Re: VIA command verifier.

2004-12-02 Thread Terry Barnaby
Thomas Hellström wrote: Hi. On Maw, 2004-11-30 at 20:09, Thomas Hellström wrote: Textures in AGP memory is currently not allowed, but they are disabled in the Mesa driver as well, for some reason. If they are allowed in the future, Texture address checks probably have to be implemented but that s

[Bug 1999] after installing cvs version of xorg when I use glxinfo X crashes

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 1999] after installing cvs version of xorg when I use glxinfo X crashes

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 1999] after installing cvs version of xorg when I use glxinfo X crashes

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-02 18:29 --- Created an att

[Bug 1999] after installing cvs version of xorg when I use glxinfo X crashes

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-02 18:06 --- please attach

[Bug 1999] New: after installing cvs version of xorg when I use glxinfo X crashes

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999 Summary: after installing cvs version of xorg when I use glxinfo

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Alan Swanson
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 19:54 +0100, Stephane Marchesin wrote: > >And is HyperZ fully working now? > > > Hmmm. It works, but there is a bit that we'll probably leave aside on > the R200 (hierarchical Z) because neither Roland nor me have an R200. I've been meaning to offer this for a while for the

Re: [r200] Latest Mesa CVS brake quake3 (-smp)

2004-12-02 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Dieter NÃtzel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 1. Dezember 2004 21:00 schrieb Dieter NÃtzel: Only empty/black window. Not r100-readpixels-3.patch or hyperz related. When I find time (tomorrow) I'll go back and see when it changed. I'm 17 days back (D2004.11.15.xx.xx.xx), now. No change. Next I thought it could

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Dave Airlie
> > > There are at least 2 other features : > - pixel shaders (ATI_fragment_shader). It's R200 only. And I typically started this and then failed miserably to keep my momentum :-), but my second machine (laptop is out at the moment, when I get it repaired, spare parts in post, I can go back to hac

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Dieter Nützel wrote: Hmmm. It works, but there is a bit that we'll probably leave aside on the R200 (hierarchical Z) because neither Roland nor me have an R200. What do you need (apart from the hardware, at the moment ;-)? Basically, the problem is that hierarchical z stores z values using 8 bits.

Re: [r200] Latest Mesa CVS brake quake3 (-smp)

2004-12-02 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 1. Dezember 2004 21:00 schrieb Dieter NÃtzel: > Only empty/black window. > > Not r100-readpixels-3.patch or hyperz related. > > When I find time (tomorrow) I'll go back and see when it changed. I'm 17 days back (D2004.11.15.xx.xx.xx), now. No change. Next I thought it could be TLS re

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 2. Dezember 2004 19:54 schrieb Stephane Marchesin: > Jacek Popławski wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:49:56AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>>Radeon 9000 PCI > >>>Radeon 9200se AGP > >> > >>these two chips are already fully supported by xorg and the DRI. > > > >Fully? Was HyperZ

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Brian Paul wrote: We probably need Mesa driver hooks for BeginQuery() and EndQuery(). I could implement that pretty quickly. Let me know. Well, I have that done already. My current problems are : - fix the "XXX revisit when we have a hardware implementation!". i.e. how to get the query status

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Brian Paul
Stephane Marchesin wrote: Jacek Popławski wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:49:56AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: Radeon 9000 PCI Radeon 9200se AGP these two chips are already fully supported by xorg and the DRI. Fully? Was HyperZ only missing feature? There are at least 2 other features : - pixel sha

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Stephane Marchesin
Jacek Popławski wrote: On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:49:56AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: Radeon 9000 PCI Radeon 9200se AGP these two chips are already fully supported by xorg and the DRI. Fully? Was HyperZ only missing feature? There are at least 2 other features : - pixel shaders (ATI_fragment_shad

[Bug 1794] Xorg lockup with i810 and kernel gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.9

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1794 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-02 08:07 --- *Sigh* I give

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Jacek Popławski
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:49:56AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > > Radeon 9000 PCI > > Radeon 9200se AGP > > these two chips are already fully supported by xorg and the DRI. Fully? Was HyperZ only missing feature? And is HyperZ fully working now? -- Free Software - find interesting programs an

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:15:12 +, Jacek PopÅawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:49:56AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > Radeon 9000 PCI > > > Radeon 9200se AGP > > > > these two chips are already fully supported by xorg and the DRI. > > Fully? Was HyperZ only missing fe

Re: VIA command verifier.

2004-12-02 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi. > On Maw, 2004-11-30 at 20:09, Thomas Hellström wrote: >> Textures in AGP memory is currently not allowed, but they are disabled >> in the Mesa driver as well, for some reason. If they are allowed in the >> future, Texture address checks probably have to be implemented but that >> should be a

Re: Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:33:44 +1000, Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am interested in helping in getting DRI working with different ATI > chipsets. I have at my disposal the following. > > Radeon 9000 PCI > Radeon 9200se AGP these two chips are already fully supported by xorg and

Reverse engineering ati driver

2004-12-02 Thread Chris Ison
I am interested in helping in getting DRI working with different ATI chipsets. I have at my disposal the following.   Radeon 9000 PCI Radeon 9200se AGP Radeon 9600XT   If someone can inform me as to how I would go about reverse engineering the windows drivers, I could write small programs to

[Bug 1678] Direct Rendering problems on IGP 320M

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-02 03:01 --- Created an att

[Bug 1678] Direct Rendering problems on IGP 320M

2004-12-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added ---