On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:05:27PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote:
> > There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES*
> > ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even
> > if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture
> > yourself like that?!?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:33:56PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Philip Armstrong wrote:
> >phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo >./ut2003_demo
> >Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
> Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do
> full
> There is no way in hell UT2k3 will run on MGA. It *REQUIRES*
> ARB_texture_env_combine, which is not supported by that hardware. Even
> if it didn't require that extension, good grief man, why torture
> yourself like that?!? :)
FWIW, the Windows version of UT2003 even runs (badly) on Intel 810
Leif Delgass wrote:
Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't
supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner
registers, but it's not implemented in the driver yet (I don't have
hardware docs myself so I don't know the specifics of what the c
Philip Armstrong wrote:
phil@trigger /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo >./ut2003_demo
Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".
Ignore this. This is UT2k3 trying to determine which way to do
fullscreen. Either the XFree86 way or the XiG way.
[ 4] /usr/X11R6/lib/mo
> Based on the MESA_DEBUG log, It looks like ARB_texture_env_combine isn't
> supported in the MGA driver. I see defines for what look like combiner
That's a no go as we rely on this extension. The game should probably assert
in this case.
-- Daniel, Epic Games Inc.
---
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Daniel Vogel wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
> > > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 06:13:01PM -0500, Daniel Vogel wrote:
> > > > [ 6] /usr/X11R6/lib/modules-dri-trunk/dri/mga_dri.so [0x43f31fb7]
> > > > [ 7] /scratch/phil/ut2k3/demo/System/OpenGLDrv.so(DrawPrimitive__
> > > > 22FOpenGLRenderInterface14EPrimitiveType+0x373)
>
> Might be interesting t
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:53:25PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:25:16PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
> > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which
> > is purported to n
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
> > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which
> > > is purported to not need
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
> > > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v220
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
> > Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which
> > is purported to not need S3TC extensi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:12:04PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> Using the debs at http://people.debian.org/~daenzer/dri-trunk-sid/ on
> Debian unstable and the latest demo release of UT2003 (v2206 -- which
> is purported to not need S3TC extensions), I get the following
> traceback reported by
This is pretty much a followup to Adam Kirchhoff's bug report.
Adam reported that UT2003 patch level 2186 failed with the latest dri
trunk on his Radeon 8500 and gave the traceback reported by UT2003.
I've noticed that more information is contained within
~/.ut2003/System/UT2003.log
Using the deb
This is pretty much a followup to Adam Kirchhoff's bug report.
Adam reported that UT2003 patch level 2186 failed with the latest dri
trunk on his Radeon 8500 and gave the traceback reported by UT2003.
I've noticed that more information is contained within
~/.ut2003/System/UT2003.log
Using the deb
16 matches
Mail list logo
