On 7/13/23 11:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 13.07.23 um 10:53 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 7/13/23 10:49, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Am 13.07.23 um 10:32 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>> On 2023/7/10
Hi
Am 13.07.23 um 10:53 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 7/13/23 10:49, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Am 13.07.23 um 10:32 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On the other hand, are there
On 7/13/23 10:53, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On 13/07/2023 10:32, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC
On 7/13/23 10:49, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 13.07.23 um 10:32 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC
On 13/07/2023 10:32, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC connector even when
the hardware doesn't have it ?
If not
Hi
Am 12.07.23 um 17:05 schrieb Sui Jingfeng:
Hi,
I'm here join to the discussion. Because I know a little about aspeed BMC.
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 07/07/2023 09:30, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 18:37 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
[...]
You could
Hi
Am 13.07.23 um 10:32 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC connector even when
the hardware doesn't have it ?
If not
On 7/12/23 17:25, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>> On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>>
>>> On the other hand, are there any drawback to present a BMC connector even
>>> when the hardware doesn't have it ?
>>
>> If not properly setting up, I think you
On 12/07/2023 17:05, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
Hi,
I'm here join to the discussion. Because I know a little about aspeed BMC.
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 07/07/2023 09:30, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 18:37 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
[...]
You could out-comment
Hi,
I'm here join to the discussion. Because I know a little about aspeed BMC.
On 2023/7/10 16:07, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 07/07/2023 09:30, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 18:37 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
[...]
You could out-comment the VGA code in the ast driver for testing.
On 07/07/2023 09:30, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 18:37 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
[...]
You could out-comment the VGA code in the ast driver for testing.
Oh, Thanks for the idea, I will try that.
The result is that I get a black screen on the remote BMC. So maybe
adding a
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 18:37 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
[...]
You could out-comment the VGA code in the ast driver for testing.
Oh, Thanks for the idea, I will try that.
The result is that I get a black screen on the remote BMC. So maybe
adding a remote/bmc connector will solve that.
Could
On 06/07/2023 13:31, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 06/07/2023 12:26, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 11:16 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
On 04/07/2023 18:45, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit
On 06/07/2023 12:26, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 11:16 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
On 04/07/2023 18:45, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if
Hi
Am 06.07.23 um 11:16 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
On 04/07/2023 18:45, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default resolution is
On Thu, 06 Jul 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> Yes, so maybe a better way would be to add a remote/bmc connector, with
> proper default resolution ?
> That will better reflect what the hardware does.
I'm afraid I don't know enough about the hardware or use case to say.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani
On 06/07/2023 11:32, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jul 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 04/07/2023 18:45, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID
On Thu, 06 Jul 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> On 04/07/2023 18:45, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>> On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default
On 04/07/2023 18:45, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default resolution is now 640x480 when no monitor is connected.
But Aspeed
On 04/07/2023 16:54, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default resolution is now 640x480 when no monitor is connected.
But Aspeed graphics is mostly used in servers, where no
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
> EDID on DP")
> The default resolution is now 640x480 when no monitor is connected.
> But Aspeed graphics is mostly used in servers, where no monitor
> is attached. This also
(cc: some people from commit fae7d186403e)
Am 04.07.23 um 16:19 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
Hi Jocelyn
Am 23.06.23 um 11:46 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default resolution is now 640x480 when no monitor is
Hi Jocelyn
Am 23.06.23 um 11:46 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe:
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default resolution is now 640x480 when no monitor is connected.
But Aspeed graphics is mostly used in servers, where no monitor
is attached. This
Since commit fae7d186403e ("drm/probe-helper: Default to 640x480 if no
EDID on DP")
The default resolution is now 640x480 when no monitor is connected.
But Aspeed graphics is mostly used in servers, where no monitor
is attached. This also affects the "remote" resolution to 640x480, which is
24 matches
Mail list logo