On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 00:42, Dave Airlie wrote:
> works well, and the X team decide to do a decent X on mesa-solo on Jons
> super-DRM, now the super-DRM gets pushed via the X tree and distributions
> start relasing kernels with it merged into it and it never goes into the
> main tree... it won't ma
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:45:18 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dïnzer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 23:42 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >> I think yourself and Linus's ideas for a locking scheme look good, I also
> >
Alan Cox wrote:
What about if you want to use fb when in text mode (Because you get
200x75 on a 1600x1200 screen) AND run DRI because the rest of the time
you want to run fast 3D. Plus you want to be able to CTRL-ALT-F1/F2/F7
back & forth between X & fb... (i.e. how I currently use it but with
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 20:45 -0400, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dnzer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 23:42 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >>
> >> I think yourself and Linus's ideas for a locking scheme look good, I also
> >> know they won't please Jon to
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 23:42 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
I think yourself and Linus's ideas for a locking scheme look good, I also
know they won't please Jon too much as he can see where the potential
ineffecienes with saving/restore card state o
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 02:11:52 +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pci_request_regions() seems to allocate all possible IO and mem regions
> defined in the PCI BARs. I understand that putting this code in
> drm_probe presents an easy way to get the reservations, although I h
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 23:42 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I think yourself and Linus's ideas for a locking scheme look good, I also
> know they won't please Jon too much as he can see where the potential
> ineffecienes with saving/restore card state on driver swap are, especailly
> on running fbco
On 12.09.2004, at 21:24, Jon Smirl wrote:
Log message:
Fix error path in probe() to release resources if there is an error.
It's not particularly about this very change, more about the general
concept.
I see you moved the pci_request_regions() to the OS specific part. This
is very good, thanks
New version of dyn-minor patch. Basically the same code but I added
two new entry points for get/put of secondary minor numbers for
multi-head cards. I tested those with code that is not in the patch,
it will come in a later one.
Dave, if this looks ok can we check it in? My goal is not to change
> >
> > We already have a mechanism for this: suspend/resume.
>
> Jon, you're not making sense any more.
> This discussion is just ridiculous, and I don't think it's worth cc'ing me
> if people can't try to work together, since I'm sadly not going to have
> time to actually implement any of this m
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I think yourself and Linus's ideas for a locking scheme look good, I also
> know they won't please Jon too much as he can see where the potential
> ineffecienes with saving/restore card state on driver swap are, especailly
> on running fbcon and X on a
>
> > Alan, I agree with how you want to proceed with this, and keep things
> > stable, but anything short of a single card-specific driver looking after
> > the registers and DMA queueing and locking is going to have deficiencies
> > and the DRM has a better basis than the fb drivers,
>
> "I want
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1220
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-12 13:18 ---
I have a si
Marcello Maggioni wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:34:01 +0200, Roland Scheidegger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marcello Maggioni wrote:
My card is a 3D prophet Radeon 8500LE with R200 ,My drivers are the
lastest taken yesterday from CVS.
I've downloaded the demo , and the game seemed to run fine a
On Sul, 2004-09-12 at 12:36, Hamie wrote:
> But this relies on drivers co-operating with each other.
Only minimally, and providing the co-operation is easy the rest comes
out fine. We don't often get ide-disk and ide-cd people arguing over
whose fault something is
> Yeah. Would fglrx be more st
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 14:37, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:06:14 +0100, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 05:02:36PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > Alan, if you will commit Redhat to implementing all of the features
> > > referenced in this message
16 matches
Mail list logo
