On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 08:44:48AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Fr, 10 Sep 2010, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > FWIW, 2.6.36-rc3-00396-gbe6200a suspend-to-ram works for me on GM45
>
> I never said that it has anything to do with suspend to ram.
Ah, sorry for misunderstanding. My
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:41:17AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> running: 2.6.36-rc3+ (from git) on Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) GM45
> (Sony Vaio Z11)
> Debian/unstable, so xserver 1.7.7, intel driver: 2.12.0
>
> since some recent kernel I have the following problem: When closing the
My x201s (Core i7 L640 according to /proc/cpuinfo) running -rc1 exhibits
cursor corruption when changing the cursor image (such as when moving
out of xterm onto the desktop). Bisection pointed to 9b8c4a0b215e and
reverting that on top of 03cd373981 fixed the problem. I'm running
fvwm2 with xterm
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:18:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> (II) NOUVEAU(0): [drm] nouveau interface version: 0.0.16
> (EE) NOUVEAU(0): [drm] wrong version, expecting 0.0.15
> (EE) NOUVEAU(0): 879:
So I've tried reading the thread and haven't found the answer to this
questi
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:28:37PM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 ("idr: fix a critical
> misallocation bug") causes Xorg to segfault with the following
> backtrace:
>
> ...
> (II) intel(0): Initializing HW Cursor
> (II)
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:11:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 02/04/2010 10:28 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 ("idr: fix a critical
> > misallocation bug") causes Xorg to segfault with the following
> > backtrace:
>
&
On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 ("idr: fix a critical
misallocation bug") causes Xorg to segfault with the following
backtrace:
...
(II) intel(0): Initializing HW Cursor
(II) intel(0): No memory allocations
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X11/X(xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x4f00c6]
1: /usr/bin/X11/X
[responding from my personal account to avoid the subscriber-only filter]
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:40:28PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > [perhaps DRI / fd.o should consider BitKeeper]
>
> For DRI at least, it's been discussed & rejected.
My a
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:29:05PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> Stablizing the tree and getting something shipping that people can
> distribute is the first priority. I'm sure lots of people would like to
> see Mesa/DRI development more closely tied to X driver development so that
> there wasn
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:40:25AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> bk clone bk://mesa3d.bkbits.net/drm
> ERROR-Lock fail: possible permission problem.
Oops.
OK, fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.
(In the future, please let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know of such problems.)
-andy
-
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:41:54AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:27:28PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 08:22, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > "unsigned long" is semi-unspecified, but is reasonably assumed to be
> > > a 32-bit quantity.
> >
> > On all 64bit bi
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:44:51PM +0100, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > What about support for other architectures, in particular PPC?
>
> The Apple as the #1 PPC platform (okay there might be several others)
> does have an AGP slot and to my knowledge there is a nice ATI history
> for the MacOS. Not
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 07:54:11AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:10:01PM -0400, Mike Westall wrote:
> >>The attached program illustrates a shading anomaly
> >>we have encountered while attempting to use autonormal
&g
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:10:01PM -0400, Mike Westall wrote:
> The attached program illustrates a shading anomaly
> we have encountered while attempting to use autonormal
> in conjunction with nurbs.
>
> The shading of the sphere is seriously screwed up
> while running with indirect renderin
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 11:48:40AM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > The problem is that stock gdb doesn't know about XFree86 modules. There
> > are patched versions of gdb for that, but even so you can get more
> > information by calling the LoaderPrintSymbol function for each of the
> > addre
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:17:34PM -0400, Karl Lessard wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> this patch fixes some problems in texturing in the mga driver.
>
> 1) It fixes a texture corruption problem, as the mga driver did not use
> the right texture format in some case
> ( I've seen that when an a
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:00:45AM +, Bobakitoo wrote:
> hi,
> Where do i get linux drm v3.0.?
> dri as in xfree4.1.0 dont like drm in linux 2.4.5.
> Is it the lates kernel... how can you all work on code
> not yet aviable(until is somme where else)
>
> "[dri] mga.o kernel module versio
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:56:15AM -0500, Michael Ledet wrote:
> I'm having problems with lockups while using dri with the mga driver. I
> can easily reproduce the problems by doing any of the following:
[snip]
> In all cases I get the following message in syslog
>
>kernel: [drm:mga_fire_pri
My development machine tracks debian unstable pretty closely (apt-get
update && apt-get -u upgrade every few days), and recently when I had a
chance to grab the latest DRI tree and built it, I had client programs
failing to start with
straum% gears
gears: error while loading shared libraries: /da
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:32:07AM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > Speaking of which, I've been thinking about ordering Tribes2 and was
> > wondering if there are any issues that we should be aware of?
>
> Go and buy this game. It rocks. Loki has done a great job, and
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 04:26:00PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Would it be better if the DRI User Guide were divided into a number of
> separate HTML pages, instead of one long document? I could do that
> with the sgml2html converter. I'm hesitant to create new documents
> because that's more wor
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 09:42:46AM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:09:46AM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:48:10PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > > Does the DRI project offer CVSUp access?
> > It doesn't, but I&#
Does the DRI project offer CVSUp access? I'm collecting CVS trees in
the interest of being able to do speedy local CVS operations, and CVSUp
is the most efficient method of getting the repository.
It would appear that the answer is no --
- there is no host cvsup.dri.sourceforge.net
- cvs.dri.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:10:00PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is still anyone using Linux 2.3.x ?
>
> There's a bit of cruft still left in the drm kernel modules regarding
> support for 2.3.x kernels and wondering whether I can remove this stuff.
I say kill it. The ex
24 matches
Mail list logo
