> Hey, has anyone had experience with Radeon VE for dri? I'm not
> interested in the extra heads particularly... VE 64mb starts at $57 on
> pricewatch, or with tv out for $65. It's faster than a Geforce2 MX400,
> and the linux drivers are open source... if they work. If anyone has
> experei
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Bobakitoo wrote:
>
> Radeon VE is verry diapointing. It propably the driver code and
> it may be get improved.
>
A quick look at any of the reviews for the Radeon VE will point out that
there is a very significant difference between the VE and other Radeons.
The VE is intend
Thanks for the information, it was very helpfull., I'm sorry If I
offended anyone by saying radeon is faster than Gf2 mx400, though it is
:-) You might want to research your hardware before you say something
like a radeon doesn't have T&L...
Carl Busjahn
Tim Keating wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Oct 2
Carl Busjahn wrote:
>
> Thanks for the information, it was very helpfull., I'm sorry If I
> offended anyone by saying radeon is faster than Gf2 mx400, though it is
> :-) You might want to research your hardware before you say something
> like a radeon doesn't have T&L...
You should do your own
From: Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:59:06 -0700
You should do your own research. The Radeon VE does not have T&L, and
neither does the laptop Radeon chip. Even if you had a Radeon variant
that does support T&L in hardware, that feature is not enabled
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> This is all well and good until someone figures out what knobs to
> change in the windows registry to turn the "hardware disabled" feature
> back on. Or what binary editing to make on the driver to forcefully
> turn T&L on for the VE chips.
>
> This
