Brian Paul wrote:
> Off hand, I don't recall which DRI-supported cards/chips have stereo
> ability. Stereo has traditionally been a "professional card" feature
> for sci-vis apps.
>
> In any case, none of the DRI drivers support quad-buffer stereo at this
> time.
There are patches around for
Daniel Kasak wrote:
I see. Sincere apologies. I've been using Gentoo's cvs ebuilds, but
admittedly I wasn't sure where they were pulling stuff from. I'll have a
closer look, and either hack one up to get from cvs head, or do it manually.
Gentoo doesn't supply CVS ebuilds for anything X, last I
Felix Kühling wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 14.03.2006, 18:59 -0800 schrieb Mike Mestnik:
>> Great!
>> Any reason why prelink complains about non-PIC libGL? I think you need
>> to add -fPIC somewhere.
>
> That's not my fault. I use the build system pretty much from up-stream.
> There are reasons why
Patrick McFarland wrote:
> glxcmds.c: In function ‘glXBindTexImageEXT’:
> glxcmds.c:2618: error: ‘X_GLXvop_BindTexImageEXT’ undeclared (first use in
> this function)
Guess you haven't been reading the list lately. Update your glproto.
xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/proto/.
signature.
Patrick McFarland wrote:
> I'll tell you soon as I can figure out why Mesa thinks I don't have stdarg.h
> and stddef.h. I imagine this is going to require pounding Mesa with a hammer
> until it quits being stupid.
You can ignore those errors, it's just makedepend being stupid and not
looking in
Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> All seems good. No regressions on my Radeon Mobility M6 LY and Radeon
> 64MB DDR (7200). VT switch problems from #2 now fixed. Radeon 9800 Pro
> still locks up with 3D, but that's not a regression.
I just had some trouble with VT switching -- when switching back to X, I
los
Michał Pytasz wrote:
> was gentoo-specific
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122140 , however it seems fixed now
> (with new ebuild for xorg).
Indeed it wasn't Gentoo-specific at all, we just fixed it in our
packages. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835.
Thanks,
Donnie
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-02-12 13:39]:
>> Benjamin Herrenschmidt [2006-02-10 18:12]:
>>> Here's a 3rd set of patches. Please report regressions ASAP as I intend
>>> to merge those in the various CVS trees real soon now.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Also, I fixed a potential issue
Felix Kühling wrote:
> Getting snapshots from the modular tree to work will probably require
> that a modular Xorg is installed somewhere on the build machine. I may
> get away with installing a modular Xorg on the build machine in some
> dummy location that doesn't interfere with the Xorg 6.8 inst
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> For the past day or two I've been getting the following error when trying to
> compile DRI from Mesa CVS:
>
> gcc -c -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include/GL/internal
> -I../../../src/mesa/main -I../../../src/mesa/glapi
> -I../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common `pkg
Felix Kühling wrote:
> Yeah, but these are exactly the hard cases that are most confusing to
> users and that I'm trying to solve. Also some executables don't have
> very descriptive names, like "fgfs" for FlightGear. It's also impossible
> to sort auto-detected applications into meaningful categor
Felix Kühling wrote:
> for the next version of DRIconf I'm working on a database of known
> applications that can be selected from a menu. This way users won't need
> to go through the confusion of finding out the correct executable name
> any more. However, the range of applications and games I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michał Pytasz wrote:
| viaLowLevel.c: In function `viaDMAInitTimeStamp':
| viaLowLevel.c:288: error: `VIDEO' undeclared (first use in this function)
| viaLowLevel.c:288: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
| viaLowLevel.c:288: err
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pedro.lixo wrote:
| Your Xorg version, is patched with a known patch(at least by me, it's
from Mike A. Harris). Are you using gentoo!?
|
| Gentoo has this patch, probably also Red Hat and Fedora Core.
|
| With that patch, you cannot override. In gento
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Dodge wrote:
| libGL error: dlopen .../r300_dri.so failed (.../r300_dri.so:
undefined symbol: _glapi_add_dispatch)
Hmm.. you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH pointing to a libGL from CVS, right?
That's the problem I had, but it sounds like everything el
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
| Philipp Klaus Krause schrieb:
|
|>What happened to this one?
|>I found some discussion about it in the mailing list archive,
|>but I didn't find it in the wiki.
|>
|>Philipp
|
|
| OK I found it at
| http://dri.sourceforge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Smirl wrote:
> From what I can tell vesafb use is pretty rare. A while ago I broke
> things in DRM CVS so that vesafb wouldn't work, it was about two
> months until we got a complaint. DRM CVS is fixed for vesafb but the
> long lag indicates that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I extracted this patch by Egbert Eich from SuSe's kernel
> source package:
>
> http://www.develer.com/drm-ioctl32.patch
>
> It allows running 32bit DRI clients on 64bit systems,
> which is a very common situat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> I tagged yesterday "the_perfect_frag" snapshot of R300 driver.
>
> The code is in CVS at http://r300.sf.net
>
> As the name suggests I cannot find visible faults with rendering
> Quake3 levels. Also, PPRace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> Can someone enlighten me as to what is the license of R200 Mesa
> driver ? Also, what is the usual (accepted, preferred, etc..) license
> for a Mesa driver code ?
Taken a look at the top of any the files in src/mesa/dri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Heldens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't run the game legends ( Torque Game Engine,
> http://happypenguin.org/show?Legends&start=20 ) it segfaults when hitting the
> ground after spawning.
> Xorg 6.8.2 , card RV250, linux 2.6.10, legends 0.4.1b, gcc 3.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> Makes me wish I had a PPC box alongside the x86 one.
You might like to try http://pearpc.sourceforge.net/.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCNgGnXVaO67S1rtsRAuQ+AKCSkimy2poypyjls7ihX2bgtU6C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hamie wrote:
| 1. Gentoo seems to install the libs & dri modules for X in
| /usr/lib/modules/dri instead of under /usr/X11R6
Sure, but if you don't have a broken install, /usr/X11R6 symlinks to
/usr so you won't notice. The usual problem is more like in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away in
> a
> direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode
> network.
>
> Tor ( http://tor.eff.org ) is an open source anon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
| On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:
|> Will version 6.8.1.902 (from Gentoo) be recent enough?
|
|
| I don't think so - this sounds like 6.8.2-rc1
Actually RC2 -- it's how the numbering scheme works. (version-1).90X i
On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 04:06 +0100, Sérgio wrote:
> Can we change configuration of Xorg, for compile and install xorg
> without compile any source of Mesa and/or GLx ?
You could try BuildGLXLibrary and/or BuildXF86DRI. I'm not sure of all
the implications, but it sounds like the right direction.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 05:04, khaqq wrote:
> you may have beta-testers / developpers on #gentoo-sparc
> on freenode... people there have that kind of hardware.
> just my 2 cents, of course.
Ferris McCormick (fmccor) in that channel definitely has the hardware --
not sure who else. I know he's gotte
ug.cgi?id=1513, so older than
that.
--
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gi
o.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/x11-base/opengl-update/files/opengl-update-1.8.1?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain
--
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
cases it works
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65348).
--
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Dave Airlie wrote:
It's one of the major successes I feel of the DRI project, those
snapshots allowed people with Radeon IGP chipsets to get 3d acceleration
long before now (they still can't get it any current distro)
Not quite right -- Gentoo has xorg 6.7.99.x snapshots.
Donnie
---
quot; Any opposition to doing so?
I'd rather also see huge logs. But that's just me.
--
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nse (nearly
identical to the problematic one), was in at that point.
--
Donnie Berkholz
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Owen Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have just switched to Gentoo Linux (2.4.20 Kernel)
> and I have downloaded a dripkg installation install.sh
> script. Unfortunately trying to install provides me
> with the following listing in the dri.log. I have
> emerged xfree-drm but
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 05:28, Louis Garcia wrote:
> I've been playing with kernel-2.6 on redhat's latest beta. With my
> radeon 7500 drm works great. When I boot to kernel-2.6 latest, I
> modprobeagpgart, intel-agp and radeon. Startx and run glxinfo
> and glxgears and both segfault. Anyone else seei
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 19:12, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:46:44PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know for the proprietary drivers (supplied by ATI and
> > Nvidia) which pieces they replace and which pieces they expect to be
> > there? The reason I'm asking is to
36 matches
Mail list logo
