http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-08 03:38 ---
I have agp 320M with packard bell laptop. tried with 2.4.22-pre4
and 2.6.0test2. No problem with agp no problem with drm kernel module everything
is found but when i start
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-08 04:22 ---
Some traces from 2.6.0-test2. Starting from modprobe radeon.o
Aug 2 10:10:10 chinky kernel: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.8.0 20020828 on minor
Aug 2 10:10:32 chinky kernel:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-08 04:30 ---
Note that the CPusecTimeout value does not have any significant effect
on the radeon driver. Well, it does make things jerky. But it does
not effect or reduce the
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at them, and
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:57:14PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
| ...
| If we take away the ability to add functions to the GLX function table,
| is it really useful for drivers to be able to add new extensions at all?
| That would also remove the need for the force_client parameter to
|
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-08 08:22 ---
sorry problem fixed
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.xfree86.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for
On Gwe, 2003-08-01 at 23:54, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 18:33, Ian Romanick wrote:
This does make one subtle, but VERY important change to the policy
carried out by the driver's init function. Right now all of the drivers
will try to run even if they don't recognize
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dri-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dri-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dri-|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've read previous threads of this list, and I've found an S3 DRI driver
in alpha state.
I've tried to compile it, it needs xfree 4.2.0 source: I've installed
it, but the install program says that it's not the xfree86 4.2.0 source
code, even if it's.
The installer program has this synopsis:
Giustiniano,
Do you mean the savage driver? The savage driver isn't working
yet, it doesn't even compile everything and it needs some work. I'm already
studying it and trying to make it work but any help will be very welcome.
bye.
At 07:52 PM 2/8/2003, Giustiniano wrote:
I've read
14 matches
Mail list logo
