http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14733
Roland Scheidegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Drivers/DRI/i915|Mesa core
---
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9199
Michael Fu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14696
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-29 10:57:05
PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > Created an attachment (id=14639)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14639) [detai
Sorry, mouse went wonky for a second there.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Johannes Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What did you want to say, Alex? I only got the quotes. ;)
>
> Greetings, Johannes
>
-
This SF.net email
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Hellström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:08:53 +0100
> > Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> 2) Relocation application. KeithPs presumed_offset stuff has to a great
> >> extent fixed th
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, seventh guardian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Hellström
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've pushed the intel-post-reloc branch with the following stuff:
> >
> > 1) Full backwards compatibility.
> > 2) A
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Hellström
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've pushed the intel-post-reloc branch with the following stuff:
>
> 1) Full backwards compatibility.
> 2) A new reloc type 1, which is applied _after_ all validations and with
> slightly different format.
>
Hi.
I've pushed the intel-post-reloc branch with the following stuff:
1) Full backwards compatibility.
2) A new reloc type 1, which is applied _after_ all validations and with
slightly different format.
3) If the buffer is idle, type 1 relocations are performed using the new
kmap_atomic_prot_pf
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:08:53 +0100
Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2) Relocation application. KeithPs presumed_offset stuff has to a great
> extent fixed this problem. I think the kmap_atomic_prot_pfn() stuff just
> added will take care of the rest, and I hope the mm kernel guys
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:46:48 +0100
> Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks.
>> Added Jerome's flush-bit-in-sequence-blit suggestion and a section about
>> the command_stream_barrier() callback, which might be handy also for
>> Radeons.
>>
>> /Thomas
>
Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:08:53 +0100
> Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> 2) Relocation application. KeithPs presumed_offset stuff has to a great
>> extent fixed this problem. I think the kmap_atomic_prot_pfn() stuff just
>> added will take care of the rest
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:46:48 +0100
Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks.
> Added Jerome's flush-bit-in-sequence-blit suggestion and a section about
> the command_stream_barrier() callback, which might be handy also for
> Radeons.
>
> /Thomas
>
Thomas i got one last question to
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>> Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 06:08 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>>
> I wasn't planning on a Mesa 7.1 (trunk code) release for a while, but I
> could finish up 7.0.3
Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Thomas Hellström
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Thomas Hellström
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> >> > Hi Thomas,
>> >> >
>> >> > As i a
14 matches
Mail list logo
