[Dri-devel] Radeon DRM

2002-02-28 Thread Roger While
Hi Anybody, Hope you can help me. I am getting the following (permanent) error on logging out from KDE : [drm]radeon_cp_indirect - process nnn using buffer owned by 0 nnn is the PID of the X server and the owned by is always 0. The effect is that

[Dri-devel] Inconsistent debug output statement on r128

2002-02-28 Thread José Fonseca
On r128_tex.c the 't' debug output statement on r128AllocTexObj shouldn't be there and has no meaning. static r128TexObjPtr r128AllocTexObj( struct gl_texture_object *texObj ) { r128TexObjPtr t; if ( R128_DEBUG DEBUG_VERBOSE_API ) { fprintf( stderr, __FUNCTION__( %p, %p )\n,

[Dri-devel] Mach64 work

2002-02-28 Thread Leif Delgass
Jose, I've been hacking on the tex/texmem/texstate stuff I just did an update and it looks like you've done much of the same thing, so I'm sending a diff for you to compare to your changes I'm going to download your changes and have a look before I continue I think the next big chunk is the

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 work

2002-02-28 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.02.28 10:56 Leif Delgass wrote: Jose, I've been hacking on the tex/texmem/texstate stuff. I just did an update and it looks like you've done much of the same thing, so I'm sending a diff for you to compare to your changes. I'm going to download your changes and have a look before

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 work

2002-02-28 Thread Leif Delgass
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, José Fonseca wrote: On 2002.02.28 10:56 Leif Delgass wrote: Jose, I've been hacking on the tex/texmem/texstate stuff. I just did an update and it looks like you've done much of the same thing, so I'm sending a diff for you to compare to your changes. I'm going

[Dri-devel] DRI vs. Xi Graphics performance

2002-02-28 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, I recently found out that Xi Graphics (http://www.xig.com), a company that provides accelerated 3D drivers for UNIX systems (including Linux), claimed that their drivers performances are much better than the DRI drivers for most graphic chips. Has any of you heard about them, and has

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI vs. Xi Graphics performance

2002-02-28 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi, I recently found out that Xi Graphics (http://www.xig.com), a company that provides accelerated 3D drivers for UNIX systems (including Linux), claimed that their drivers performances are much better than the DRI drivers for most

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI vs. Xi Graphics performance

2002-02-28 Thread Lance Stringham
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi, I recently found out that Xi Graphics (http://www.xig.com), a company that provides accelerated 3D drivers for UNIX systems (including Linux), claimed that their drivers performances are much better than the DRI

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI vs. Xi Graphics performance

2002-02-28 Thread Lance Stringham
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Lance Stringham wrote: Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Laurent Pinchart wrote: Hi, I recently found out that Xi Graphics (http://www.xig.com), a company that provides accelerated 3D drivers for UNIX systems (including Linux),

[Dri-devel] mach64-0-0-3-branch compiles, runs (and segfaults)

2002-02-28 Thread Leif Delgass
I've commited the last major chunk of the Mesa 4 merge, mainly in mach64_tris.c. The branch should now compile and run, but it needs debugging, as glxgears is still segfaulting. glxinfo reports: display: :0.0 screen:0 direct rendering: Yes server glx vendor string: SGI server glx version