wouldnt
choose a Drake now anyways, but for casual rag chewing, get the B line and
save a few bucks.
73, Tim
K8WBL
From: "John_K7FD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: RE: [drakelist] R4B vs R4c
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:34:59 -0800
"John_K7FD" <[EMAIL PROTEC
"John_K7FD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Having had both lines, only the B line gave me a warm fuzzy feeling
inside... :) The C line never captured that certain feeling for me...
73 John K7FD
--
Glad that Garey is here to straighten me out. Guess I had the filter scheme backwards. Like I said, listen to the experts.
Eric
Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>made an utterence to the drakelist gang
The R-4B uses a crystal filter in the first IF and
passive filters in the 2nd IF
Gary
Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Both the B AND C lines have a "roofing filter" in the first IF. The
difference is in the second IF, where the B uses L-C filters in the
Passband Tuner
Hi Jim,
Years ago, my college radio club (Case Amateur Radio Club - W8EDU) had both a C-line and a B-line. The C-line was considered the better station. I presently have a C-line and recognize that the performance is much better than the B-line. One thing I know of is that the C uses a crystal f
I have owned Drake A-line, B-line and C-line equipment. I acquired a
Heath SB-300 while I owned the B-line and was shocked to find the Drake's
selectivity was noticeably inferior to the SB-300's selectivity. This was
due to Drake's use of an L/C network to achieve variably selectivity, whil
I would like to hear from those of you who have
used both. What are your opinions?
1) Electrical Performance Comparisons
2) Mechanical performance (PTO tuning
etc.)
Thanks,
Jim N4BPM
8 matches
Mail list logo
