On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:09:32AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
On my
Inline assembly experts,
I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77,
which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This
compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to
build the mesa-3-5-branch. It doesn't like the COPY_DWORDS
Greg Hughes wrote:
Inline assembly experts,
I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77,
which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This
compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to
build the mesa-3-5-branch. It
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Greg Hughes wrote:
Inline assembly experts,
I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77,
which is much better than the 2.96 bundled with RedHat 7.0. This
compiler can build the xc tree from the trunk, but it chokes trying to
build the
URL??
The "rawhide" dir has disappeared from redhat's FTP sites
Hetz
On Sunday 01 April 2001 00:05, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Greg Hughes wrote:
Inline assembly experts,
I've been palying with RedHat 7.1 Beta. This ships with gcc 2.96.77,
which is much better than the
Ok
Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
gears.
I get 125.623 frames/s.
The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
gears was startet under KDE2.1
Is the benchmark value good or bad?
In other words,
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 04:40:44AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
Ok
Now i benchmarkt my Voodoo3 2000 PCI card under XFree-DRI with
gears.
I get 125.623 frames/s.
The tdfx driver was branch 3.0, dri-cvs from beginning of march.
The computer is an Athlon 500 MHz 128 MB ram.
gears was
