Re: [Dri-devel] CVS - how should it be checked out? (mach64-0-0-3-branch)

On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, David Bronaugh wrote: > Is the mach64 code based on X 4.2.0? Is it based on X CVS? > > I'd like to know so I can build it properly here, and not bork up. > > David Bronaugh > It's based on 4.2.0. The branchpoint for mach64-0-0-3-branch was shortly after the initial Mesa

Re: [Dri-devel] Helping on Mach64

On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, José Fonseca wrote: [snip] > I didn't take over the DMA part, but that will eventually happen. For now > I'm moving all register programming from GL driver to the DRM, but faking > DMA at the same time. This will allow to prepare and debug everything very > well making th

[Dri-devel] CVS - how should it be checked out? (mach64-0-0-3-branch)

Is the mach64 code based on X 4.2.0? Is it based on X CVS? I'd like to know so I can build it properly here, and not bork up. David Bronaugh ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

José Fonseca wrote: > > So what do you think the future reserves for the open-source OSs? Just > closed-source drivers, perhaps some Wine-alike binary emulated Windows > drivers and a bunch of opensource legacy cards drivers..? > > I really hope not... and at least in with the cards that I may

Re: [Dri-devel] Helping on Mach64, was: New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

I was already expecting your e-mail! It never lates when some feature is announced/planned! ;-) Ok. I'll answer briefly to your questions, but don't ask much more because I can't and won't tell ya! On 2002.04.18 23:45 Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: > > At this moment I'm trying to debug to make thi

[Dri-devel] How to access the contents of a DMA buffer within the DRM?

This is in no way specific to mach64, so I would appreciate if someone could help on this. I would like to read the contents of a DMA buffer in a DRM IOCTL to process it with MMIO. Initialy I thought that "buf->address" gave me the pointer to that but after some debuggin output I saw that "buf

Re: [Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

On 2002.04.18 23:28 Gareth Hughes wrote: > Getting specs (full or otherwise) for DX8.1 and/or DX9.x compliant cards > may be difficult. You should also think about the effort it will take > to support the DX8 and beyond feature sets in a competitive manner. > > Now, I don't want to discourage

Re: [Dri-devel] Helping on Mach64, was: New cards (GPU's) from oldcard makers? DRI support?

> At this moment I'm trying to debug to make things work barely before I'll > make a new branch: mach64-0-0-4-branch. But tommorrow I'll create it Wow! So would you mind giving a shout here when something testable appears on FTP? So finally, did I get it right about this new branch?: 1. A lot of

Re: [Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

Smitty wrote: > > Are there any plans to implement drivers for these cards? > Have any of the manufactureres made an approach or started asking > questions about DRI? > > Or is this all completely off the radar screen at the moment? Getting specs (full or otherwise) for DX8.1 and/or DX9.x com

Re: [Dri-devel] Helping on Mach64, was: New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

On 2002.04.18 21:56 Felix Kühling wrote: > Hi, > > Am 18.04.2002 22:22 schrieb(en) José Fonseca: >>> Now, I'd love to see the 2D engine running too... *grin*. Could you >>> tell >>> me what's entailed to get that going? >> >> Nothing changed since this subject was brought up before. After DMA

Re: [Dri-devel] Helping on Mach64, was: New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

Hi, Am 18.04.2002 22:22 schrieb(en) José Fonseca: >> Now, I'd love to see the 2D engine running too... *grin*. Could you >> tell >> me what's entailed to get that going? > > Nothing changed since this subject was brought up before. After DMA > (which I'm preparing now) and AGP texturing is fin

Re: [Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

On 2002.04.18 20:42 David Bronaugh wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:17:44 +0100 > José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2002.04.18 19:12 Smitty wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > So up to five new GPU's / architectures which leads to the obvious > > > question(s) ... > > > > > > > With the inhum

Re: [Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:17:44 +0100 José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2002.04.18 19:12 Smitty wrote: > > ... > > > > So up to five new GPU's / architectures which leads to the obvious > > question(s) ... > > > > With the inhuman effort that it will be to support so many new GPUs the

Re: [Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

On 2002.04.18 19:12 Smitty wrote: > ... > > So up to five new GPU's / architectures which leads to the obvious > question(s) ... > With the inhuman effort that it will be to support so many new GPUs the obvious question I was expecting to read was "How can I help?"... > Or is this all complet

[Dri-devel] New cards (GPU's) from old card makers? DRI support?

Howzit? First there was the merger announcement by Creative and 3DLabs and the disclosure of their upcoming 76 million transistor GPU this holiday season. Then SiS surprised us at CeBit with their new SiS330 series of DirectX 8-compliant 3D accelerators. As if that wasn't enough, rumors