Re: [PATCH] Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead.

2007-12-21 Thread Thomas Hellström
Keith Packard wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:28 +, Keith Whitwell wrote: Keith, I think this makes sense too. I'm hopeful Thomas would agree. I'll wait and see what he thinks before pushing then. It's perfectly OK with me. /Thomas +/* + * drm_bo_propose_flags: + * + *

Re: [PATCH] Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead.

2007-12-17 Thread Keith Whitwell
Keith Packard wrote: commit 32acf53eefa64cd41cc9bf45705b0825fc8a0eef Author: Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Dec 16 20:16:50 2007 -0800 Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead. Flags pending validation were stored in a misleadingly

Re: [PATCH] Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead.

2007-12-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:28 +, Keith Whitwell wrote: Keith, I think this makes sense too. I'm hopeful Thomas would agree. I'll wait and see what he thinks before pushing then. +/* + * drm_bo_propose_flags: + * + * @bo: the buffer object getting new flags + * + * @new_flags:

[PATCH] Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead.

2007-12-16 Thread Keith Packard
commit 32acf53eefa64cd41cc9bf45705b0825fc8a0eef Author: Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Dec 16 20:16:50 2007 -0800 Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead. Flags pending validation were stored in a misleadingly named field, 'mask'. As