On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:58, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Can someone out there check this quickly?
In radeon.h in the 2d driver, the size of the radeon mmio area is defined as
0x8 - however, on my r200 at least, /proc/pci shows the area as being
1/8th that size:
Bus 1, device 0,
VE QY
The VE is the exact same as the 7000. I might need to locate a machine
with a supported agp gart, though...
I'll test it sometime this week (probably tomorrow).
-Al Tobey
--
Tim Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If I slay everone, I am bound to get the ones I am mad at!
-- Groo
Might want to post this on the site somewhere - appears that utah-glx
has posted specs for some SiS chipsets (300 630).
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/utah-glx/300ds03.pdf?download
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/utah-glx/630ds10a.pdf?download
-Al
of your system ;)
-Al Tobey
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed. If you have received this
email in error please
of
code to get working (use libjpeg). I don't forsee a big problem
performance wise if the textures are mangled during the loading stage,
but I'm still learning ...
I'll poke around in Mesa for myself this weekend, if there's time.
-Al Tobey
textures. Of
course, people without enough memory to chew through this stuff quickly
would not want this turned on.
-Al
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 12:42, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:42:22AM -0400, Al Tobey wrote:
Here's the idea: would it be beneficial to convert a texture to a
low
Ok. I didn't understand the format that the card was expecting. A
large misunderstanding on my part. Thank you for clearing that up.
-Al
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 14:07, Ian Romanick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 01:31:59PM -0400, Al Tobey wrote:
So, I'm guessing that textures aren't loaded
, and they
seem to be. Also, I did 'mv /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules.old' and did another 'make install' of the tree.
This didn't change anything, either.
-Al
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 03:38, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michael wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 08:43:44PM -0400, Al Tobey wrote
Hello,
Just pulled built the tcl branch fresh this morning and it locks my
SMP machine up hard when X starts, but before any applications get a
chance to. Log config is attached. The following text is output from
strace -fp `ps -ef |awk '/[X] :0/{print $2}'`
--- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) ---
Since it seems to be my turn to spam the list...
Has anybody talked to SiS about this beastie (Xabre) yet? It's brand
new and I can't even find a card for sale, but there are a few reviews
floating about the net. Might be nice to get a decent card supported in
DRI before it hits EOL ;)
-Al
Same thing with a UP kernel ...
Yes, the kernel module was built fresh from the CVS tree.
Should this not be happening?
Does it have something to do with the 7000/VE not having a TCL unit?
Am I an idiot for trying to use the TCL driver on a non-TCL card?
-Al
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 19:18, Al
. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious
before starting down that path.
HP OmniBook 6100
Intel Pentium III Mobile 1133Mhz
/proc/cpuinfo and dmesg dmesg.txt are attached.
-Al
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 21:59, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On 28 May 2002, Al Tobey wrote:
If I
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 09:06, Jacek Popawski wrote:
So: If ATI want to sell more 8500 - it should help fix 3dfx driver.
What I was saying is if you want specs for the 8500 to develop the
driver for it, you need to have a track record. Fixing the 3dfx driver
is a good way to show that you have
I think that I'll remove from the FAQ the direct links for the specs
requesting forms of ATI and others vendors - its existence can give the impression
that they are easily obtainable - which is not true. As you said, if we pest too
much we are killing the golden egg chicken and we must
Here's a stupid question:
Are there any cards on the market, which don't already have DRI
drivers, that have publicly available specs? I'll do some searching - a
card or two in this category would make a great training ground for some
new developers.
-Al Tobey
, José Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.05.24 19:49 Al Tobey wrote:
Here's a stupid question:
Are there any cards on the market, which don't already have DRI
drivers, that have publicly available specs? I'll do some searching - a
card or two in this category would make a great training ground
/3DLabs thinks about releasing their new chip this fall.
-Al Tobey
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 18:24, Mike Westall wrote:
Once upon a time 3DLabs gave us the specs
for Glint TX, Permedia 2, and Permedia 3
cards. We did Utah - like accelerated 3D drivers
for X 3.3.6 for the Glint TX and Permedia 2
I read some of the stuff about Longhorn (it's cheese!) - looks like M$
wants to do make all 2d operations into texture operations in 3d mode.
No more 2d/3d mode switching issues.
http://www.tomshardware.com/business/02q2/020417/winhec11-05.html
My thought is that X could do this without
18 matches
Mail list logo
