release of X.org and the next. Would
that help you?
Yes, sure.
Thomas
--
Thomas Winischhofer
Vienna/Austria
thomas AT winischhofer DOT net *** http://www.winischhofer.net
twini AT xfree86 DOT org
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The
Jens Owen wrote:
Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Would you DRI guys mind adding a #define for DRI_VERSION_CURRENT in
the same style as XORG_VERSION_CURRENT so that changes like the types
from drmHandle -> drm_handle_t can be handled smoothly with the C
preprocessor for older versions?
Point be
m this (and
3D, of course), these chips should be well supported by the current SiS
driver (well, as soon as I get the PCI IDs)
Thomas
--
Thomas Winischhofer
Vienna/Austria
thomas AT winischhofer DOT net http://www.winischhofer.net/
twini AT xfree86 DOT org
---
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> >
> > Jens Owen wrote:
> > > > So far, nobody could explain to me what direction the current
> > > > development is going which makes it necessary to update the SiS driver
> > > > in a
le from using it
As soon as I have time, I will take a look. From the last time I read
the code, I remember it was quite well documented (or spoke for itself).
Thomas
--
Thomas Winischhofer
Vienna/Austria
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** http://www.winischhofer.net
_
quot;
information out of them doesn't look promising. Either they do it
themselves, or nobody does it. They did not agree to give me any docs,
even after I had offered to sign a NDA.)
> However, Thomas Winischhofer has been working hard to keep SiS support
> going wherever possible, and it *
