Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch /NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I

Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch /NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Brian Paul
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter N?tzel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I

Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Ian Romanick
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:28:01AM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton:

Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch /NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:28:01AM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: The problem is that it uses EXT_texture_env_dot3 (which the driver does advertise), but the driver doesn't actually implement only

Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Ian Romanick
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:57:32AM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:28:01AM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: The problem is that it uses EXT_texture_env_dot3 (which the

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Option AGPFastWrite 1 This just makes the machine lock up for me at X startup. same here, instant and nasty lockup. Ingo --- This

Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Ian Romanick
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:27:03PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Hmmm... Well, line 592 of scene.cpp (in glaxium 0.5, just downloaded from the website) seems to be: glEnable(GL_TEXTURE_2D); Line 586, though, makes reference to GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT. I've made the change there. Now,

Re: R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch /NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-21 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:27:03PM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Hmmm... Well, line 592 of scene.cpp (in glaxium 0.5, just downloaded from the website) seems to be: glEnable(GL_TEXTURE_2D); Line 586, though, makes reference to

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 07:06, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should do some testing. No go so far. Modules are somewhat

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 08:06 schrieb Linus Torvalds: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should do some testing. No go so far. Modules are somewhat

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Linus, Alan are you running SMP during your tests? Yup. I'm running with a dual P4 HT (ie 4 virtual CPU's to software), and I check with glxgears and the commercial tuxracer with a Radeon 8500. I've also verified it on a UP machine with a Radeon 7500.

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: System lookup immediately when I try to start ipers, isosurf or switch the screen. Sadly even when I try the Mesa-4-1-branch with 2.5.47-mm1 or 2.4.19-ck5 (radeon.o 1.6.0). Are you using scsi - any measuable amount of scsi I/O also hangs

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 18:45 schrieb Linus Torvalds: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Linus, Alan are you running SMP during your tests? Yup. I'm running with a dual P4 HT (ie 4 virtual CPU's to software), Yes, yes... Grumpf. I want a 8x Hammer...;-))) and I check with

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Ntzel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:44 schrieb Alan Cox: On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: System lookup immediately when I try to start ipers, isosurf or switch the screen. Sadly even when I try the Mesa-4-1-branch with 2.5.47-mm1 or 2.4.19-ck5 (radeon.o 1.6.0). Are you

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Can you please try ipers and isosurf from the Mesa-Demo package, too? Q3A and UT are sometimes broken even if the above works right. Well, I don't have the 3D apps, which is why I test with glxgears and tuxracer (the first because it's th eonly GL

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Andrew Morton
Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:44 schrieb Alan Cox: On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: System lookup immediately when I try to start ipers, isosurf or switch the screen. Sadly even when I try the Mesa-4-1-branch with 2.5.47-mm1 or 2.4.19-ck5

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:46 schrieb Linus Torvalds: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Can you please try ipers and isosurf from the Mesa-Demo package, too? Q3A and UT are sometimes broken even if the above works right. Well, I don't have the 3D apps, which is why I test

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:52 schrieb Andrew Morton: Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:44 schrieb Alan Cox: On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: System lookup immediately when I try to start ipers, isosurf or switch the screen. Sadly even when

R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-20 Thread Ian Romanick
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should do some testing. No go so far. Modules

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 21:18 schrieben Sie: Sorry, I watched Germany vs. Netherlands. We lost... 1:3 ;-) Hmm.. As far as I can tell, I'm now running the mesa-4-1-branch here, and ipers seems to work. But I have no way to tell what the version is, XF86_CUSTOM_VERSION is still set to

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: It's _really_ really slow, though, reporting a frame rate of 1.95 - 2.0 fps or so when viewing the thing (whatever it is) head on. What do you get with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose? glinfo? GL_VERSION: 1.4 Mesa 5.0 GL_EXTENSIONS: GL_ARB_depth_texture

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 00:49 schrieb Linus Torvalds: On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: It's _really_ really slow, though, reporting a frame rate of 1.95 - 2.0 fps or so when viewing the thing (whatever it is) head on. What do you get with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose? glinfo?

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. Doing a regular glxinfo shows OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20021009 AGP 4x x86/MMX/SSE TCL

RE: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48 GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. Doing a regular glxinfo shows OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20021009 AGP 4x x86/MMX

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 03:43 schrieb Linus Torvalds: On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. Doing a regular glxinfo shows OpenGL

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 04:03 schrieb Alexander Stohr: GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. Doing a regular glxinfo shows OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20021009

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Option AGPFastWrite 1 This just makes the machine lock up for me at X startup. Option EnablePageflip But this brings glxgears up to 2420 fps. Whee. Linus ---

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Keith Whitwell
Its a known issue for me, thats why i do prefer the GLUT demos. I made it to bring the Mesa demos to life on DRI by just editing the libGL and other references to the systems defaults rather than to the libs in the project. As far as i do remember, it all turned out to be rather static in

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-19 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should do some testing. No go so far. Modules are somewhat broken in 2.5.48. One approach is to not use modules, just

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-19 Thread Garry Reisky
It's a go here. I just installed 2.5.48 and I'm using mesa-4-1-branch. I just got done a wolfenstein session :) . On (20/11/02 07:20), Dieter N?tzel wrote: No go so far. Modules are somewhat broken in 2.5.48. I saw radeon 1.7.0 20020828 but no go, yet ;-( [drm] Initialized radeon 1.7.0