Keith Packard wrote:
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:28 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith, I think this makes sense too. I'm hopeful Thomas would agree.
I'll wait and see what he thinks before pushing then.
It's perfectly OK with me.
/Thomas
+/*
+ * drm_bo_propose_flags:
+ *
+ *
Keith Packard wrote:
commit 32acf53eefa64cd41cc9bf45705b0825fc8a0eef
Author: Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Dec 16 20:16:50 2007 -0800
Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead.
Flags pending validation were stored in a misleadingly
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:28 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith, I think this makes sense too. I'm hopeful Thomas would agree.
I'll wait and see what he thinks before pushing then.
+/*
+ * drm_bo_propose_flags:
+ *
+ * @bo: the buffer object getting new flags
+ *
+ * @new_flags:
commit 32acf53eefa64cd41cc9bf45705b0825fc8a0eef
Author: Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Dec 16 20:16:50 2007 -0800
Rename inappropriately named 'mask' fields to 'proposed_flags' instead.
Flags pending validation were stored in a misleadingly named field, 'mask'.
As