[Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Rage128/Radeon framebuffer updates

2003-08-16 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 03:24, Jon Smirl wrote: linux/pci_ids.h just had a check-in which caused a big merge conflict with my patch. I have tried to sort it out. Please check Radeon PCI IDs and chip families in radeonfb driver. It is important that the PCI IDs of secondary devices be marked

[Dri-devel] Your Bugzilla buglist needs attention.

2003-08-16 Thread bugadmin
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.] You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Rage128/Radeon framebuffer updates

2003-08-16 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The big picture here is that aty128fb and radeonfb have not had their PCI ID tables updated since 2.6 was started. Any hardware made since then can't use the framebuffer drivers. So you still go to ROM unconditionally... Well, we should get

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Rage128/Radeon framebufferupdates

2003-08-16 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 18:19, Jon Smirl wrote: --- Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The big picture here is that aty128fb and radeonfb have not had their PCI ID tables updated since 2.6 was started. Any hardware made since then can't use the framebuffer drivers. Yup, and

[Dri-devel] Re: Radeon 7500 rather slow

2003-08-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
In gmane.comp.video.dri.devel, you wrote: Is my RV200 QW a regular Radeon 7500 or some lame el cheapo model? What's the expected glxgears rate for my kind of setup? For comparison, I have a cheap clone radeon card also with RV200 QW chip, 64MB SDR Ram and passive cooling (as an indication

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Radeon 7500 rather slow

2003-08-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 21:49, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: One more thing that may influence the performance is your screen resolution and refresh rate as the refresh consumes memory bandwidth. It's just plain 72 Hz, nothing special. IIRC there used to be an inexplicable performance drop at

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-16-08 22:21 --- Hm, another problem that's

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-08-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-16-08 23:19 --- I tried replacing the file

[Dri-devel] rage/radeon fb driver patch again!

2003-08-16 Thread Jon Smirl
linux/pci_ids.h changed which stomped my patch again. I am really getting tired of editing patches consiting of hundreds of hex numbers. I spent a full day collecting this set of Rage and Radeon PCI IDs and it is a real pain that it is being added to pci_ids.h piecemeal. This patch sorts the list,