Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
Thank you for your informative reply. --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm currently unable to define a clone mode where one screen is > > smaller > > then the other. My thoughts are "1024x768_1024x768" == "1024x768" vs > > "1024x768

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread David Bronaugh
Mike Mestnik wrote: Thank you for your informative reply. --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm currently unable to define a clone mode where one screen is smaller then the other. My thoughts are "1024x768_1024x768" == "1024x768" vs "10

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you for your informative reply. > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm currently unable to define a clone mode where one screen is > > > smaller > > > then the other. My th

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- David Bronaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Mestnik wrote: > > >Thank you for your informative reply. > > > >--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I'm currently unable to define a clone mode where one scre

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you for your informative reply. > > > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > The problem I have is that my settup

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
I think I finaly get it. When we have a window grater then 2048, we need to run a GL command move the cliprect and run it again? The only way to find out where we need is to SW render the cmd. Won't this cut our framerate in half? Plus moving the cliprect for most of the drawing cmds, what abou

[patch] Re: Some questions regarding locks

2004-05-23 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 22 May 2004 16:04, Michel DÃnzer wrote: > On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 14:04, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > > It seems to me as if DRM(unlock) in drm_drv.h unlocks without checking > > whether the caller actually holds the global lock. There is no >

Re: Thread Local Storage libGL

2004-05-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Ian Romanick wrote: One thing about Jakub's patch is that, on x86, it eliminates the need for the specialized _ts_* versions of the dispatch functions. It basically converts the DISPATCH macro (as used in src/mesa/main/dispatch.c) from: #define DISPATCH(FUNC, ARGS, MESSAGE) \ (_glapi_Dispa

i830 texture compression support..

2004-05-23 Thread Dave Airlie
The attached patch provides s3tc (and broken fxt) texture compression support on the i8xx (x>30) chipsets, You need to apply the radeon/r200 patch from Roland first, Roland do you want to merge this patch into yours? So far I've tested this with texcmp - thats how I know FXT doesn't work, do we

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 11:32, Mike Mestnik wrote: > I think I finaly get it. When we have a window grater then 2048, we need > to run a GL command move the cliprect and run it again? The only way to > find out where we need is to SW render the cmd. Won't this cut our > framerate in half? Plus mo

Re: [patch] Re: Some questions regarding locks

2004-05-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 12:05, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > > > This sounds like an idea for you to play with, but I'm afraid it won't > > be useful very often in my experience: > > > > * getting rid of the offending client doesn't help with a wedged > > chip (some way to recover from tha

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thank you for your informative reply. > > > > > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: drm 830 problem

2004-05-23 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Keith Whitwell wrote: Andrà Ventura Lemos wrote: Not at all... This only happens with 2.6 kernels. Prior do the lockup, everything works (I can see it through ssh), but the display gets blank, and never comes back. On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 18:07, Keith Whitwell wrote: Do you mind if I take this to dri

Re: [r200] sigfault in update_light (current DRI and Mesa CVS)

2004-05-23 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2004 23:09 schrieb Dieter Nützel: > SunWave1 progs/demos# ./gears > Mesa: software DXTn compression/decompression available > Speicherschutzverletzung (core dumped) More on this with latest CVS: (gdb) r Starting program: /opt/Mesa/progs/demos/gears [New Thread 1079078016 (LWP

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] Memory management of AGP and VRAM

2004-05-23 Thread Alan Cox
On Gwe, 2004-05-21 at 17:48, Jon Smirl wrote: > There are two types of VTs - text and graphical. It is only practical to have a > single graphical VT because of the complexity of state swapping a graphical VT > at VT swap. Could have fooled me. I can switch between multiple DRI using X servers and

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] Memory management of AGP and VRAM

2004-05-23 Thread Keith Whitwell
Alan Cox wrote: On Gwe, 2004-05-21 at 17:48, Jon Smirl wrote: There are two types of VTs - text and graphical. It is only practical to have a single graphical VT because of the complexity of state swapping a graphical VT at VT swap. Could have fooled me. I can switch between multiple DRI using X s

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thank you for your informative reply. > > > > > > > > --- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 11:32, Mike Mestnik wrote: > > I think I finaly get it. When we have a window grater then 2048, we > need > > to run a GL command move the cliprect and run it again? The only way > to > > find out where we need is to SW render

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] Memory management of AGP and VRAM

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > On Gwe, 2004-05-21 at 17:48, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > >>There are two types of VTs - text and graphical. It is only practical > to have a > >>single graphical VT because of the complexity of state swapping a > graphical VT > >>at V

Re: Thread Local Storage libGL

2004-05-23 Thread Ian Romanick
Keith Whitwell wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: One thing about Jakub's patch is that, on x86, it eliminates the need for the specialized _ts_* versions of the dispatch functions. It basically converts the DISPATCH macro (as used in src/mesa/main/dispatch.c) from: #define DISPATCH(FUNC, ARGS, MESSAG

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 01:04, Mike Mestnik wrote: > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The 3D driver already handles several cliprects for when a window is > > partially obscured, SHAPE windows, ... That would just need to be > > extended to multiplex the cliprects on boundaries of mult

Re: Thread Local Storage libGL

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Assembly dispatch stubs are only generated for x86 and SPARC. It looks > like the #if test in dispatch.c is wrong, so that stubs don't even get > used on SPARC. In any case, Jakub's patch did modify the x86 assembly, > not the C version. I wasn't

Re: MergedFrameBuffer: New meta-mode syntax needed.

2004-05-23 Thread Mike Mestnik
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 01:04, Mike Mestnik wrote: > > --- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The 3D driver already handles several cliprects for when a window is > > > partially obscured, SHAPE windows, ... That would just need to be > > > e