Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or if it removes certain lockups you are
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers, and report if there are any
regressions (I don't believe there are any) and/or if it removes
certain lockups you are
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
and/or if it
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
Adam,
Great, thank you very much ! No, the system did not need to be actively
swapping in fact this would probably have confused the results. (this is
why I asked for passive apps)
Could you also let me know the following information:
Output of free
At the
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
I did some figuring on the CB_DPATH problem.
After little testing it turns out that the lock up with
progs/demos/isosurf goes away when the pacifier sequences are applied to
clearbuffer.
Im starting to think that this sequence is needed whenever overwriting
certain states
On 6/2/05, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried the patch on my x800 (0x554F), but no luck here either; hangs
nicely. I haven't tried fglrx yet.
well I got fglrx 8.12.10 up and running last night (had to install FC3 no
idea why it didn't like ubuntu.)
hmmm... I guess I
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't believe there are any)
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Aapo Tahkola wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
On 6/1/05, Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
What you can do: Please, test the attached
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers,
and report if there are any regressions (I don't
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:23:34 -0400
Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing... No matter what patches I apply, or what other X
programs and X clients I have running, I've never been able to get more
than 3-4 minutes out of UnrealTournament. I was able to play Q3A for an
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3408
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3460
Summary: dri-20050601 [r200] americas army crash after start
You guys seem to be getting closer...
When I had X + xfce4 + quake3 running (with this patch +
patch.drm-cmdbuf-more-pacifiers + patch.remove-userspace-pacifiers) X
locked up within 2 minutes.
However, X + quake3 (no window manager), I went thirty minutes before
my first problem.
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 08:56 -0400 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On 6/2/05, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried the patch on my x800 (0x554F), but no luck here either; hangs
nicely. I haven't tried fglrx yet.
well I got fglrx 8.12.10 up and running last night (had to
14 matches
Mail list logo
