[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-10-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-10 19:34 --- As you'll see when you

[Dri-devel] weird corruption with r200

2003-10-11 Thread Alex Deucher
I just got my 9200 up and running but I'm seeing some weird behavior. 3d works fine if I run in single head mode. however, if I run with mergedfb I get weird corruption in fullscreen apps like screen savers. for example, if I run the atlantis screen saver, there appears to be "junk" from previou

Re: [Dri-devel] [Announce] config-0-0-1-branch merged to the trunk

2003-10-11 Thread Felix Kühling
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 01:49:27 +0200 Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 22:05, Felix Kühling wrote: > > > > earlier today I finally merged the config-0-0-1-branch into the trunk. > > Congratulations for the good work! Thanks. > > > This means that most environment

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Snapshots

2003-10-11 Thread Felix Kühling
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 04:20:58 -0400 (EDT) "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Felix [ISO-8859-1] Kühling wrote: > > >there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was > >disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the > >problem w

[Dri-devel] [Bug 314] 3D support for Radeon IGP chips

2003-10-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-10 17:01 --- I have some success wi

Re: [Dri-devel] One driver binary for fbdev and XFree86 vs. internal interface changes

2003-10-11 Thread José Fonseca
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:57:00AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > The context problems are even bigger than I thought. In order to remove > the call to XF86DRICreateContext in dri_util.c, I had to add a call to > drmCreateContext. However, it turns out that this DRM call is root-only. > > Can so

[Dri-devel] [Bug 778] DRM on IA64 deadlocks DRM client & X Server

2003-10-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Dri-devel] Re: Snapshots

2003-10-11 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Felix [ISO-8859-1] Kühling wrote: >there were 2 reports from snapshot users on dri-users that DRI was >disabled with the new configuration stuff. In at least one case the >problem was that libexpat was not installed on the system. Could the >snapshot build be changed to link t

[Dri-devel] sync radeon driver with Hui's latest patch

2003-10-11 Thread Alex Deucher
I recently synced up my DRI tree with Hui's latest patch from xfree86 cvs. I need the DVI code for my new 9200. Would anyone object to me adding this to DRI cvs? I'm using it now with no problems so far. Thanks, Alex __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - w

Re: [Dri-devel] One driver binary for fbdev and XFree86 vs. internal interface changes

2003-10-11 Thread Ian Romanick
Ian Romanick wrote: The context related routines, it turns out, are a big, BIG problem. However, the problem is not on the client-side. It's on the server-side. [snip] There are a couple other issues. The current interface is not used. Not even the gamma driver does any useful work in its