Re: drm: Branch 'vblank-rework'

2007-06-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: diff --git a/linux-core/drm_irq.c b/linux-core/drm_irq.c index f229f77..8125b75 100644 --- a/linux-core/drm_irq.c +++ b/linux-core/drm_irq.c @@ -77,6 +77,70 @@ int drm_irq_by_busid(struct inode *inode return 0; } +int

Re: [RFC] update DRM core vblank code to be more power friendly

2007-06-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 22:43 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 08:59:23AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Monday, June 11, 2007 11:36:10 Keith Packard wrote: ick. just read the registers and return the value here. We

Re: [RFC] update DRM core vblank code to be more power friendly

2007-06-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:35 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: [...] like Michel said, if only one pipe's vblank is enabled, only the primary vblank counter should be updated (regardless of *which* vblank count is enabled). But maybe that can be done at a higher level, or maybe we can change

Re: r300 texture rendering corruption

2007-06-13 Thread Mikko Rauhala
ke, 2007-06-13 kello 00:22 +, Oliver McFadden kirjoitti: This looks like DTX or S3TC texture compression (which is partially broken); I think there should be some more information on this on the list, and how to disable it. Oopsie. As said, I did try the ut2k4 options, but didn't think of

Re: drm: Branch 'vblank-rework'

2007-06-13 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12:24:05 Michel Dänzer wrote: On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: diff --git a/linux-core/drm_irq.c b/linux-core/drm_irq.c index f229f77..8125b75 100644 --- a/linux-core/drm_irq.c +++ b/linux-core/drm_irq.c @@ -77,6 +77,70 @@ int

Re: drm: Branch 'vblank-rework'

2007-06-13 Thread Jesse Barnes
+ if (temp VSYNC_PIPEA_FLAG) + atomic_add(i915_get_vblank_counter(dev, 0), +dev-vblank_count[0]); + if (temp VSYNC_PIPEB_FLAG) + atomic_add(i915_get_vblank_counter(dev, 1), +dev-vblank_count[1]); I think atomic_add is

Merging DRI changes

2007-06-13 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
Hi, I've finished the changes to the DRI interface that I've been talking about for a while (see #5714). Ian had a look at the DRI driver side of things, and ACK'ed those changes. I've done the X server changes now plus a couple of GLX module cleanups, and I think it's all ready to push:

[Bug 11250] drm mach64 module loading problem

2007-06-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11250 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-13 16:36 PST --- *** Bug 11251 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Bug 11250] drm mach64 module loading problem

2007-06-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11250 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-13 16:37 PST --- *** Bug 11252 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

Re: pulling over ttm interface changes

2007-06-13 Thread Dave Airlie
cheers, Kristian Kristian, This is OK with me. It will add an extra malloc / free for every buffer object creation / destruction, but will make it easier to maintain in the future, (and we can get rid of the padding for future expansion). Exactly, I took out the pad fields in