[Bug 1786] OpenGL crash /w r128 on ppc

2004-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1786 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-04 18:23 --- Possible

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Ben Skeggs
Hello, The PCI ID is already added in the DRM branch of r300_driver. As for the AGP issues, I have no idea. Maybe they're related to the lockup, maybe not. cu, Nicolai I think the AGP issues *are* related to the lockup. I've just switched sysloggers, and switched to CVS XServer (was using

[Bug 3708] New: build failure in drivers/char/drm/gamma_drv.c:42 (missing structure member in included headers)

2004-11-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3708 Summary: build failure in drivers/char/drm/gamma_drv.c:42 (missing structure member in included headers) Kernel Version: 2.6.9 Status: NEW Severity: normal Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 3708] build failure in drivers/char/drm/gamma_drv.c:42 (missing structure member in included headers)

2004-11-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3708 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-06 02:27 --- Created an attachment (id=3969) -- (http://bugme.osdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=3969action=view) .config file for kernel report (gzipped) Sorry, didnt realize I could attach

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
Hi, On Saturday 06 November 2004 10:09, Ben Skeggs wrote: I think the AGP issues *are* related to the lockup. I've just switched sysloggers, and switched to CVS XServer (was using release 6.8 before). My previous problems still occurred, but I now seem to have a lot more debugging

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Ben Skeggs
As long as the X server works and uses the ring buffer, that would point towards a simple configuration problem. Perhaps you could post a log of glxinfo with LIBGL_DEBUG=all and RADEON_DEBUG=all? cu, Nicolai Hmm, I believe you may be right about the config problem, I'm not sure why I

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Ben Skeggs
r300_dri.so needs to get linked against expat. - ajax Yup, that did the trick. Thankyou. Any thoughts as to why it wasn't linked against expat when I built it the first time around? Ben. from glxinfo: disabling 3D acceleration name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering:

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Felix Kühling
Am So, den 07.11.2004 schrieb Ben Skeggs um 2:01: As long as the X server works and uses the ring buffer, that would point towards a simple configuration problem. Perhaps you could post a log of glxinfo with LIBGL_DEBUG=all and RADEON_DEBUG=all? cu, Nicolai Hmm, I believe you may

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Adam Jackson
On Saturday 06 November 2004 20:01, Ben Skeggs wrote: As long as the X server works and uses the ring buffer, that would point towards a simple configuration problem. Perhaps you could post a log of glxinfo with LIBGL_DEBUG=all and RADEON_DEBUG=all? cu, Nicolai Hmm, I believe you may be

DRI on DragonFly...

2004-11-06 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
So I'm trying to get the DRI working on DragonFlyBSD. Someone has created a series of patches for Xorg 6.8.1 which get it to compile and run on DragonFly. Direct Rendering gets enabled: (II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler (II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete (II)

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Alex Deucher
On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 20:09:45 +1100, Ben Skeggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, The PCI ID is already added in the DRM branch of r300_driver. As for the AGP issues, I have no idea. Maybe they're related to the lockup, maybe not. cu, Nicolai I think the AGP issues *are* related to

Re: [Fwd: r300 Report.]

2004-11-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 12:25 +0100, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: Okay, the new syslog has all the debug info. I notice the following line: Nov 7 07:37:58 disoft-dc [drm:radeon_cp_init_ring_buffer] writeback test failed The Radeon DRM source code has a comment indicating that writeback doesn't

Re: Texture profiling tool

2004-11-06 Thread Keith Whitwell
Owen Taylor wrote: Over a last few days, I've been working on a tool to allow watching a live view of the texture usage of a DRI application. I'm not going to go into a lot of detail here - there is a more complete description at: http://fishsoup.net/software/texturetop/ And an even more

[Bug 3708] build failure in drivers/char/drm/gamma_drv.c:42 (missing structure member in included headers)

2004-11-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3708 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Owner|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |bugs.osdl.org

[Bug 1773] DRI with radeon7500 causes lockups

2004-11-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-06 11:51 --- (In reply

Re: Texture profiling tool

2004-11-06 Thread Owen Taylor
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 18:11 +, Keith Whitwell wrote: My questions would be: - Is this interesting to anybody but me? It's been quite useful to me so far in just the couple of hours I've had it working... It's definitely interesting. Have you been using it to tune an

r200 (and rv100?) - no direct rendering with latest CVS

2004-11-06 Thread Jacek Popawski
2 days ago, after CVS update, I realized I can't get accelerated rendering. (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled but: OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect I have correct radeon.ko loaded, everything setup correctly (when I recompile older Mesa and copy r200_dri.so I have direct

Re: r200 (and rv100?) - no direct rendering with latest CVS

2004-11-06 Thread Jasmin Buchert
Hi, It's perhaps related to the problems I had a while ago while testing Xorg CVS Mesa CVS together. r200_dri.so had unresolved symbols and I fixed that with the patch from http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-develm=109812433626328w=2 (replaced $(MESAX86BUILDDIR)unshared with

__FUNCTION__ vs __func__

2004-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__ has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine for gcc 2.95. Any opposition? -- Eric Anholt

Re: r200 (and rv100?) - no direct rendering with latest CVS

2004-11-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 19:07 +0100, Jacek Popawski wrote: 2 days ago, after CVS update, Which tree of which CVS repository? I realized I can't get accelerated rendering. (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled but: OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect This means the problem is

Re: __FUNCTION__ vs __func__

2004-11-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Eric Anholt wrote: One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__ has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine for gcc 2.95. Any opposition? Most of linux-kernel still uses

Re: __FUNCTION__ vs __func__

2004-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 16:27, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__ has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine for

Re: r200 (and rv100?) - no direct rendering with latest CVS

2004-11-06 Thread Jacek Popawski
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 06:36:08PM -0500, Michel Dnzer wrote: LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo give any hints? Yes: libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 4.0.1 r200 (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so