I know it's quite silly to reply to own posts
I don't know if this problem:
3. Second dri problem: glxinfo says $ glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x24
libGL warning: 3D driver
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Dave's patch removes the entry for the card with the 0x5b60.
According to his bug report, Mauro has a Radeon X300SE that should
have the 0x5b70 according to pci.ids from pciutils
No. Look closer:
04:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI
On 2/13/06, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id
is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370.
It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too lazy to actually
see if the other entries that claim to be RV350's
Michał Pytasz wrote:
was gentoo-specific
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122140 , however it seems fixed now
(with new ebuild for xorg).
Indeed it wasn't Gentoo-specific at all, we just fixed it in our
packages. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835.
Thanks,
Donnie
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So I decided to just remove it. Even if there is some other bug that could
make it work again, we can always just re-add it at that time. In the
meantime, this should fix both DaveJs and Mauros problems, and is clearly
no worse than 2.6.15
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-13 09:20]:
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:25 +0100, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-02-12 13:39]:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-10 18:12]:
Here's a 3rd set of patches. Please report regressions ASAP as I intend
to merge those in the various
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
All seems good. No regressions on my Radeon Mobility M6 LY and Radeon
64MB DDR (7200). VT switch problems from #2 now fixed. Radeon 9800 Pro
still locks up with 3D, but that's not a regression.
I just had some trouble with VT switching -- when switching back to X, I
lost
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
Btw, the fact that Mauro has the same exact PCI ID (well, lspci stupidly
suppresses the ID entirely, but the string seems to match the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:42:09PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
DaveA, I'll apply this for now. Comments?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:50:52AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
...
I just worry whether (a) the other added PCI ID's are any good for that
core and (b) whether the bug was really introduced with some of the other
changes. I admit that (b) is pretty unlikely, but it would be good to
test.
Hi Donnie!
Monday 13, at 11:53:35 AM you wrote:
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
All seems good. No regressions on my Radeon Mobility M6 LY and Radeon
64MB DDR (7200). VT switch problems from #2 now fixed. Radeon 9800 Pro
still locks up with 3D, but that's not a regression.
I just had some
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-13 09:20]:
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:25 +0100, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-02-12 13:39]:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-10 18:12]:
Here's a 3rd set of patches. Please report regressions ASAP as I intend
to merge those in the various
Current DRM CVS HEAD doesn't work for me. However it does work with a
small patch applied:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5450#c3
Does it make sense to test that DRM code with the new X patch?
You mean the DRM without my old patch doesn't work ? What was the
symptom ? lockups
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:53 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
All seems good. No regressions on my Radeon Mobility M6 LY and Radeon
64MB DDR (7200). VT switch problems from #2 now fixed. Radeon 9800 Pro
still locks up with 3D, but that's not a regression.
I just had
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5883
Summary: Unable to reserve mem region on $modprobe r128 (Open
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-14 09:37]:
Current DRM CVS HEAD doesn't work for me. However it does work with a
small patch applied:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5450#c3
Does it make sense to test that DRM code with the new X patch?
You mean the DRM without my old
Can you try all combinations of my old patch, new patch, X patch !X
patch and let me know what the results are ?
If it's perfectly stable with your latest patch and without that one bad
Mesa patch, would that convince you it's not a bug in DRM/DDX? :)
Well, I'm navigating between lots
On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id
is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370.
It definitely is an RV370, you're right in that. I'm too lazy to
Am Montag, den 13.02.2006, 16:27 -0700 schrieb Jesse Allen:
On 2/13/06, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The one thing I have not yet been proven wrong for is that this PCI id
is the only one we have in this driver for an RV370.
It
21 matches
Mail list logo
