Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Lars Munch Christensen
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:19:33PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote: > I completely disagree. It sounds like software (indirect) rendering is > being used, as I get well over 800 frames a second with a V3 and over > 1600 fps with a V5 (single chip only) on my 1GHz Athlon. Frankly, > there's stuff in G

Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:19:33PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote: > I completely disagree. It sounds like software (indirect) rendering is > being used, as I get well over 800 frames a second with a V3 and over > 1600 fps with a V5 (single chip only) on my 1GHz Athlon. Frankly, > there's stuff in G

Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Nathan Hand
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 08:33:24PM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote: > > Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with > > gears. > > > > I get 125.623 frames/s. > > > > The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beg

Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Gareth Hughes
Joseph Carter wrote: > > Those numbers are probably fairly typical, if very poor compared to win32 > numbers. Glide 3 is not exactly fast in Linux unfortunately. As a > result, 3dfx cards with DRI yield rather disappointing results. Don't > take that as a sign to go out and upgrade just yet th

Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Gareth Hughes
Kreuzritter2000 wrote: > > Ok > > Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with > gears. > > I get 125.623 frames/s. > > The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march. > The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram. > gears was startet under KDE2.1 Don't use

Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote: > Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with > gears. > > I get 125.623 frames/s. > > The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march. > The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram. > gears was

Re: [Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Ronald de Man
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote: > Ok > > Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with > gears. > > I get 125.623 frames/s. > > The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march. > The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram. > ge

[Dri-devel] 125.624 frames/s in gears with Voodoo3 2000 PCI, is this good or bad?

2001-03-31 Thread Kreuzritter2000
Ok Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with gears. I get 125.623 frames/s. The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march. The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram. gears was startet under KDE2.1 Is the benchmark value good or bad? In other words, did

Re: [Dri-devel] Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Gareth Hughes
Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Greg Hughes wrote: > > > > Inline assembly experts, > > > > I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77, > > which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This > > compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying

Re: [Dri-devel] New Radeon problems...

2001-03-31 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 07:57:52PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > There's definately something wrong. Everytime I go to reboot from the > serial console after this happens, my computer locks up :-) Can you SysRq a reboot? s, u, and b - easy to remember. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Dri-devel] New Radeon problems...

2001-03-31 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
There's definately something wrong. Everytime I go to reboot from the serial console after this happens, my computer locks up :-) Adam - Original Message - From: "Joseph Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adam K Kirchhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "dri-devel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Satu

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: >Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 02:15:18 + >From: Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Mike A. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="windows-1255" >Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Inline assembly question > >URL

Re: [Dri-devel] New Radeon problems...

2001-03-31 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 05:10:14PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > I pulled the DRI cvs this afternoon (main trunk) and gave it a whirl. > X never fully starts up. After about five-ten seconds, the monitor puts > itself to sleep and /var/log/XFree86.0.log ends with: This happens to me too, howe

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
URL?? The "rawhide" dir has disappeared from redhat's FTP sites Hetz On Sunday 01 April 2001 00:05, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Greg Hughes wrote: > >Inline assembly experts, > > > >I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77, > >which is much better th

[Dri-devel] Re: Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Greg Hughes wrote: >Inline assembly experts, > >I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77, >which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This >compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to >build the mesa-3-5

Re: [Dri-devel] Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Keith Whitwell
Greg Hughes wrote: > > Inline assembly experts, > > I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77, > which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This > compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to > build the mesa-3-5-branch. It

Re: [Dri-devel] Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
Try upgrading to GCC 2.96-79 - I think it's fixed there.. Hetz On Saturday 31 March 2001 23:27, Greg Hughes wrote: > Inline assembly experts, > > I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77, > which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This > compiler c

[Dri-devel] Inline assembly question

2001-03-31 Thread Greg Hughes
Inline assembly experts, I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77, which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to build the mesa-3-5-branch. It doesn't like the COPY_DWORDS macro

[Dri-devel] Re: New Radeon problems...

2001-03-31 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Same thing just happened with my G400. Adam On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > I pulled the DRI cvs this afternoon (main trunk) and gave it a whirl. > X never fully starts up. After about five-ten seconds, the monitor puts > itself to sleep and /var/log/XFree86.0.log ends with

[Dri-devel] New Radeon problems...

2001-03-31 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I pulled the DRI cvs this afternoon (main trunk) and gave it a whirl. X never fully starts up. After about five-ten seconds, the monitor puts itself to sleep and /var/log/XFree86.0.log ends with: 32 128x128 slots 21 256x256 slots 7 512x512 slots (

[Dri-devel] Re: APT-able Debian DRI CVS packages ready for testing.

2001-03-31 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over > just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for > both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software. On my mac