On Fri, 3 May 2002, Felix Kühling wrote:
However, when exiting the X server, I get a hard lockup. I haven't found
Maybe this is related: whenever the X-server exits I get the following
messages at the end of XFree86.1.log:
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11. Server aborting
So
On 2002.05.01 19:41 Frank C. Earl wrote:
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 03:58 am, JosX Fonseca wrote:
Frank just commited a set of changes to the mach64-0-0-3-dma-branch. Is
in
own words:
Most of the first cut of the DMA code. It's got most of the
dispatch
architecture in place
On Wed, 1 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
... or we
bring Frank's changes to mach64-0-0-4-branch. Personally I'm more in
favor
of the later, since it will avoid redundant work of merging back and
forward, and will also enable the PowerPC architecture to participate
in testing.
On Fri, 3 May 2002 04:01:42 -0400 (EDT)
Leif Delgass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my progress since I sent the first patch
of my merge. None of this is checked in yet, btw. I added the necessary
initialization to atidri.c, based on the glint/gamma driver, and
Frank just commited a set of changes to the mach64-0-0-3-dma-branch. Is in
own words:
Most of the first cut of the DMA code. It's got most of the
dispatch
architecture in place (Lacks actual DMA submission (The easy part,
really...))
so it's not done yet, but I promised people that
On Wed, 1 May 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
Frank just commited a set of changes to the mach64-0-0-3-dma-branch. Is in
own words:
Most of the first cut of the DMA code. It's got most of the
dispatch
architecture in place (Lacks actual DMA submission (The easy part,
really...))
so
On 2002.05.01 16:18 Leif Delgass wrote:
One thing I realized concerning blits:
the utah driver uses the host_data[0-15] registers to do blits which
treats blits as a GUI-master operation. This means it works with
pseudo-DMA. I think the better way to do it is to use the system bus
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 03:58 am, JosX Fonseca wrote:
Frank just commited a set of changes to the mach64-0-0-3-dma-branch. Is in
own words:
Most of the first cut of the DMA code. It's got most of the
dispatch
architecture in place (Lacks actual DMA submission (The easy part,
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Frank C. Earl wrote:
The part which is missing is more or less what we have in the
mach64-0-0-4-branch, except that the state update is still being made with
MMIO. So either we add the remaining parts to mach64-0-0-3-branch or we
bring Frank's changes to
