[Dri-devel] UT2k3 again

2003-09-11 Thread Riot777
Hello sorry for asking same question again but my last was unaswered. What is actual status of Radeon DRI drivers with UT2k3 Engine. What must be done and what has been done. What we need etc. Is it possible tu run in actual states the Ut2003/unreal warfare engine. Best Regards Riot777 --

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] radeon mergedfb support for DRI CVS

2003-09-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 09:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 18:12, Michel Dnzer wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:59, Alex Deucher wrote: Factoring it out is not a problem. the question is what to do with it when I pull it out. create an external external libray like

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-09-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-09 06:25 --- I have done some tests:

Re: [Dri-devel] What about bufferSize.diff? (was Re: [Dri-users] NWN)

2003-09-11 Thread Keith Whitwell
Did this get resolved? I'm more than happy to commit the patch. Not really. I never heard anything from Leif about my issue with the patch. I suspect that it won't be a problem, though. I've yet to hear of any use having problems with the patch applied. At this point, we may as well

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] radeon mergedfb support for DRI CVS

2003-09-11 Thread Alex Deucher
I did some basic work on factoring out the common code and discussed it with Thomas Winischhofer (Sis maintainer and driving force behind mergedfb development). He is of the opinion that it is still too early to create a generic API for mergedfb. There is still no consensus on what the final

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] radeon mergedfb support for DRI CVS

2003-09-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 17:32, Alex Deucher wrote: I did some basic work on factoring out the common code and discussed it with Thomas Winischhofer (Sis maintainer and driving force behind mergedfb development). He is of the opinion that it is still too early to create a generic API for

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] radeon mergedfb support for DRI CVS

2003-09-11 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 18:12, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:59, Alex Deucher wrote: Factoring it out is not a problem. the question is what to do with it when I pull it out. create an external external libray like libXMergedFB.so or something like that? I was thinking

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314]

2003-09-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-09 16:47 --- hi, As other amilo users

Re: [Dri-devel] New gatos API.

2003-09-11 Thread Mike Mestnik
Hello Laurent, The main goal is to get a working DRI that has the new API, and maby some gatos bells and whistles. I'm assuming you read my post that recent DRI is to different from gatos. My plan was to diff gatos and DRI and weed ought all the changes that where depreciated. With that

RE: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] radeon mergedfb support for DRI CVS

2003-09-11 Thread Alexander Stohr
I did some basic work on factoring out the common code and discussed it with Thomas Winischhofer (Sis maintainer and driving force behind mergedfb development). He is of the opinion that it is still too early to create a generic API for mergedfb. There is still no consensus on what the

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] No 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-09-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-09 03:32 --- I have kernel 2.4.21