+1 vote
Best regards
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: Yannis Milios
To: Roland Kammerer ; drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] drbdmanage-proxmox v2.0
Sure, I get your point. Hope to see you come to an agreement ag
I am agree.
In any environment (lab, production, critical, etc), if between PVE and
LINBIT not has a perfect coordination for publish the updates of packages
for that together works perfectly, simply all people will stop using DRBD.
Also, if the plugin(s) of LINBIT not add features as monitor
- Original Message -
From: "Dietmar Maurer"
To: "Jasmin J." ; "Cesar Peschiera" ;
"drbd-user"
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD8, dedicated repository for PVE 4
Even work well for the live migration of VM
antastic for me)
BR
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: "Dietmar Maurer"
To: "Jasmin J." ; "Cesar Peschiera" ;
"drbd-user"
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2016 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD8, dedicated repository for PVE 4
The functionalit
Hello Jasmin
Thanks for all your clarifications.
And let me to do a comments...
The only thing which is currently not supported is life migration. The
plugin checks if the other side is in secondary, otherwise it will not
activate the DRBD8 volume.
It might be possible to implement this (remove
Hi Jasmin
I guess there is no big difference between
PhysDisk / DRBD8 / LVM
or
PhysDisk / LVM / DRBD8
I read LVM is really simple implemented within the Kernel via a mapper and
doesn't add much execution time. And the additional LVM execution time is
the same for both variants.
As you tel
his method.
...
BR,
Jasmin
BR,
Cesar
*
On 12/22/2016 11:21 PM, Cesar Peschiera wrote:
Hello
I would like to know if is possible to have a repository of DRBD 8
version for
Proxmox VE, since that DRBD 9 isn't ready
Hi
Thanks for the answer... :-(
BR,
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: "Roland Kammerer"
To:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 5:28 AM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD8, dedicated repository for PVE 4
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 07:21:27PM -0300, Cesar Peschiera wrote:
Hello
Hello
I would like to know if is possible to have a repository of DRBD 8 version
for Proxmox VE, since that DRBD 9 isn't ready for use it in a production
environment.
Moreover, as i am using dedicated NICs for the replication of DRBD without a
Switch in the middle, each server have 2 NICs co
Hi to all
- I would like to know which is the more secure algorithm for the online
device verification?
- Also i would like to know if we have a tie in the first place (acording to
the first question), which is the more quick?
Best regards
Cesar
net {
data-integrity-alg crc32c; # crc32c, sha1, md5
}
This option only must be used for purposes of test, and never in a
production environment.
This directive commonly break the link of replication and produce into DRBD
a disconnection and, obviously, also a "OOS" (out of sync)
syncer
About of your problem of fence:
Instead of use a fence by Hardware, you can use a manual fence that come with
the cluster software.
Please read this:
1- It not require any hardware.
2- This option isn't advisable in production environments, but useful in
development environments.
3- The file us
the optimization of MySQL.
I hope these comments be helpful.
Best regards
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Fernández Pérez
To: Cesar Peschiera
Cc: Joel N. Burleson-Davis ; drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user
ecomended by IBM), and also use it with DRBD (in terms of
performance, if DRBD is installed in the Host and not in the guest, it will be
your best option).
Regards
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Fernández Pérez
To: Cesar Peschiera
Cc: Joel N. Burleson-Davis ;
al Message -----
From: Joel N. Burleson-Davis
To: Cesar Peschiera
Cc: Antonio Fernández Pérez ; drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD on virtual machine
I've run DRBD inside virtual guests as well as on a virtual host
But DRBD must be running in the host, not in the guest (VM).
---
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: Joel N. Burleson-Davis
To: Antonio Fernández Pérez
Cc: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD on virtual machine
Hi Richard
I am using PVE + DRBD (primary-primary, protocol C) + HA (rgmanager) without
problems since many years ago (With and without BBU in the RAID cards,
always with the recommended tuning by the DRBD web portal).
Now i am using:
- 2 NICs exclusive for DRBD in bonding-rr (NIC-to-NIC, som
1 lvm2 [20.00 GiB]
Total: 2 [219.50 GiB] / in use: 1 [199.50 GiB] / in no VG: 1 [20.00 GiB]
It is great see this, but i am not sure if my solution will be free of
problems, i would like to hear a second opinion.
Best regards
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: "Cesar Peschiera"
Hi to all
Anybody can help me?
- I have a problem with "drbd-utils 8.9.1" version, it was downloaded from
the git and compiled in my Debian Wheezy, the error messages are these:
root@host1:/# pvcreate /dev/drbd21
File descriptor 3 (/usr/share/bash-completion/completions) leaked on
pvcreate in
... etc
Maybe DRBD not will work nor will compile correctly while the server have a
"switch software" installed.
Now i have DRBD 8.4.5 working very well without openvswitch, the next week
the servers will be in production.
Best regads
Cesar
- Original Message -
From: &
Hi to all
I have the same problem, but in my case is a serious problem, i get these
error messages:
Starting DRBD resources:[
create res: r1 r2
prepare disk: r1 r2
adjust disk: r1:failed(apply-al:255) r2
adjust net: r1 r2
]
<1>received netlink packet for minor 14, while expecting 2
regards
Cesar Peschiera
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan"
To: "Cesar Peschiera"
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DRBD-user] drbd storage size
Hi Cesar,
On 10/25/2014 04:17 PM, Cesar Peschiera wrote:
Hi Ivan
Thanks for the link, it seem
Hi Meji
In three weeks i will have two Intel NIC X520-QDA1 of 40 Gb/s, according to
these link:
http://ark.intel.com/products/68672/Intel-Ethernet-Converged-Network-Adapter-X520-QDA1
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/network-adapters/converged-network-adapters/ethernet-x520-qda1-brief.html
Hi to all
I have configured DRBD with KVM, and is working well
I want that DRBD only send mails in case of find a "local-io-error" and not do
some other thing more, but i don't know how do it
I believe that i need add this option in the configuration (but i'm unsure):
common {
handlers
In my opinion, you never should depend of only a equipment, because you will
have a unique point of failure
Between Software or Hardware, i believe that the Hardware is more sure (It
hangs much less, or never crashes)
While the brand is more prestigious, better. Sonic wall is a excelent brand (
Hi to all
If somebody can help me, will be very appreciated
I like to do a questions about of security of data and as get the best
preformance without risk of lost of data when HA is applied
In Proxmox with KVM i have this options of cache for my VMs:
1- No cache
2- Direct sync
3- Write through
26 matches
Mail list logo
