On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 19:11, David Mosberger wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 17:58:55 +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Benjamin flush_tlb_kernel_range((unsigned long) addr, (unsigned long) addr +
size);
Benjamin Why this flush ? I don't see why one would need to
Brian Paul wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Currently, the only functions that are aliased like this are both
GLX_SGI_make_current_read functions, a few GLX_SGIX_fbconfig
functions, and glXGetCurrentDisplayEXT (from GLX_EXT_import_context
and GLX 1.2). Since
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:12, Korosi Akos wrote:
Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] rta:
The latest working snapshot is r200-20030819.
The XFree86 log of the latest working snapshot is at the end
of this mail
(so you can see the differences if you need).
The first not working snapshot is
If memory serves, I believe radeon_probe.c gets compiled into ati_drv.o
so you'll need a new ati_drv.o as well.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:12, Korosi Akos wrote:
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ãrta:
The latest working snapshot is
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:46, Korosi Akos wrote:
Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:12, Korosi Akos wrote:
Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] rta:
The latest working snapshot is r200-20030819.
The XFree86 log of the latest working snapshot is at the end
Ian Romanick wrote:
Korosi Akos wrote:
Section Device
Identifier Videocard0
Driver radeon
VideoRam131072
Option AGPMode4
#Option AGPSize128
# === disable PnP Monitor ===
#Option NoDDC
# === disable/enable
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
- Original Message -
From: Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DRI developer's list [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: [Mesa3d-dev] Question about glcore.h
I have a question about the __GLcontextModesRec structure in glcore.h.
Is it
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:38:05 +0200, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Michel So I take it you guys want me to commit this patch to DRI CVS? :)
The patch looks fine to me.
--david
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 10:33, Korosi Akos wrote:
Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If memory serves, I believe radeon_probe.c gets compiled
into ati_drv.o
so you'll need a new ati_drv.o as well.
And where do I need to get a new ati_drv.o from?
From DRI (somehow) or from a newer
Keith Harrison wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DRI developer's list [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 6:48 PM
Subject: [Mesa3d-dev] Question about glcore.h
I have a question about the __GLcontextModesRec structure in
Keith Harrison wrote:
I have a question about the __GLcontextModesRec structure in glcore.h.
Is it safe to extend that structure? I'd like to extend it to have the
additional fields that are in __GLXFBConfigRec (from DRI's
include/GL/glxint.h). If that were done, I could remove
__GLXFBConfigRec
I have something to add to this. Recently I tested gatos drivers going from dri to
gatos was
painless. However when I went back my computer locked up. I sent a report off to
gatos of my
findings. If it's helpfull I could try a gatos to fglrx and back to see if there are
any lockups.
Would
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:09:26 +0200 (CEST)
Korosi Akos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 10:33, Korosi Akos wrote:
Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If memory serves, I believe radeon_probe.c gets compiled
into
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-27-08 14:33 ---
export in shell of course
Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 10:33, Korosi Akos wrote:
Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If memory serves, I believe radeon_probe.c gets compiled
into ati_drv.o
so you'll need a new ati_drv.o as well.
And where do I need to get a new
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:43, Mike Mestnik wrote:
I have something to add to this. Recently I tested gatos drivers going
from dri to gatos was painless. However when I went back my computer
locked up.
That's because they have made incompatible changes to the DRM but
haven't changed its
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:02:48 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 23:52, Korosi Akos wrote:
(II) LoadModule: ati
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o
(EE) LoadModule: Module ati does not have a atiModuleData
data object.
Something
21 matches
Mail list logo
