[Dri-devel] Re: new DRI resume binary snapshots and patches available

2002-12-11 Thread Juan Quintela
charl == Charl P Botha [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi charl New binary snapshots of the DRI suspend/resume modified Radeon drivers are charl available at http://cpbotha.net/dri_resume.html - these are the first DRI charl suspend/resume driver snapshots since the merge of XFree86 HEAD into the DRI

[Dri-devel] Re: [Swsusp] Re: new DRI resume binary snapshots and patchesavailable

2002-12-11 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 10:38, Juan Quintela wrote: could you told me what X version against are your dri patches? I am having a bad time (not being an XFree hacker) to merge the X part of your patch (the kernel patch was a no brainer). Basically my problem is that there is

[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nicolas ASPERT
Margit Schubert-While wrote: From drivers/char/agp/agpgart_be.c 4554,4559 { PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_845_G_0, PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, INTEL_I845_G, Intel, i845G, intel_830mp_setup }, Surely this is wrong or ?

[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nicolas ASPERT
Ooops... the patch I sent for 2.5.51 is wrong, since there I added a INTEL_I845 instead of a INTEL_I845_G (I know vim *does* weird things in my back 8-) Here is the correct one... Regards Nicolas. -- Nicolas Aspert Signal Processing Institute (ITS) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Nicolas ASPERT wrote: IIRC, the 845G is a new version of the 830MP chipset (it had been added by Abraham vd Merwe Graeme Fisher some months ago), but acts basically just as the 830MP. Therefore the entry is correct Or maybe if it gets

[Dri-devel] [,,,,°µ, ][]

2002-12-11 Thread
Title: ¿ø°íÁß°³, ÀÚºñÃâÆÇ, ÀÚ¼­Àü, ±âȹÃâÆÇ µî ÃâÆǼ­ºñ½º Àü¹®È¸»ç ÀÚºñÃâÆÇ ¾È³»(½ÃÁý,¼öÇÊ,¼Ò¼³,°æÁ¦,°æ¿µ,ó¼¼,±âŸ) dri-devel´Ô²² ÇູÀÌ ÇÔ²²ÇϽñ⸦ º÷´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼­ÇÎÁß¿¡¼­ ¾Ë°Ô

[Dri-devel] get it!

2002-12-11 Thread andreagill5540
YOU CAN LOOK AND FEEL YOUNGER !!! INCREASE ENERGY / ENDURANCE! LOSE WEIGHT BUILD MUSCLE at the same time!MEN: Increase Lean Muscle Mass Reduce Body Fat Increase Exercise Performance Increase Muscle Strength Increase EnduranceWOMEN: Reduce Control Body

[Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Nicolas ASPERT
Dave Jones wrote: I'll check the chipset docs when I get time, and add a comment if necessary. No-one seems to be complaining that it isn't working, so I'm inclined to believe your diagnosis is correct. I found the thread of lkml containing the discussion about that ... here is the link to

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Nicolas ASPERT wrote: IIRC, the 845G is a new version of the 830MP chipset (it had been added by Abraham vd Merwe Graeme Fisher some months ago), but acts basically just as the 830MP. Therefore the entry is correct Or maybe

RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ? Accoding to the official Linux pci database at http://www.yourvote.com the strings in the table should be: INTEL_I845, Intel, i845 E/MP/MZ, and INTEL_I845_G, Intel, i845 G/GL/GV/GE/PE, I think that would bring a lot more

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful -- it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so I'm just removing the lot. Cool, that gets my vote too 8-) Dave

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

2002-12-11 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful -- it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so I'm just removing the lot. Cool, that gets my vote

[Dri-devel] Re: Floating point exception

2002-12-11 Thread dax wood
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:34:16PM -0800, dax wood wrote: hello out there, I have a problem with the current dri cvs (trunk) for a Rage 128. the odd thing is that I got the damn thing to work (nicely), but with all programming i think i found a bug in the dri side of Mesa 5.0.(if

[Dri-devel] Problems with vblank IRQ on G400

2002-12-11 Thread Ian Romanick
Has anybody run into problems with the vblank interrupt support on G400? In mgaWaitForVBlank the 'if ( !mmesa-mgaScreen-irq )' test fails (i.e., user mode thinks there's an IRQ), but in the kernel mga_wait_vblank returns with errno set to EINVAL. THe only was I can see that this would happen is

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM Kernel Questions

2002-12-11 Thread D. Hageman
Alan, What would you like to see be implemented to help get the job done. In other words, what do you need from the DRI team? On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 20:12, D. Hageman wrote: I have noticed some feedback from Alan and Linus already on this list. Is