Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Spott
Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 22:33, Martin Spott wrote: >> Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [...] >> > 3. Since all three cases center around the use of materials, I think >> > it's really just one bug. Does anyone know if NWN or Fightgear use >> > g

[Dri-devel] Problems with dri-trunk on Tibook IV

2003-07-21 Thread Leigh Dyer
Hi, I've just been lucky enough to get a 1Ghz Powerbook G4 with 64Mb Radeon Mobility 9000 to work on, and I've been having a little trouble getting X and DRI working nicely. The process so far has been: 1. Installed debian sid (following the branden's ibook page) 2. Installed Daniel Stone's XFree

Re: [Dri-devel] GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS_ARB = 2 Limit

2003-07-21 Thread Marci
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 22:50:17 +0200 Andreas Stenglein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, thanks for your answer :) I have an R200 , I've installed the lastest DRI driver, but my GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS_ARB remains 2 . I see u have made a patch for radeon , is R200 included or is only for radeon? If it

Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Ian Romanick wrote: 3. Since all three cases center around the use of materials, I think it's really just one bug. Does anyone know if NWN or Fightgear use glMaterial? Running nwn with gdb shows r200ColorMaterial gets called about 4 times per frame, r200UpdateMaterial a _lot_ more often. No ide

Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 22:33, Martin Spott wrote: > Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > 3. Since all three cases center around the use of materials, I think > > it's really just one bug. Does anyone know if NWN or Fightgear use > > glMaterial? > > Maybe some FlightGear developer

Re: [Dri-devel] FW: What's going on DRI cvs server

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Spott
Alexander Stohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can someone answer this request for DRI tarballs? The required link is about on the middle of the WWW main page, I think he can't miss it if he tries, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! --

Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Spott
Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > 3. Since all three cases center around the use of materials, I think > it's really just one bug. Does anyone know if NWN or Fightgear use > glMaterial? Maybe some FlightGear developer can comment on this ? Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - i

Re: [Dri-devel] GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS_ARB = 2 Limit

2003-07-21 Thread Andreas Stenglein
Am 2003.07.20 12:20:03 +0200 schrieb(en) Marci: > Hi, this limit of 2 makes texture render slower than it could be , there is a > possibility that in the near future this limit will be eliminated? Which card do you have? radeon, R200, intel? I "made" a patch to the radeon driver a few weeks ago

Re: [Dri-devel] dri, ati and xig drivers comparison

2003-07-21 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Michael wrote: Roland Scheidegger wrote: Slightly OT, but here's an article which compares the dri drivers, ATI's binary driver and the driver from XiG Summit on a 9000pro: http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux/ati_linux_comp.html Have you tried comparing the performance between dri

MANY THANKS :-) Re: [Dri-devel] anonymus cvs access ... how / where to get tarball

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Zimmermann
THANKS DIETER, THANKS to Cummunity ... for all your help ... got source via rsync from mirror :-) see eMail below ... Greating to all and have fun with Linux :-) Martin Dieter Nützel schrieb: > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 15:44 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 15:03, Martin Zimmermann

Re: [Dri-devel] What about "bufferSize.diff" and "radeon-new-buffer.diff"?

2003-07-21 Thread Ian Romanick
Dieter Nützel wrote: "bufferSize.diff" is bigger: Index: xf86glx.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/GL/mesa/src/X/xf86glx.c,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 xf86glx.c --- xf86glx.c 7 May 2003 17:47:59 -000

Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Ian Romanick
Bertrand Lamy wrote: hello everybody I have found 3 bugs in the DRI driver. See the attached file for description. Each program is the 'minimal' code to get the bug. I also give my computer configuration. I am quite sure that the bugs lie in the driver cause: - it does not bug when using mesa an

[Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting reminder

2003-07-21 Thread Ian Romanick
This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or 5:00PM EDT or 2:00PM PDT, if you prefer). Time zone conversion available at: http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc Logs of previous IR

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] MGA texturing patches

2003-07-21 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:54:31AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:51:09PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> > >>>mga_texenv.patch: > >>>- Fix all texenv modes for all texformats on G400. > >>> > >>>- Implement GL_DECAL

Re: [Dri-devel] What about "bufferSize.diff" and "radeon-new-buffer.diff"?

2003-07-21 Thread Ian Romanick
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 16:47, Dieter Nützel wrote: "radeon-new-buffer.diff" is these one-liner: Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. Index: radeon_tcl.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv

Re: [Dri-devel] dri, ati and xig drivers comparison

2003-07-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 21:23 schrieb Roland Scheidegger: > Slightly OT, but here's an article which compares the dri drivers, ATI's > binary driver and the driver from XiG Summit on a 9000pro: > http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/atilinux/ati_linux_comp.html [-] 3D Games Performance Unrea

[Dri-devel] FW: What's going on DRI cvs server

2003-07-21 Thread Alexander Stohr
can someone answer this request for DRI tarballs? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 08:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Request to mailing list Dri-announce rejected Importance: High Hello Admin, Thanks for your anser

Re: [Dri-devel] What about "bufferSize.diff" and"radeon-new-buffer.diff"?

2003-07-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 16:47, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > "radeon-new-buffer.diff" is these one-liner: > > Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. > Index: radeon_tcl.c > === > RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/

Re: [Dri-devel] anonymus cvs access ... how / where to get tarball

2003-07-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 16:44, Dieter Nützel wrote: > Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 15:44 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 15:03, Martin Zimmermann wrote: > > > I have heard and I see it's hard to get access via anonymous cvs ... > > > > Hard, but not impossible. Whenever I have to deal wi

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] MGA texturing patches

2003-07-21 Thread Ian Romanick
Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:51:09PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: Ville Syrjälä wrote: mga_texenv.patch: - Fix all texenv modes for all texformats on G400. - Implement GL_DECAL using linear blend mode. The G400 docs aren't very clear on this subject so I'm not entirely sure if

[Dri-devel] What about "bufferSize.diff" and "radeon-new-buffer.diff"?

2003-07-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Hello Keith, "radeon-new-buffer.diff" is these one-liner: Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. Index: radeon_tcl.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_tcl.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.

Re: [Dri-devel] anonymus cvs access ... how / where to get tarball

2003-07-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Montag, 21. Juli 2003 15:44 schrieb Michel Dänzer: > On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 15:03, Martin Zimmermann wrote: > > I have heard and I see it's hard to get access via anonymous cvs ... > > Hard, but not impossible. Whenever I have to deal with anonymous CVS at > sf.net, I keep trying quickly, and it

Re: [Dri-devel] dri activate problem with radeon 7500 M

2003-07-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 18:53, Norbert Preining wrote: > > SHORT SUMMARY: > Radeon 7500M, agp support working, but AGP cannot be activated > DRI not activated with latest radeon driver from dri.sf.net [...] > So interestingly > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available > but I do

Re: [Dri-devel] [Bug 271] "euphoria" (really-slick screensavers) repeatably locks up system

2003-07-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Samstag, 19. Juli 2003 17:37 schrieb Richard Neill: > Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2003 16:16 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >>http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-07 > >> 10:16 ---

Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 00:00, Bertrand Lamy wrote: > > I have found 3 bugs in the DRI driver. See the attached file for description. Each > program is the 'minimal' code to get the bug. > I also give my computer configuration. > > I am quite sure that the bugs lie in the driver cause: > - it does

Re: [Dri-devel] anonymus cvs access ... how / where to get tarball

2003-07-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 15:03, Martin Zimmermann wrote: > > I have heard and I see it's hard to get access via anonymous cvs ... Hard, but not impossible. Whenever I have to deal with anonymous CVS at sf.net, I keep trying quickly, and it usually works within ten tries or so. Otherwise, José has s

Re: [Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Keith Whitwell
Bertrand Lamy wrote: hello everybody I have found 3 bugs in the DRI driver. See the attached file for description. Each program is the 'minimal' code to get the bug. I also give my computer configuration. I am quite sure that the bugs lie in the driver cause: - it does not bug when using mesa and

[Dri-devel] anonymus cvs access ... how / where to get tarball

2003-07-21 Thread Martin Zimmermann
Hello everybody, I have heard and I see it's hard to get access via anonymous cvs ... is it possible to get actual tarball via http / ftp somewhere ... Thanks Martin --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run mult

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] MGA texturing patches

2003-07-21 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:51:09PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > mga_texenv.patch: > > - Fix all texenv modes for all texformats on G400. > > > > - Implement GL_DECAL using linear blend mode. > > The G400 docs aren't very clear on this subject so I'm not entirely sure > >

[Dri-devel] [TRIVIAL] Re: [2.5 patch] kill 3 occurences of __NO_VERSION__: Patch is closed.

2003-07-21 Thread Rusty Trivial Russell
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:15:13AM +, Trivial Patch Monkey wrote: > Patch is closed. > > Status of this patch: > 2.5:Included in 2.5.73-bk1 >... Only the first of the three occurences of __NO_VERSION__ was removed, the patch below t

[Dri-devel] 3 bugs with DRI on ATI radeon 7500 M7 card

2003-07-21 Thread Bertrand Lamy
hello everybody I have found 3 bugs in the DRI driver. See the attached file for description. Each program is the 'minimal' code to get the bug. I also give my computer configuration. I am quite sure that the bugs lie in the driver cause: - it does not bug when using mesa and no 3D card (program

[Dri-devel] [ dri-Bugs-774924 ] screensaver=[drm:r128_freelist_get] *ERROR* returning NULL!

2003-07-21 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #774924, was opened at 2003-07-21 06:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100387&aid=774924&group_id=387 Category: ATI OpenGL Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Su

[Dri-devel] Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.

2003-07-21 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require attention. All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and decid