[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Guide to debugging DRI installations

2001-06-21 Thread Frank Worsley
> I put the page together after trying to walk thru several > people with buggy Redhat installs. For some reason things like ldd or > strace are not as well known to new users as they should be. The problem here is not so much that people don't know about LDD, but that they should not have to kn

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Guide to debugging DRI installations

2001-06-21 Thread volodya
I've made some corrections and included a link to DRI documentation area. Michel: I don't mind if you fold this into dri guide or mirror it or something. I put the page together after trying to walk thru several people with buggy Redhat installs. For some reason things like ldd or strace are n

Re: [Dri-devel] [volodya@mindspring.com: [Xpert]Guide to debuggingDRI installations]

2001-06-21 Thread volodya
I have made the correction - please let me know if I missed anything. Vladimir Dergachev ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] 4.1.0 and ATI 128 Rage Mobility

2001-06-21 Thread Jordan Crouse
On Thursday 21 June 2001 14:55, Michel Dänzer mentioned: > Jordan Crouse wrote: > > I am running Linux 2.4.5-ac16 and XFree86 4.1.0 with an ATI Rage Mobility > > LF Rev 2 chipset (Renderer string: Mesa DRI Rage 128 20010405 M3 AGP 2x > > x86/MMX/SSE) and I am getting the the old familiar "black f

Re: [Dri-devel] 4.1.0 and ATI 128 Rage Mobility

2001-06-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
Jordan Crouse wrote: > I am running Linux 2.4.5-ac16 and XFree86 4.1.0 with an ATI Rage Mobility LF > Rev 2 chipset (Renderer string: Mesa DRI Rage 128 20010405 M3 AGP 2x > x86/MMX/SSE) and I am getting the the old familiar "black flicker" problem. > Unfortunately, the old familar Option "UseCCE

Re: [Dri-devel] G400 GL_DECAL patch

2001-06-21 Thread Karl Lessard
Is there a lot of people experiencing problems getting this patch running correctly? As I said, the patch needs to be applied on a fresh install of XFree86 4.1.0 and disabledEXTCompiledVertexArray should be set to "1" in the ClientPrefs file for Tribes2 players. It is important to make this cl

Re: [Dri-devel] [volodya@mindspring.com: [Xpert]Guide to debuggingDRI installations]

2001-06-21 Thread volodya
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Jens Owen wrote: > Vladimir, > > Your page looks very helpful. Thanks for putting it together. The only > comment I have is regarding your first miscellaneous comment: > > "While hardware 3d is active nothing except your Xserver should be > accessing your video card - o

[Dri-devel] 4.1.0 and ATI 128 Rage Mobility

2001-06-21 Thread Jordan Crouse
All - I am running Linux 2.4.5-ac16 and XFree86 4.1.0 with an ATI Rage Mobility LF Rev 2 chipset (Renderer string: Mesa DRI Rage 128 20010405 M3 AGP 2x x86/MMX/SSE) and I am getting the the old familiar "black flicker" problem. Unfortunately, the old familar Option "UseCCEFor2D" "true" tric

[Dri-devel] Mach64: Specifications

2001-06-21 Thread Manuel Teira
Hello. I've been looking for a programmer's manual or some documentation of this kind, for the ATI Mach64 chipset. I'm looking for something in the style of the Intel i810 Chipset Family Programmers Reference Manual (Ref: 298026-001). Do you know about any document of this kind? Has ATI releas

[Dri-devel] r128 version bump

2001-06-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brian Paul wrote: > No need to bump version number as this value isn't used anywhere in > the kernel module. Speaking of a version bump, it looks like the _major_ of the r128 driver in the trunk needs to be bumped (see discussion on the Xpert list). I'm reluctant to do it myself as I don't h

Re: [Dri-devel] Matrox G450 *PCI* Support?

2001-06-21 Thread David S. Miller
Gareth Hughes writes: > Memory allocation. It's hard to get a large chunk of physically > contiguous memory, which the MGA needs to do PCI DMA. Not impossible, > just a low priority. It would be nice to not just have a hacked-up > solution like the Utah-GLX driver. There are systems where

Re: [Dri-devel] GL_DECAL and texture corruption fixes for MGA driver

2001-06-21 Thread Gareth Hughes
Jaakko Niemi wrote: > > >From: Karl Lessard > >Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] GL_DECAL and texture corruption fixes for MGA driver > >Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:28:46 -0700 > > > > > > > >You're right, mgaConvertTexture needs to handle RGB5_A1 as a special > >case. But there is no need to redefined MGAP

Re: [Dri-devel] GL_DECAL and texture corruption fixes for MGA driver

2001-06-21 Thread Jaakko Niemi
>From: Karl Lessard >Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] GL_DECAL and texture corruption fixes for MGA driver >Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:28:46 -0700 > > > >You're right, mgaConvertTexture needs to handle RGB5_A1 as a special >case. But there is no need to redefined MGAPACKCOLOR1555, check >MGAPACKCOLOR

Re: [Dri-devel] Matrox G450 *PCI* Support?

2001-06-21 Thread Gareth Hughes
Geoff Reedy wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:50:03PM -0400, Karl Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said > > > > There is a AGP-to-PCI bridge on a G450 PCI. The thing is that you have a > > AGP chip on your PCI card , and the bridge is used to connect the chip > > on a PCI bus. But I don't know why

Re: [Dri-devel] Matrox G450 *PCI* Support?

2001-06-21 Thread Geoff Reedy
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 01:50:03PM -0400, Karl Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said > > There is a AGP-to-PCI bridge on a G450 PCI. The thing is that you have a > AGP chip on your PCI card , and the bridge is used to connect the chip > on a PCI bus. But I don't know why DRI only supports AGP cards,

[Dri-devel] G400 GL_DECAL patch

2001-06-21 Thread Gareth Hughes
I've been banging my head on this for too long without much luck. Karl, can you send me (and me only) a snapshot of Mesa/demos/texenv running with your patch applied? I'm getting incorrect rendering no matter what I do, and Tribes2 is still broken (the landscape is clearly being textured incorre

Re: [Dri-devel] Texture sizes larger than screen dimensions + blanking at x=1355

2001-06-21 Thread Gareth Hughes
Brian Paul wrote: > > That's what I was worried about. Changing the SAREA layout would > require bumping the version number. However, I've grepped all the > Radeon sources and it doesn't appear that RADEON_MAX_TEXTURE_LEVELS > is used at all in the SAREA or kernel code. I'll have to do some >

Re: [Dri-devel] Texture sizes larger than screen dimensions + blanking at x=1355

2001-06-21 Thread Brian Paul
Gareth Hughes wrote: > > Brian Paul wrote: > > > > I've looked into this a bit more. Looks like the token > > is incorrectly defined to be 11 in > > the current driver. It should be 12 in order to support 2Kx2K > > textures. It looks like this can safely be changed from 11 to 12 > > without a

Re: [Dri-devel] Max Radeon Texture size

2001-06-21 Thread Gareth Hughes
Philip Willoughby wrote: > > Just out of interest, does 2kx2k texture support mean 2048x2048 or 2050x2050 > (for borders?). I have never seen a graphics chip accelerate texture borders. All the Mesa-based drivers fall back to software rendering if you have them. -- Gareth

Re: [Dri-devel] Max Radeon Texture size

2001-06-21 Thread Philip Willoughby
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, Gareth Hughes wrote: >Brian Paul wrote: >> >> I've looked into this a bit more. Looks like the token >> RADEON_MAX_TEXTURE_LEVELS is incorrectly defined to be 11 in >> the current driver. It should be 12 in order to support 2Kx2K >> textures

Re: [Dri-devel] Framebuffer & DRI

2001-06-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
Fredrik Hegardt wrote: > Will using the matrox framebuffer cause me problems trying to use DRI? Possible. Some people tend to blame framebuffer devices for everything. ;) > I have: > > X410 > Matrox G450 > > Have tried everything and still can't get any OpenGL-apps to run. (The apps > are lin

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Guide to debugging DRI installations

2001-06-21 Thread John Tapsell
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Michel Dänzer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I've put up a "Guide to debugging DRI installations" at > > > > http://www.linuxvideo.org/gatos/dri-debug.html Excellent! > > I wonder if this is really necessary? Wouldn't it be better to point at the > DRI user guid

[Dri-devel] Framebuffer & DRI

2001-06-21 Thread Fredrik Hegardt
Hello! Will using the matrox framebuffer cause me problems trying to use DRI? I have: X410 Matrox G450 Have tried everything and still can't get any OpenGL-apps to run. (The apps are linked to the correct libGL, libGLU; DRI is enabled according to the X-log and Glxinfo). Gears hangs the mac

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Guide to debugging DRI installations

2001-06-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've put up a "Guide to debugging DRI installations" at > > http://www.linuxvideo.org/gatos/dri-debug.html I wonder if this is really necessary? Wouldn't it be better to point at the DRI user guide and improve it if needed? We all know the bad aspects of duplicatio