"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> >> >It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
> >> >
> >> >For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
> >> >dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what hardware
>
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>> >It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
>> >
>> >For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
>> >dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what hardware
>> >it is running on and passes that to t
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
>
>For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
>dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what hardware
>it is running on and passes that to the client (via
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Philip Willoughby wrote:
>>Any pre-existing code out there to solve this problem? I don't
>>have any 3dfx cards to test with at all, so any help getting a
>>solution happening would be great.
>>
>>Thoughts/comments/suggestions, etc.?
>
>What I would do, as a quick-and-dirty h
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Jon Niehof wrote:
>> For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
>> dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what
>> hardware it is running on and passes that to the client (via the PCI
>> id). If you did this, you could also change the
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Adam K Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Mike A. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: dri-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Determining the prop
> For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
> dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what
> hardware it is running on and passes that to the client (via the PCI
> id). If you did this, you could also change the X tree to include the
> appropriate glide.h
Today, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>I'd like opinions on what would be the best way of determining at
>runtime what glide library to use? The current problem is that
>there are 2 Glide libraries for Glide3 - one for Voodoo 3, and
>another for Voodoo 5. This is inconvenient to say the least.
>
>Curren
Why is this a problem? How many people out there are swapping back and
forth between a V3 and V5 on the same machine and need to change symlinks?
Adam
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> I'd like opinions on what would be the best way of determining at
> runtime what glide library to
