the 'Reply To' situation on this list some time ago. I at
>least found it interesting, since the 'authority' was "that was the the
>way it was done, from the 'beginning'".
What's missing from this equation was that, in th
Richard Knoppow wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Richard A. (Tony) Stalls"
Hello all...
I'm a newbie to the list and this is my first message to the group,
but I've corresponded to a few individuals privately, mostly because
I have the wisdom to know what I don't know. The f
- Original Message -
From: "Richard A. (Tony) Stalls"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] TR7 issue
Hello all...
I'm a newbie to the list and this is my first message to
the group, but I've corresponded to a few individual
- Original Message - From: "john"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] TR7 issue
Just to jump in here and reinforce what Garey mentioned...PLEASE
respond to the reflector and to the original poster if need
be. You can save the next guy with
- Original Message -
From: "john"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] TR7 issue
Just to jump in here and reinforce what Garey
mentioned...PLEASE respond to the reflector and to the
original poster if need be. You can save th
e, WA
-Original Message-
From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net]
On Behalf Of Don Cunningham
Sent: Monday, 13 December, 2010 12:34
To: k4...@mindspring.com
Cc: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] TR7 issue
I just started to reply that we might co
Yes Garey:
Any of the rigs with lots of connectors, card edges, and switch wafers
are an issue.
I never had done any cleaning on these switches at all since they looked
brand new. Even now, not a hint of the normal dark color on the
switches. But I could see the shiny rub mark on them so j
Welll...no it was not unlocked. I know what that looks like. and it
was /is 33MHz and 17MHz when fixed Rx is depressed.
This was stable, normally operating in all other senses but wrong frequency.
It must have been getting bad selection information out of the band
select switch because once
I just started to reply that we might consider changing the reply to reply
to, then realized what list I'm on. We've been there, done that one and it
"ain't gonna happen" here, so I withdraw my statement, hi.
We, as list users, are just gonna have to be careful on this list. Garey is
right,
Just to jump in here and reinforce what Garey mentioned...PLEASE respond to
the reflector and to the original poster if need be. You can save the next
guy with the same problem a LOT of time if you share your suggestions and
fixes with the reflector (and the reflector archives).
Don't be shy,
And here we are again with NOT A SINGLE RESPONSE OF "SEVERAL" BEING SENT
TO THE REFLECTOR!
If this is going to be a 'one-on-one' system, why bother? Makes the
archives a waste of time.
73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA
Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
Curt -
This just means that the 'low band' VCO is unlocked. The 'low band' VCO
covers 14 MHz and down. You should read about 17 MHz rather than 12,
which is probably why it's losing lock. If you switch to any of the
'high' bands (21 and up) and depress the FIXED - RCV button you should
see
Thanks to several immediate responses:
TR& is working again as it should.
After checking to be certain that the rig was actually running at 12MHz
(it was), I just did a very light application of Deoxit to the band
select switches. These were very clean...no hint of the common black
oxidati
GM All:
Hope you all are keeping warm. 10F here and all antennas iced up.
Have a problem that just started over the weekend with the TR7 here.
All works fine except when I try to select 14MHz. the display goes to
12 MHz.
If I start at 21 and step down with the 500K dwn button, it goes
14 matches
Mail list logo
