Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-07-01 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:37:59AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: >José Fonseca wrote: [...] >> >>Indeed! Here are the results of the 'b' and 'B' benchmark with the >>default settings before: >> >>Benchmarking... >>Result: triangles/sec: 205098 fps: 28.5771 >>Benchmarking... >>Result: triangles/s

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-07-01 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 07:34:31AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >> José Fonseca wrote: >> >>> Preliminary support Mach64 native vertex buffer template was added to >>> CVS. The measures on the increase of performance in doing this are >>> rather marginal unfortunately: I g

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-07-01 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 07:34:31AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: >José Fonseca wrote: >>Preliminary support Mach64 native vertex buffer template was added to >>CVS. The measures on the increase of performance in doing this are >>rather marginal unfortunately: I got an increase of 800 poly/sec (over

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-06-30 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: > Preliminary support Mach64 native vertex buffer template was added to > CVS. The measures on the increase of performance in doing this are > rather marginal unfortunately: I got an increase of 800 poly/sec (over > 35400) on ipers mesademo on the previous mach64-0-0-4-branch,

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-06-30 Thread Keith Whitwell
José Fonseca wrote: > Preliminary support Mach64 native vertex buffer template was added to > CVS. The measures on the increase of performance in doing this are > rather marginal unfortunately: I got an increase of 800 poly/sec (over > 35400) on ipers mesademo on the previous mach64-0-0-4-branch,

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-06-30 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 23:56, José Fonseca wrote: > > This is still disabled by default since some things are still missing. > One of them is support for bigendian architectures, and therefore a > doubt that I came about: is it necessary to swap bytes when writting a > IEEE fp number on a bigendia

[Dri-devel] Mach64 native template & PPC fp format

2002-06-30 Thread José Fonseca
Preliminary support Mach64 native vertex buffer template was added to CVS. The measures on the increase of performance in doing this are rather marginal unfortunately: I got an increase of 800 poly/sec (over 35400) on ipers mesademo on the previous mach64-0-0-4-branch, but on the new branch the r