Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 15:42, Brian Paul wrote:
If direct rendering is not available, we use indirect rendering
(send GL drawing commands over the wire to the Xserver). The
Xserver in turn executes the GL commands.
Does that als
Brian Paul wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 15:42, Brian Paul wrote:
If direct rendering is not available, we use indirect rendering (send
GL drawing commands over the wire to the Xserver). The Xserver in
turn executes the GL commands.
Does that also include the case where clie
Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 15:42, Brian Paul wrote:
If direct rendering is not available, we use indirect rendering (send GL
drawing commands over the wire to the Xserver). The Xserver in turn executes
the GL commands.
So am I correct in thinking server side acceleration for old
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 15:42, Brian Paul wrote:
> If direct rendering is not available, we use indirect rendering (send GL
> drawing commands over the wire to the Xserver). The Xserver in turn executes
> the GL commands.
So am I correct in thinking server side acceleration for old hardware that
Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:45, Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
The good old Mesa-3.4.2 can be Voodoo Graphics enabled by having
it include the FX subdirectory, so why shouldn't it still work ?
Its possible to write a DRI driver layer for the Voodoo1/Voodoo
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 19:54, Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
Perhaps the dri-devel list isn't the right place to be, because
what I have in mind is indeed not a DRI driver, rather a modification
of the version of Mesa which DRI uses if there's no hardware-accelerated
DRI-driver availab
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 19:54, Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
> Perhaps the dri-devel list isn't the right place to be, because
> what I have in mind is indeed not a DRI driver, rather a modification
> of the version of Mesa which DRI uses if there's no hardware-accelerated
> DRI-driver available. But sti
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:45, Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
The good old Mesa-3.4.2 can be Voodoo Graphics enabled by having
it include the FX subdirectory, so why shouldn't it still work ?
Its possible to write a DRI driver layer for the Voodoo1/Voodoo2
X server. Nobody has done s
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 16:45, Erling A. Jacobsen wrote:
> The good old Mesa-3.4.2 can be Voodoo Graphics enabled by having
> it include the FX subdirectory, so why shouldn't it still work ?
Its possible to write a DRI driver layer for the Voodoo1/Voodoo2
X server. Nobody has done so and I can't see
even in spite of what the experts say:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1506938&forum_id=7177
I run Red Hat Linux 7.3, and have a Voodoo Graphics card.
I am prepared to fiddle with the sources myself, basically by
installing the sources from the SRPM, adding and changing th
10 matches
Mail list logo
