Hi!
Here comes the via drm module patch against current (at least as of
today :-) CVS
(/usr/local/src/dri-cvs/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm)
What we've done is the following:
1. Base. Via:s drm Module 0038.
2. Added vblank_wait IOCTL support (Terry Barnaby), via_irq.c
Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi!
Here comes the via drm module patch against current (at least as of
today :-) CVS
(/usr/local/src/dri-cvs/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm)
What we've done is the following:
1. Base. Via:s drm Module 0038.
2. Added vblank_wait IOCTL support (T
Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Hi!
Here comes the via drm module patch against current (at least as of
today :-) CVS
(/usr/local/src/dri-cvs/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm)
What we've done is the following:
1. Base. Via:s drm Module 0038.
2. Added vblank_wait IOCTL support (T
> Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Here comes the via drm module patch against current (at least as of
>> today :-) CVS
>> (/usr/local/src/dri-cvs/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm)
>>
>>
>> What we've done is the following:
>> 1. Base. Via:s drm Module 0038.
>> 2. Added vb
> Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Here comes the via drm module patch against current (at least as of
>> today :-) CVS
>> (/usr/local/src/dri-cvs/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm)
>>
>>
>> What we've done is the following:
>> 1. Base. Via:s drm Module 0038.
>> 2. Added vb
--- Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Here comes the via drm module patch against current (at least as
> of
> >> today :-) CVS
> >>
>
(/usr/local/src/dri-cvs/xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm)
> >>
> >>
> >> What we've d
Alex Deucher wrote:
Hi!
I've now checked out the new cvs drm module and the via patch I sent
previously applies cleanly with
patch -p1
in drm/linux.
Also compiles cleanly under both 2.4 and 2.6
Is anyone averse to giving Thomas cvs commit access?
No. Let's pester Daniel again...
Keith
Around 18 o'clock on Mar 19, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Is anyone averse to giving Thomas cvs commit access?
>
> No. Let's pester Daniel again...
Did Thomas send preferred account names, an SSH key and the like? If not,
send them along and I'll create an account with dri group access. Daniel
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 17:06, Thomas HellstrÃm wrote:
>
> I've now checked out the new cvs drm module and the via patch I sent
> previously applies cleanly with
> patch -p1
> in drm/linux.
> Also compiles cleanly under both 2.4 and 2.6
Is there a reason for it to be Linux specific?
--
Earthling
Michel DÃnzer wrote:
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 17:06, Thomas HellstrÃm wrote:
I've now checked out the new cvs drm module and the via patch I sent
previously applies cleanly with
patch -p1
in drm/linux.
Also compiles cleanly under both 2.4 and 2.6
Is there a reason for it to
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 01:09, Thomas HellstrÃm wrote:
>
> What I do know is that the Vblank code and some soon-to-be mpeg2
> decoder lock code use linux wait queues, but I guess that should be
> quite easy to port,
Indeed, there are DRM_INIT_WAITQUEUE(), DRM_WAIT_ON() and friends for
that.
--
Thanks.
I'll read up on and get a feeling for CVS policies etc, do some cleaning
up and check in the stuff within a couple of days.
/Thomas
Keith Packard wrote:
Created 'unichrome' in group 'dri'. Have fun.
-keith
---
This SF.Net
12 matches
Mail list logo
