[Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-03 Thread Keith Whitwell
Thomas Emmel wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and this message means that the CVS-server is full. I think this was mentioned before two days ago. Some days before I had the problem that the download hangs in xc/xc/util/patch infinit

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-03 Thread Keith Whitwell
Keith Packard wrote: Around 9 o'clock on Sep 3, Keith Whitwell wrote: It seems like anon cvs is something that causes project-hosting sites some discomfort... freedesktop.org doesn't have it in place right now, for instance. Freedesktop doesn't have any "real" CVS running at the moment; we ne

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-03 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Thomas Emmel wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: > > > >>Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>and this message means that the CVS-server is full. > >>>I think this was mentioned before two days ago. > >>

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Felix Kühling
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Thomas Emmel wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: > > > > > >>Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>and this message m

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 03:55, Felix Kühling wrote: > On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 > Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > Thomas Emmel wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: > > > > > > > >>Thomas Emmel

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Eric Anholt wrote: On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 03:55, Felix Kühling wrote: On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: Thomas Emmel wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: Thomas Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-05 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 07:02:34 +0100 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 03:55, Felix Kühling wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 > >>Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>you're a registered developer. Also cvsup is supposed

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-05 Thread Keith Whitwell
Felix Kühling wrote: I think the idea is that you mirror the entire CVS repository with cvsup. Then you can do any read-only cvs operations on the local copy of the repository. That includes merging branches in a working copy. For commiting you still have to use the remote repository, though. So

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-05 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:57:57 +0100 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix Kühling wrote: > > > > > > I think the idea is that you mirror the entire CVS repository with > > cvsup. Then you can do any read-only cvs operations on the local copy of > > the repository. That includes mergi

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-05 Thread José Fonseca
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 01:09:00PM +0200, Felix K?hling wrote: > On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:57:57 +0100 > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Felix Kühling wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think the idea is that you mirror the entire CVS repository with > > > cvsup. Then you can do any read