eesh.
>
> -Michael
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Hourihane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:56 AM
> To: Champigny, Michael
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def
>
>
> On
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:58:31AM -0400, Champigny, Michael wrote:
> Then it's an accident waiting to happen. Distributions will use
> the host.def shipped with XFree86 and you'll only get a bug report.
> I'm just trying to save you some work. It's a 1 byte change, sheesh.
>
host.def does NOT ex
ampigny, Michael
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:42:38AM -0400, Champigny, Michael wrote:
> > While we are on this topic, the flags for Alpha are too restrictive.
> > It should b
In light of this info, never mind what I just wrote.
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Champigny, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 06 April, 2001 10:12
Subject: Re: [Dr
"Champigny, Michael" wrote:
>
> Then it's an accident waiting to happen. Distributions will use
> the host.def shipped with XFree86 and you'll only get a bug report.
XFree86 has no host.def, it's a local file from that point of view.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)\ Debian GNU/Lin
AIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 9:56 AM
To: Champigny, Michael
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:42:38AM -0400, Champigny, Michael wrote:
> While we are on this topic, the flags for Alpha are too res
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 09:42:38AM -0400, Champigny, Michael wrote:
> While we are on this topic, the flags for Alpha are too restrictive.
> It should be the more conservative "-mcpu=ev5". By setting it to ev6,
> older Alpha's will not be able to run the compiled code. ev5 is chosen
> since it wil
aker
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:04:11PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
>
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
> #define DefaultGcc2Axp
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:04:11PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
>
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
> #define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O2
>
> That second line should be...
>
> #define De
"Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
> >
> > #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
> > #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
> > #define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O2
> >
> > That second line shou
"Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
>
> I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
>
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
> #define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O2
>
> That second line should be...
>
> #define DefaultGcc2PpcOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
>
> ..
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
> >
> > #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
> > #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
> > #define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O2
> >
> > That s
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
>
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
> #define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
> #define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O2
>
> That second line should be...
>
> #define DefaultGcc2PpcOpt -O2 -mcp
I just updated my tree and got this at the top of host.def:
#define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=ev6
#define DefaultGcc2AxpOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
#define DefaultGcc2i386Opt -O2
That second line should be...
#define DefaultGcc2PpcOpt -O2 -mcpu=750
...I think.
-jwb
_
14 matches
Mail list logo
